Understanding the Effect Size of Peer-Mediated Academic Instruction: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

A deficit in social skills often makes teaching academics a second thought when instructing students with autism. Peer-mediated instruction has been well studied for increasing academic skills across various disabilities and social skills for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect size of peer-mediated academic instruction (PMAI) to increase academic skills for students with ASD. Results indicate studies demonstrate a weak to moderate effect when using PMAI to teach students with ASD. These results validate PMAI can be effective when teaching academic skills to students with ASD; however, more studies are needed to better understand for whom and under what conditions PMAI is most effective.

Keywords

autism peer tutoring academic interventions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asselin

S. B.

Vasa

S. F.

(1981, December). Let the kids help one another: A model training and evaluation system for the utilization of peer tutors with special needs students in Vocational Education [Paper presentation]. The Annual Conference of the American Vocational Association, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Bedrosian

Lasker

Speidel

Politsch

(2003). Enhancing the written narrative skills of an AAC student with autism: Evidence-based research issues. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(4), 305–324.

Bene

Banda

D. R.

Brown

(2014). A meta-analysis of peer-mediated instructional arrangements and autism. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0014-9

Beretvas

S. N.

Chung

(2008). A review of meta-analyses of single-subject experimental designs: Methodological issues and practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489530802446302

Bowman-Perrott

Davis

Vannest

Williams

Greenwood

Parker

(2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 39–55.

Broer

S. M.

Doyle

M. B.

Giangreco

M. F.

(2005). Perspectives of students with intellectual disabilities about their experiences with paraprofessional support. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 415.

Carnevale

A. P.

Smith

Strohl

(2013). Recovery: Job growth and education requirements through 2020. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED584413

*Carter

E. W.

Cushing

L. S.

Clark

N. M.

Kennedy

C. H.

(2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students’ access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.1.15

*Carter

E. W.

Gustafson

J. R.

Sreckovic

M. A.

Dykstra Steinbrenner

J. R.

Pierce

N. P.

Bord

. . .Mullins

(2017). Efficacy of peer support interventions in general education classrooms for high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education, 38(4), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516672067

10.

Carter

E. W.

Moss

C. K.

Asmus

Fesperman

Cooney

Brock

M. E.

. . . Vincent

L. B.

(2015). Promoting inclusion, social connections, and learning through peer support arrangements. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0040059915594784

11.

Chen

Abrams

D. A.

Rosenberg-Lee

Iuculano

Wakeman

H. N.

Prathap

. . .Menon

(2019). Quantitative analysis of heterogeneity in academic achievement of children with autism. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(2), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618809353

12.

Chung

K. M.

Reavis

Mosconi

Drewry

Matthews

Tassé

M. J.

(2007). Peer-mediated social skills training program for young children with high-functioning autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2006.05.002

13.

Cohen

P. A.

Kulik

J. A.

Kulik

C. L. C.

(1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002237

14.

Drevon

Fursa

S. R.

Malcolm

A. L.

(2017). Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data. Behavior Modification, 41(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516673998

15.

*Dugan

Kamps

Leonard

Watkins

Rheinberger

Stackhaus

(1995). Effects of cooperative learning groups during social studies for students with autism and fourth-grade peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-175

16.

Egel

A. L.

Richman

G. S.

Koegel

R. L.

(1981). Normal peer models and autistic children’s learning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1981.14-3

17.

Franca

V. M.

Kerr

M. M.

Reitz

A. L.

Lambert

(1990). Peer tutoring among behaviorally disordered students: Academic and social benefits to tutor and tutee. Education and Treatment of Children, 13(2), 109–128. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42900433

18.

Ganz

J. B.

Morin

K. L.

Foster

M. J.

Vannest

K. J.

Genç Tosun

Gregori

E. V.

Gerow

S. L.

(2017). High-technology augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex communication needs: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(4), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1373855

19.

Gaustad

(1993). Peer and cross-age tutoring. ERIC Digest. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/3300/digest079.pdf?seque

20.

Griswold

D. E.

Barnhill

G. P.

Myles

B. S.

Hagiwara

Simpson

R. L.

(2002). Asperger syndrome and academic achievement. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 17(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F10883576020170020401

21.

Haas

Vannest

Thompson

J. L.

Fuller

M. C.

Wattanawongwan

(2020). Peer-mediated instruction and academic outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorders: A comparison of quality indicators. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(5), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1859330

22.

Harper

G. F.

Maheady

(2007). Peer-mediated teaching and students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512070430020101

23.

Hoff

K. E.

Robinson

S. L.

(2002). Best practices in peer-mediated interventions. Best Practices in School Psychology IV, 2, 1555–1567.

