Effects of Embedding Special Interest Area in Instruction on the Engagement and Out-of-Seat Behaviors of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of embedding special interest areas (SIAs) in whole-group (WG) instruction on engagement and out-of-seat (OOS) behaviors for young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in general education classrooms. A multiple baseline across participants design was used to evaluate the functional relation between the SIA-embedded instruction and engagement and OOS behaviors of all three children. Non-targeted probes were conducted after every intervention session to investigate whether there was behavioral change when the SIAs were removed from instruction. Results indicated that embedding SIAs in WG instruction may increase the engagement behavior and decrease the OOS behavior of children with ASD; behavioral changes were maintained over time for all children.

Keywords

out-of-seat behavior special interest areas behavior change

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamson

L. B.

Bakeman

Deckner

D. F.

(2004). The development of symbol-infused joint engagement. Child Development, 75(4), 1171–1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00732.x

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.).

Barton

E. E.

Smith

B. J.

(2015). Advancing high-quality preschool inclusion: A discussion and recommendations for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415583048

Bennett

Reichow

Wolery

(2011). Effects of structured teaching on the behavior of young children with disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(3), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357611405040

Bishop

S. L.

Hus

Duncan

Huerta

Gotham

Pickles

Lord

(2013). Subcategories of restricted and repetitive behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(6), 1287–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1671-0

Boyd

B. A.

Conroy

M. A.

Mancil

G. R.

Nakao

Alter

P. J.

(2007). Effects of circumscribed interests on the social behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(8), 1550–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0286-8

Boyd

B. A.

McDonough

S. G.

Rupp

Khan

Bodfish

J. W.

(2011). Effects of a family-implemented treatment on the repetitive behaviors of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(10), 1330–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1156-y

Chazin

K. T.

Ledford

J. R.

Barton

E. E.

Osborne

K. C.

(2018). The effects of antecedent exercise on engagement during large group activities for young children. Remedial and Special Education, 39(3), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517716899

Crosland

Dunlap

(2012). Effective strategies for the inclusion of children with autism in general education classrooms. Behavior Modification, 36(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445512442682

10.

DiCarlo

C. F.

Pierce

S. H.

Baumgartner

Harris

M. E.

Ota

(2012). Whole-group instruction practices and children’s attention: A preliminary report. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 26(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2012.657744

11.

Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices

12.

El Zein

Solis

Vaughn

McCulley

. (2014). Reading comprehension interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders: A synthesis of research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(6), 1303–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1989-2

13.

Fisher

W. W.

Pawich

T. L.

Dickes

Paden

A. R.

Toussaint

(2014). Increasing the saliency of behavior-consequence relations for children with autism who exhibit persistent errors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(4), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.172

14.

Fleury

V. P.

Schwartz

I. S.

(2017). A modified dialogic reading intervention for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416637597

15.

Gast

D. L.

Spriggs

A. D.

(2014). Visual analysis of graphic data. In Ledford

J. R.

Gast

D. L.

(Eds.), Single case research methodology (pp. 176–210). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877937-9

16.

Gilliam

W. S.

(2005). Prekindergarteners left behind: Expulsion rates in state prekindergarten systems. Foundation for Child Development.

17.

Green

C. W.

Reid

D. H.

Canipe

V. S.

Gardner

S. M.

(1991). A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-537

18.

Gunn

K. C.

Delafield-Butt

J. T.

(2016). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder with restricted interests: A review of evidence for best practice. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 408–430. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315604027

19.

Hagopian

L. P.

Long

E. S.

Rush

K. S.

(2004). Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 28(5), 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445503259836

20.

Hemmeter

M. L.

Conroy

M. A.

(2018). Advancement of evidence-based programs for young children with social and emotional learning difficulties. School Mental Health, 10, 199–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9275-2

21.

Hemmeter

M. L.

Snyder

Kinder

Artman

(2011). Impact of performance feedback delivered via electronic mail on preschool teachers’ use of descriptive praise. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.05.004

22.

Keen

(2009). Engagement of children with autism in learning. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.33.2.130

23.

