Using data from Statistics Canada’s Homicide Survey, this article explores the dynamics of intimate partner homicides in Canada between 1991 and 2000 among a range of relationships. The authors’ findings are consistent with previous studies that document an elevated risk of intimate partner homicide for women who have separated compared to women in intact relationships. Using bivariate and multivariate techniques, the authors find that a number of incident characteristics set apart homicides that occur in intact and estranged intimate relationships for women but not for men. Similarly, this study finds that the circumstances and motivational contexts of intimate homicides differ for female victims depending on relationship type (legal marriages, common-law unions, and other intimate relationships). These results support recommendations from Dawson and Gartner (1998) that researchers continue to develop conceptually meaningful categorizations of intimate partner homicides.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1996). Women’s safety survey, Australia, 1996 (ABS Catalogue No. 4128.0). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
2.
Block, C. R. (2000). The Chicago women’s health risk study: Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence (Final report to the National Institute of Justice). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
3.
Browne, A. (1986). Assault and homicide at home: When battered women kill. Advances in Applied Social Psychology, 3, 57-79.
4.
Campbell, J. (1992a). “If I can’t have you, no one can”: Power and control in homicide of female partners. In J. Radford & D. Russell (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of women killing (pp. 99-113). New York: Twayne.
5.
Campbell, J. (1992b). Prevention of wife battering: Insights from cultural analysis. Response, 80, 18-24.
6.
Campbell, J. (1995). Prediction of homicide of and by battered women. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 96-113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Campbell, J. (2001, June). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. Paper presented at the Annual Homicide Research Working Group Meeting, Orlando, FL.
8.
Dawson, M., & Gartner, R. (1998). Differences in the characteristics of intimate femicides. Homicide Studies, 2, 378-399.
9.
Dutton, D. (1988). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
Dutton, D. (1994). Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence and Victims, 9(2), 167-182.
11.
Gartner, R., Dawson, M., & Crawford, M. (1998). Women killing: Intimate femicide in Ontario, 1974-1994. Resources for Feminist Research, 26, 151-173.
12.
Hackett, K. (2000). Criminal harassment. Juristat, 20(11), 1-17.
13.
Heiskanen, M., & Piispa, M. (1998). Faith, hope, battering: A survey of men’s violence against women in Finland. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
14.
Hotton, T. (2001). Spousal violence after separation. Juristat, 21(7), 1-19.
15.
Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Scarborough, Ontario: Nelson Canada.
16.
Johnson, H., & Pottie Bunge, V. (2001). Prevalence and consequences of spousal assault in Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 27-45.
17.
Mahoney, M. R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1-94.
Mechanic, M. B., Uhlmansiek, M. H.,Weaver, T. L., & Resnick, P. A. (2000). The impact of severe stalking experienced by acutely battered women. Violence and Victims, 15, 443-458.
20.
Mirrlees-Black, C. (1999). Domestic violence: Findings from a new British crime survey self-completion questionnaire (Home Office Research Study 191). London: Home Office.
21.
Pottie Bunge, V., & Locke, D. (Eds.). (2000). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 2000 (Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 85-224-XPE). Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.
22.
Rennison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000, May). Intimate partner violence: Bureau of Justice Statistics special report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
Sev’er, A. (1997). Recent or imminent separation and intimate violence against women. Violence Against Women, 3, 566-590.
24.
Smith, P. H., Moracco, K. E., & Butts, J. (1998). Partner homicide in context: A population based perspective. Homicide Studies, 2, 400-421.
25.
Stanko, E. (1997). Should I stay or should I go? Some thoughts on the variants of intimate violence. Violence Against Women, 3, 629-635.
26.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
27.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000a). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
28.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000b). The role of stalking in domestic violence crime reports generated by the Colorado Springs Police Department. Violence and Victims, 15, 427-442.
29.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3-15.
30.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1998). Lethal and non-lethal violence against wives and the evolutionary psychology of male sexual proprietariness. In R. P. Dobash & R. E. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 199-230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Wilson, M., Johnson, H., & Daly, M. (1995). Lethal and non-lethal violence against wives. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 189-215.
