Although Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 has been in effect for more than 20 years, it has had little direct impact on educational practice until fairly recently. Moreover, the primary thrust has been directed toward children with mild disabilities. In this article, we focus on Section 504 as it pertains to children with autism. We describe eligibility requirements for Section 504, and rights and protections afforded. We also discuss trends in litigation for students with autism. Finally, we discuss potential issues pertaining to children with autism served under Section 504.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ash v. Lake Oswego School District, 980 F. 2d 585 (9th Cir. 1992).
2.
Axelrod, S. (1996). What's wrong with behavior analysis? Journal of BehavioralEducation, 6, 247-256.
3.
Board of Education of the North Rose-Wolcott Central School District. (1997) 26 IDELR 325 (SEA NY 1997).
4.
Boomer, L.W., & Garrison-Harrell, L. (1995). Legal issues concerning children with autism and pervasive developmental disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 53-61.
5.
Braman, B.J., Brady, M.P., Linehan, S.L., & Williams, R.E. (1995). Facilitated communication for children with autism: An examination of face validity. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 110-118.
6.
Bryson, S., Clark, B., & Smith, I. (1988). First report of a Canadian epidemiological study of autistic syndromes. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology , 29, 433-446.
7.
Casey, J. v. Derry School District. (1988). 1988-89 EHLR DEC.401:217.
8.
Cohen, D., Donnellan, A., & Paul, R. (Eds.). (1987). Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Silver Spring, MD: Winston .
9.
Conderman, G., & Katsiyannis, A. (1996). State practices in serving individuals with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11, 29-36.
10.
Consolidated High School District #230 (IL). (1993). OCR Rulings, 20 IDELR 1076.
11.
Council of Administrators of Special Education. ( 1991). Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 . Reston, VA: Author.
12.
Dighton-Rehobeth (MA) School District. (1994). OCR Rulings, 21 IDELR 1071.
13.
Jefferson Parish (LA) Public School System. (1993). OCR Rulings, 20 IDELR 88.
14.
Guernsey, T.F. (1989). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973: Statutory interaction following the Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986. Nebraska Law Review, 68, 564-599.
15.
Hartmann by Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education, 26 IDELR 167 (4th Cir. 1997).
16.
Henderson County Public Schools. (1997). 27 IDELR 435 (SEA NC 1997).
17.
Idol, L. (1993). Special educator's consultation handbook. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
18.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
19.
Katsiyannis, A., Landrum, T., & Reid, R. (in press). Section 504. Beyond Behavior.
20.
Kennedy, C.H., & Shukla, S. (1995). Social interaction research for people with autism as a set of past, current, and emerging propositions. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 21-35.
21.
Lincoln Consolidated Schools. (1996). 25 IDELR 92 (SEA MI 1996).
22.
Luce, S.C., & Dyer, K. (1995). Providing effective transitional programming to individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavioral Disorders , 21, 36-52.
23.
Maag, J.W. (1989). Use of cognitive mediation strategies for social skills training: Theoretical and conceptual issues. In R. B. Rutherford, Jr., & S. A DiGangi (Eds.), Severe behavior disorders of children and youth (Vol. 12, pp. 87-100). Reston, VA: Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders.
24.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (1991). Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973: Old problems and emerging issues for public schools. Liaison Bulletin, 17(8), 1-11.
25.
Pearl (MS) Public School District. (1991). OCR Rulings, 17 EHLR 1004.
Portland Public School. (1997). 26 IDELR 931 (SEA ME 1997).
28.
Reid, R., & Katsiyannis, A. (1995). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and Section 504. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 44-52.
29.
Robertson County School System v. King, 24 IDELR 1036 (6th Cir. 1996).
30.
Rotholz, D., Kamps, D., & Greenwood, C. (1989). Ecobehavioral assessment and analysis in special education settings for students with autism. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 59-81.
31.
Rumsey, J.M. (1992). Neuropsychological studies of high-level autism . In E. Schopler & G. Mesibov (Eds.), High functioning individuals with autism (pp. 41-64). New York: Plenum Press.
32.
San Ramon Valley (CA) Unified School District (1991). OCR Rulings, 18 IDELR 465.
33.
Sasso, G., & Reimers, T. (1988). Assessing the functional properties of behavior: Implications and applications for the classroom. Focus on AutisticBehavior, 3(5), 1-16.
34.
Simpson, R.L. (1995). Children and youth with autism in an age of reform: A perspective on current issues. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 7-20.
35.
Simpson, R.L., & Sasso, G.M. (1992). Full inclusion of students with autism in general education settings. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 7(3), 1-13.
36.
South Dakota Department of Education and Cultural Affairs. (1986). OCR Rulings, EHLR 352:191.
37.
Still v. DeBuono, 25 IDELR 32 (2d Cir. 1996).
38.
Sudbury (MA) Public Schools. (1991). 18 IDELR 72.
39.
Tsai, L.Y. (1992a). Diagnostic issues in high-functioning autism . In E. Schopler & G. Mesibov (Eds.), High functioning individuals with autism (pp. 11-40). New York: Plenum Press.
40.
Tsai, L.Y. (1992b). Medical treatment in autism. In D. Berkell (Ed.), Autism: Identification, education, and treatment (pp. 151-184). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Union School District v. Smith, 20 IDELR 987 (9th Cir. 1994).
42.
U.S. Department of Education. (1991). Joint policy memorandum, 18 IDELR 116.
43.
Washoe County School District. (1997). 27 IDELR 133 (SEA NV 1997).
44.
Yell, M.L. (1998). The law and special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
