Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1998-2
A Comparison of the Effects of Organismic and Setting Variables on the Social Interaction Behavior of Children with Developmental Disabilities and Autism
In this investigation, the effects of four setting events and two organismic variables on the social behavior of children with developmental disabilities and autism were compared. In Study 1, social interactions within dyads composed of one student with disabilities and one nondisabled peer were compared to triads composed of two nondisabled peers and one child with disabilities. In addition, differential effects of peer tutoring and peer initiation interventions were determined. In Study 2, the effects of high- and low-status peers within triadic social interaction groupings were examined to determine effects on both the students with disabilities and their nondisabled peers. The results suggest that peer dyads, the cooperative peer intervention, and triads composed of two high-status nondisabled peers were most effective in promoting positive social interactions for the participants with disabilities. Furthermore, there seemed to be no real benefit to low-status peers related to participation in this second investigation. Results are discussed in relation to the effective and efficient use of programs designed to effect social competence and inclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Artz, A. F., & Newman, C. M. (1990). Cooperative learning. Mathematics Teacher, 83, 448–449.
2.
Beckman, P. J., & Kohl, F. L. (1987). Interactions of preschoolers with and without handicaps in integrated and segregated settings: A longitudinal study. Mental Retardation, 25, 5–11.
3.
Chandler, L. K., Fowler, S. A., & Lubeck, R. C. (1992). An analysis of the effects of multiple setting events on the social behavior of preschool children with special needs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 249–263.
4.
Cosden, M. A., & Haring, T. G. (1992). Cooperative learning in the classroom: Contingencies, group interactions, and students with special needs. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2(1), 53–71.
5.
Cushing, L. S., & Kennedy, C. H. (in press). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.
6.
Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Stretton, K., & Hall, R. V. (1983). The peer tutoring spelling game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 225–239.
7.
Dugan, E., Kamps, D., Leonard, B., Watkins, N., Rheinberger, A., & Stackhous, J. (1995). Effects of cooperative learning groups during social studies for students with autism and fourth grade peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 175–188.
8.
Greenwood, C. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–535.
9.
Greenwood, C. R., & Carta, J. J. (1988). An ecobehavioral interaction analysis of instruction within special education. In E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.), Effective instructional strategies for exceptional children (pp. 505–521). Denver: Love.
10.
Gresham, F. M. (1981). Social skills training with handicapped children: A review. Review of Educational Research, 51, 139–176.
11.
Guralnick, M. J., & Groom, J. M. (1988). Peer interactions in mainstreamed and specialized classrooms: A comparative analysis. Exceptional Children, 54, 415–426.
12.
Haring, T. G., & Breen, C. G. (1992). A peer mediated social network intervention to enhance the social integration of persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 319–333.
13.
Hunt, P., Staub, D., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 290–301.
14.
Kamps, D. M., Barbetta, P. M., Leonard, B. R., & Delquadri, J. (1994). Classwide peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 49–61.
15.
Kamps, D. M., Leonard, B., Potucek, J., & Garrison-Harrell, L. (1995). Cooperative learning groups in reading: An integration strategy for students with autism and general classroom peers. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 89–109.
16.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Kennedy, C. H., Shukla, S., & Fryxell, D. (in press). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children.
18.
Lloyd, J. W., Crowley, E. P., Kohler, F. W., & Strain, P. S. (1988). Redefining the applied research agenda: Cooperative learning, prereferral, teacher consultation, and peer-mediated interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 43–52.
19.
Mundschenk, N. A., & Sasso, G. M. (1995). Assessing sufficient social exemplars for students with autism. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 62–78.
20.
Oden, S., & Asher, S. R. (1977). Coaching children in social skills for friendship making. Child Development, 48, 495–506.
21.
Odom, S. L., Hoyson, M., Jamieson, B., & Strain, P. S. (1985). Increasing handicapped preschoolers' peer social interactions: Cross-setting and component analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 3–16.
22.
Odom, S. L., & McEvoy, M. (1988). Integration of young children with handicaps and normally developing children. In S. L. Odom & M. B. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps (pp. 214–267). Baltimore: Brookes.
23.
Odom, S. L., & Strain, P. S. (1984). Classroom-based social skills instruction for severely handicapped preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4(3), 97–116.
24.
Peck, C. A., Donaldson, J., & Pezzoli, M. (1990). Some benefits nonhandicapped adolescents perceive for themselves from their social relationships with peers who have severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 214–249.
25.
Ragland, E. U., Kerr, M. M., & Strain, P. S. (1978). Effects of social initiations on the behavior of withdrawn autistic children. Behavior Modification, 2, 565–578.
26.
Sasso, G. M. (1987). Social integration of children with autism: Issues and procedures. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 2, 1–15.
27.
Sasso, G. M., Garrison-Harrell, L. G., & Rogers, L. (1994). Autism and socialization: Conceptual models and procedural variations. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 161–175). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
28.
Sasso, G. M., Mitchell, V. M., & Struthers, E. M. (1986). Peer tutoring versus structured interaction activities: Effects on the frequency and topography of peer initiations. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 249–259.
29.
Sasso, G. M., & Rude, H. A. (1987). Unprogrammed effects of training high-status peers to interact with severely handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 35–44.
30.
Simpson, R. L., Myles, B. S., Sasso, G., & Kamps, D. M. (1991). Promoting social interactions of children and youth with autism: Issues and procedures. Reston, VA: CEC Publications.
31.
Simpson, R. L., & Sasso, G. M. (1992). Full inclusion of students with autism in general education settings: Values versus science. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 7, 1–13.
32.
Slavin, R. E., Stevens, R. J., & Madden, N. A. (1988). Accommodating student diversity in reading and writing instruction: A cooperative learning approach. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 60–66.
33.
Strain, P. S. (1982). Social development of exceptional children. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
34.
Strain, P. S. (1983). Generalization of autistic children's social behavior change: Effects of developmentally integrated and segregated settings. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 23–34.
35.
Strain, P. S., & Odom, S. L. (1986). Peer social initiations: Effective intervention for social skills development. Exceptional Children, 52, 543–551.
36.
Tateyama-Sniezek, K. M. (1990). Cooperative learning: Does it improve the academic achievement of students with handicaps?. Exceptional Children, 56, 426–437.
37.
Wacker, D., McMahon, C., Steege, M., Berg, W., Sasso, G., & Melloy, K. (1990). A sequential alternating treatments design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 333–339.
