Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-3
Expert Consensus on the Development of a School-Based Intervention to Improve the School Participation and Connectedness of Elementary Students on the Autism Spectrum: A Delphi Study
School participation and connectedness have significant implications for student outcomes while at school and in later life. The need to develop evidence-based interventions to proactively support students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is imperative. A two-round Delphi technique was used to gain expert consensus to inform the development of a school-based intervention to improve the school participation and connectedness of elementary students with ASD. Seventy-six expert clinicians, educators, and researchers completed Round 1 and 65 completed Round 2. Consensus was achieved on the application of a conceptual framework of participation in Round 1, which informed the theoretical rationale of the intervention. Consensus on the importance of proposed classroom modules and the feasibility of proposed intervention techniques was achieved in Round 2. The process of gaining expert perspectives to develop an evidence-based intervention provides greater confidence that the intervention will be effective in achieving meaningful outcomes for students with ASD.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.).
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders (5th ed.).
3.
BattenA.CorbettC.RosenblattM.WithersL.YuilleR. (2006). Make school make sense. Autism and education: The reality for families today. National Autistic Society.
4.
BonellC.HumphreyN.FletcherA.MooreL.AndersonR.CampbellR. (2014). Why schools should promote students’ health and wellbeing. British Medical Journal, 348, Article g3078. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3078
5.
BoulkedidR.AbdoulH.LoustauM.SibonyO.AltertiC. (2011). Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting health care quality indicators: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 6(6), 1–9.
6.
CampbellM.FitzpatrickR.HainesA.KinmouthA. L.SandercockP.SpiegelhalterD.TyrerP. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal, 321, 694–696. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694
7.
ChangY.LockeJ. (2016). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 1–10.
8.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Belonging, being & becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Council of Australian Governments.
9.
CraigP.DieppeP.MacintyreS.MichieS.NazarethI.PetticrewM. (2013). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inurstu.2012.09.009
10.
CurtinM.FosseyE. (2007). Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x
11.
DiamondI. R.GrantR. C.FeldmanB. M.PencharzdP. B.LingS. C.MooreA. M.WaleP. W. (2014). Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67, 401–409.
12.
FalkmerM.GranlundM.NilholmC.FalkmerT. (2012). From my perspective: Perceived participation in mainstream schools in students with autism spectrum conditions. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.671382
13.
FormanS. G.OlinS. S.HoagwoodK. E.CroweM.SakaN. (2008). Evidence based interventions in schools: Developers’ views of implementation barriers and facilitators. School Mental Health, 1(1), 26–36.
14.
GiannarouL.ZervasE. (2014). Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 9(2), 66–82.
15.
GoodenowC. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79–90.
16.
GraneheimU. H.LundmanB. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.
17.
HodgesA.JoostenA.Bourke-TaylorH.CordierR. (2019). School participation: The shared perspectives of parents and educators of primary school students on the autism spectrum. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 97, Article 103550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103550
18.
HsuC.SandfordB. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.
19.
ImmsC.GranlundM.WilsonP.SteenbergenB.RosenbaumP.GordonA. (2016). Participation, both a means and an end: A conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 59, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13237
20.
JaycoxL. H.McCaffreyD. F.OcampoB. W.ShelleyG. A.BlakeS. M.PetersonD. J.RichmondL. S.KubL. E. (2006). Challenges in the evaluation and implementation of school-based prevention and intervention programs on sensitive topics. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(3), 320–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006291010
21.
KasariC.SmithT. (2013). Interventions in schools for children with autism spectrum disorder: Methods and recommendations. Autism, 17(3), 254–267.
22.
LiamputtongP. (Ed.). (2017). Research methods in health: Foundations for evidence based practice (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
23.
MathieE.WilsonP.PolandF.McNeillyE.HoweA.StaniszewskaS.. . . GoodmanC. (2014). Consumer involvement in health research: A UK scoping and survey. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12072
24.
McNeelyC. A.NonnemakerJ. M.BlumR. W. (2002). Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of School Health, 72, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06533.x
25.
MillerL. E. (2006). Determining what could/should be: The Delphi technique and its application [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH, United States.
26.
MullenP. M. (2003). Delphi: Myths and reality. Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 17(1), 7–52.
27.
National Autism Center. (2015). Findings and conclusions: National Standards Project, Phase 2. Addressing the need for evidence-based practice guidelines for Autism Spectrum Disorder. http://www.autismdiagnostics.com/assets/Resources/NSP2.pdf
28.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnockeyA.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX. (2011). The post high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 (NLTS2). National Center for Special Education Research. https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20113005/pdf/20113005.pdf
29.
OdomS.BrownW.FreyT.KarasuN. (2003). Evidence based practices for young children with autism: Contributions for single-subject design research. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(3), 166–175.
30.
OdomS.Collet-KlingenbergL.RogersS.HattonD. (2010). Evidence based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure, 54(4), 275–282.
31.
Rotheram-FullerE.KasariC.ChamberlainB.LockeJ. (2010). Social involvement of children with autism spectrum disorders in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(11), 1227–1234.
32.
SaggersB.HwangY.MercerK. L. (2011). Your voice counts: Listening to the voice of high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 35(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.35.2.173
33.
ShochetI.DaddsM. R.HamD.MontagueR. (2006). School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_1
34.
SkulmoskiG. J.HartmanF. T.KrahnJ. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1–21.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