Kiely

Migdal

T. R.

Vettam

Adesman

(2016). Prevalence and correlates of elopement in a nationally representative sample of children with developmental disabilities in the United States. PLOS ONE, 11(2), Article e0148337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148337

24.

Kishida

Kemp

(2006). Measuring child engagement in inclusive early childhood settings: Implications for practice. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(2), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910603100204

25.

Kodak

Paden

Dickes

(2012). Training and generalization of peer-directed mands with non-vocal children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 28(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393112

26.

Koegel

Kim

Koegel

Schwartzman

(2013). Improving socialization for high school students with ASD by using their preferred interests. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 2121–2134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1765-3

27.

Korea Ministry of Education. (2013). Preschool curriculum for age 3 to 5. Ministry of Education.

28.

Kritikos

E. P.

Birnbaum

(2003). General education and special education teachers’ beliefs regarding collaboration. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 93–100.

29.

Lane

J. D.

Ledford

J. R.

(2014). Using interval-based systems to measure behavior in early childhood special education and early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121414524063

30.

Ledford

J. R.

Gast

D. L.

(Eds.). (2018). Single case research methodology (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666

31.

Mancil

G. R.

Pearl

C. E.

(2008). Restricted interests as motivators: Improving academic engagement and outcomes of children on the autism spectrum. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 4(6), n6.

32.

McComas

Hoch

Paone

El-Roy

(2000). Escape behavior during academic tasks: A preliminary analysis of idiosyncratic establishing operations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(4), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-479

33.

McWilliam

R. A.

Trivette

C. M.

Dunst

C. J.

(1985). Behavior engagement as a measure of the efficacy of early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5(1–2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0270-4684(85)80006-9

34.

Morris

K. R.

Horner

R. H.

(2016). Positive behavior support. In Sailor

Dunlap

Sugai

Horner

(Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based practices in intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 415–441). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26583-4_15

35.

National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). NAEYC position statement on developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth to age 8.

36.

Ninci

Neely

L. C.

Burke

M. D.

Rispoli

Vannest

K. J.

Willson

Ulloa

(2020). A meta-analysis of single-case research on embedding interests of individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education, 41(5), 296–308.

37.

Ogundele

M. O.

(2018). Behavioural and emotional disorders in childhood: A brief overview for pediatricians. World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, 7(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v7.i1.9

38.

Powell

D. R.

Burchinal

M. R.

File

Kontos

(2008). An eco-behavioral analysis of children’s engagement in urban public school preschool classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.04.001

39.

Raspa

M. J.

McWilliam

R. A.

Maher Ridley

(2001). Child care quality and children’s engagement. Early Education and Development, 12(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1202_3

40.

Ridley

S. M.

McWilliam

R. A.

Oates

C. S.

(2000). Observed engagement as an indicator of child care program quality. Early Education and Development, 11(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1102_1

41.

Rispoli

Lang

Neely

Camargo

Hutchins

Davenport

Goodwyn

(2013). A comparison of within-and across-activity choices for reducing challenging behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9164-y

42.

Rogers

S. J.

Dawson

(2020). Early Start Denver Model for young children with autism: Promoting language, learning, and engagement. Guilford Publications.

43.

Smith

Fox

(2003). Systems of service delivery: A synthesis of evidence relevant to young children at risk of or who have challenging behavior. Center for Evidence-based Practice: Young Children with Challenging Behavior.

44.

Steinbrenner

J. R.

Hume

Odom

S. L.

Morin

K. L.

Nowell

S. W.

Tomaszewski

Szendrey

McIntyre

N. S.

Yucesoy-Ozkan

Savage

M. N.

(2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism. National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. https://ncaep.fpg.unc.edu/sites/ncaep.fpg.unc.edu/fles/imce/documents/EBP%20Report%202020.pdf

45.

Willford

A. P.

Maier

M. F.

Downer

J. T.

Pianta

R. C.

Howes

(2013). Understanding how children’s engagement and teachers’ interactions combine to predict school readiness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.05.002

46.

Zimmerman

K. N.

Ledford

J. R.

Severini

K. E.

(2019). Brief report: The effects of a weighted blanket on engagement for a student with ASD. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618794911