Criminal statutes on murder are usually cited as supporting the consensus model of criminal law (i.e., accurately representing public sentiment). Innovatively, Israel recently modified law to recognize motive as a mitigating factor with murder following prolonged domestic abuse. This article presents and discusses the results of a national sample survey of Israeli respondents assessing the extent to which this modification of law reflects public attitudes toward the seriousness of such cases. The survey, based on a factorial design methodology, assessed public perceptions of seriousness of and appropriate punishment for killings committed by battered partners against their abuser and compared them to perceived seriousness of and appropriate punishment for other homicide cases committed because of other motives. The findings—broad consensus regarding the extreme seriousness of most murders and the lesser seriousness of domestic abuse murders—support the consensus model of crime in relation to the recently modified Israeli homicide law. Implications are discussed.
Applegate, B., Wright, J., Dunaway, R., Cullen, F., & Wooldredge, J. (1993). Victim-offender race and support for capital punishment: A factorial design approach. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 95-115.
2.
Ashworth, A. (1999). Principles of criminal law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4.
Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Macmillan/Free Press.
5.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2004). Statistical abstract of Israel. Jerusalem: Author.
7.
Chambliss, W. J., & Seidman, R. B. (1971). Law, order, and power. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
Chan, W. (1994). A feminist critique of self-defense and provocation in battered women’s cases in England and Wales. Women and Criminal Justice, 6, 39-65.
9.
Cureton, S. (2001). An empirical test of the social threat phenomenon using 1990 census and uniform crime reports. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 157-166.
10.
Del Tosto, D. (1981). The battered spouse syndrome as a defense to a homicide charge under the Pennsylvania crimes code. Villanova Law Review, 26, 105-134.
11.
Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
12.
Durham, A., Elrod, H., & Kinkade, P. (1996). Public support for the death penalty: Beyond Gallup. Justice Quarterly, 1, 705-736.
13.
Erez, E., & Hassin, Y. (1997). Women in crime and justice: The case of Israel. Women & Criminal Justice, 9, 61-85.
14.
Ewing, C. (1990). Psychological self-defense: A proposed justification for battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 579-594.
15.
Ewing, C. (1997). Battered women who kill. Fatal families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Ewing, C., & Morse, S. (1990). Psychological self-defense: A proposed justification for battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 579-618.
17.
Finkel, N. J. (1995). Commonsense justice: Juror’s notions of the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Finkel, N. J. (2000). Commonsense justice and jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 591-628.
19.
Finkel, N. J., Burke, J. E., & Chavez, L. J. (2000). Commonsense judgments of infanticide: Murder, manslaughter, madness, or miscellaneous?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 1113-1137.
20.
Flanagan, T., McGarrell, E., & Brown, E. (1985). Public perceptions and criminal courts: The role of demographic and related attitudinal data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 66-82.
21.
Goetting, A. (1995). Homicide in families and other special populations. New York: Springer.
22.
Herzog, S. (2003). Religiosity and perceptions of crime seriousness by Jewish and Muslim respondents in Israel. Deviant Behavior, 24, 153-174.
23.
Herzog, S. (2004). Differential perceptions of the seriousness of male violence against female intimate partners among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 891-900.
24.
Higgingbottom, S., & Zamble, E. (1988). Categorizations of homicide cases: Agreement, accuracy and confidence of public assignments. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 30, 351-366.
25.
Hoffman, D., & Webb, V. (1981). Suicide as murder at common law: Another chapter in the falsification of consensus theory. Criminology, 19, 372-384.
26.
Hox, J. J., Kreft, I. G. G., & Hermkins, P. L. (1991). The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociological Methods and Research, 19, 493-510.
27.
Jacoby, J., & Cullen, F. (1999). The structure of punishment norms: Applying the Rossi-Berk model. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89, 245-307.
28.
Jasso, G. (1994). Assessing individual and group differences in the sense of justice: Framework and application to gender differences in the justice of earnings. Social Science Research, 23, 368-406.
29.
Jurik, N. C., & Winn, R. (1990). Gender and homicide: A comparison of men and women who kill. Violence Victims, 5, 227-242.
30.
Knesset. (1995). Law proposals. Jerusalem: Author.
31.
LaFave, W., & Scott, A. (1986). Criminal law. St. Paul, MN: West.
32.
Lemert, E. (1967). Human deviance, social problems and social control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
Locke, L. M., & Richman, C. (1999). Attitudes toward domestic violence: Race and gender issues. Sex Roles, 40, 227-247.
34.
Mitchell, B. (1998). Public perceptions of homicide and criminal justice. British Journal of Criminology, 38, 453-472.
35.
O’Connell, M., & Whelan, A. (1996). Taking wrongs seriously: Public perceptions of crime seriousness. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 299-318.
36.
Odegard, E. (1995). Legality and legitimacy: On attitudes to drugs and social sanctions. British Journal of Criminology, 35, 525-542.
37.
Pierce, M. C., & Harris, R. (1993). The effect of provocation, race, and injury description on men’s and women’s perceptions of a wife-battering incident. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 767-790.
38.
Quinney, R. (1975). Crime control in capitalist society. In I. Taylor, P. Walton, & J. Young (Eds.), Critical criminology (pp. 181-201). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
39.
Roberts, J. (1992). Public opinion, crime and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 16, pp. 99-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Rossi, P., & Anderson, A. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. Rossi & S. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41.
Rossi, P., & Berk, R. (1985). Varieties of normative consensus. American Sociological Review, 50, 333-347.
42.
Rossi, P., & Berk, R. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views compared. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
43.
Rossi, P., Simpson, J., & Miller, J. (1985). Beyond crime seriousness: Fitting the punishment to the crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1, 59-59.
44.
Rossi, P., Waite, E., Bose, C., & Berk, R. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 39, 224-237.
45.
Schneider, E. (2000). Battered women and feminist lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46.
Schuller, R., & Vidmar, N. (1992). Battered woman syndrome evidence in the courtroom: A review of the literature. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 273-291.
47.
Schur, E. (1980). The politics of deviance: Stigma contests and the uses of power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48.
Sellin, T., & Wolfgang, M. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York: John Wiley.
49.
Siegel, L. (2000). Criminology. New York: Wadsworth.
50.
Smith, M. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257-273.
51.
Spitzer, S. (1976). Conflict and consensus in the law enforcement process: Urban minorities and the police. Criminology, 14, 189-212.
52.
Stone, R. (1999). Offenses against the person. London: Cavendish.
53.
Thomas, C., Cage, R., & Foster, S. (1976). Public opinion on criminal law and legal sanctions: An examination of two conceptual models. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 67, 110-116.
54.
Totman, J. (1978). The murderers. San Francisco: R & R Research Associates.
55.
Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. London: Yale University Press.
56.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2000a). Crime in the United States—1999. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
57.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2000b). Criminal victimization 1999: Changes 1998-99 with trends 1993-1999. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
Warr, M. (1989). What is the perceived seriousness of crimes?Criminology, 27, 795-821.
59.
Warr, M., Gibbs, J., & Erickson, M. (1982). Contending theories of criminal law: Statutory penalties versus public preferences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19, 25-46.
60.
White, N., & Roberts, J. (1985). Criminal intent: The public’s view. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 27, 455-466.
61.
Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., Tracy, P., & Singer, S. (1985). The national survey of crime severity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
62.
Yllo, K. A., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 383-399). London: Transaction.
