Keeping the Public in the Dark

Abstract

Drawing on a survey of parole board chairpersons in 45 of 50 states (90%) and the District of Columbia conducted between October 1997 and March 1998, this study focuses on the availability and ease of access of information concerning the parole of murderers to the public. Two important findings are reported: (a) The record-keeping systems of parole boards generally contain information that makes it possible to distinguish between prisoners convicted of various types of murder, and (b) the official publications and reports released by parole boards do not generally distinguish among categories of murder in reporting parole information and virtually never provide information on parole decisions with respect to capital murderers not sentenced to death.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bowers, W. J. , & Steiner, B. D. (1999). Death by default: An empirical demonstration of forced and false choices in capital sentencing. Texas Law Review, 43, 605-717.

Bowers, W. J. , Vandiver, M. , & Dugan, P. (1994). A new look at public opinion on capital punishment: What citizens and legislators prefer. American Journal of Criminal Law, 22, 77-115.

Feder, L. (1995). Psychiatric history, due procedural safeguards, and the use of discretion in the criminal justice process. Justice Quarterly, 12, 279-305.

McCleary, R. (1975). How structural variables constrain the parole officers’ use of discretionary power. Social Problems, 23, 209-225.

McCleary, R. (1978). Dangerous men: The sociology of parole. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Metchik, E. (1992). Judicial views of parole decision processes: Asocial science perspective. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 18, 135-157.

O’Leary, V. , & Nuffield, J. (1973). Parole decision-making characteristics: Report of a national survey. Criminal Law Bulletin, 8, 651-680.

Smith, B. L. , Watkins, E. , & Morgan, K. (1997). The effect of victim participation on parole decisions: Results from a southeastern state. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 8, 57-74.

Solomon, H. (1976). Parole outcome: A multidimensional contingency table analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 13, 107-126.

10.

Sorenson, J. R. , & Pilgrim, R. L. (2000). An actuarial risk assessment of violence posed by capital murder defendants. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 90, 1251-1270.

11.

Steiner, B. D. (1999). Still arbitrary: Capital sentencing in the post-Furman era. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 10, 85-102.

12.

Steiner, B. D. , Bowers, W. J. , & Sarat, A. (1999). Folk knowledge as legal action: Death penalty judgments and the tenet of early release in a culture of mistrust and punitiveness. Law & Society Review, 32, 461-506.