24.

Hott

B. L.

Alresheed

F. M.

Henry

H. R.

(2014). Peer tutoring interventions for student with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-synthesis. The Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 15(1/2), 109–121. https://doi.org10.2478/JSER-2014-0007

25.

*Huber

H. B.

(2016). Structural analysis to inform peer support arrangements for high school students with autism [Doctoral dissertation]. Vanderbilt University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (Publication No. 10151695).

26.

*Huber

H. B.

Carter

E. W.

Lopano

S. E.

Stankiewicz

K. C.

(2018). Using structural analysis to inform peer support arrangements for high school students with severe disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.2.119

27.

Hunt

Staub

Alwell

Goetz

(1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 19(4), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699401900405

28.

Joo

S. H.

Ferron

J. M.

Moeyaert

Beretvas

S. N.

Van den Noortgate

(2019). Approaches for specifying the level-1 error structure when synthesizing single-case data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1409181

29.

*Kamps

D. M.

Barbetta

P. M.

Leonard

B. R.

Delquadri

(1994). Classwide peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-49

30.

Kamps

D. M.

Dugan

Potucek

Collins

(1999). Effects of cross-age peer tutoring networks among students with autism and general education students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022836900290

31.

*Kamps

D. M.

Leonard

Potucek

Garrison-Harrell

(1995). Cooperative learning groups in reading: An integration strategy for students with autism and general classroom peers. Behavioral Disorders, 21(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299502100103

32.

*Kamps

D. M.

Locke

Delquadri

Hall

R. V.

(1989). Increasing academic skills of students with autism using fifth grade peers as tutors. Education and Treatment of Children, 12(1), 38–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42899092

33.

Keen

Webster

Ridley

(2016). How well are children with autism spectrum disorder doing academically at school? An overview of the literature. Autism, 20(3), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315580962

34.

*Koh

H. J.

(2013). Peer-mediated inference making intervention for students with autism spectrum disorders [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (Publication No. 3549101).

35.

Krebs

M. L.

McDaniel

D. M.

Neeley

R. A.

(2010). The effects of peer training on the social interactions of children with autism spectrum disorders. Education, 131(2), 393–404.

36.

Kurth

J. A.

Mastergeorge

A. M.

(2010). Academic and cognitive profiles of students with autism: Implications for classroom practice and placement. International Journal of Special Education, 25(2), 8–14.

37.

Lindsay

Proulx

Thomson

Scott

(2013). Educators’ challenges of including children with autism spectrum disorder in mainstream classrooms. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 60(4), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2013.846470

38.

Lipsey

M. W.

Wilson

D. B.

(2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.

39.

Maggin

D. M.

Cook

B. G.

Cook

(2019). Making sense of single-case design effect sizes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(3), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12204

40.

Manolov

Losada

J. L.

Chacón-Moscoso

Sanduvete-Chaves

(2016). Analyzing two-phase single-case data with non-overlap and mean difference indices: Illustration, software tools, and alternatives. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00032

41.

McCurdy

E. E.

Cole

C. L.

(2014). Use of a peer support intervention for promoting academic engagement of students with autism in general education settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(4), 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1941-5

42.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.,

& Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

43.

Nation

Clarke

Wright

Williams

(2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(7), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0130-1

44.

Newman

Wagner

Knokey

A. M.

Marder

Nagle

Shaver

Wei

(2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524044.pdf

45.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002).

46.

Parker

R. I.

Vannest

(2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006

47.

Parker

R. I.

Vannest

K. J.

Brown

(2009). The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500201

48.

Parker

R. I.

Vannest

K. J.

Davis

J. L.

Sauber

S. B.

(2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006

49.

Petursdottir

A. L.

McComas

McMaster

Horner

(2007). The effects of scripted peer tutoring and programming common stimuli on social interactions of a student with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.160-05

50.

Rakap

Evran

Cig

(2016). Comparative evaluation of the reliability and validity of three data extraction programs: UnGraph, GraphClick, and DigitizeIt. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.008

51.

*Regelski

R. E.

Jr. (2016). The effectiveness of peer-assisted learning strategies on reading comprehension for students with autism spectrum disorder [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh.

52.

*Reutebuch

C. K.

El Zein

Kim

M. K.

Weinberg

A. N.

Vaughn

(2015). Investigating a reading comprehension intervention for high school students with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.10.002

53.

*Schaefer

J. M.

Cannella-Malone

Brock

M. E.

(2018). Effects of peer support arrangements across instructional formats and environments for students with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 39(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517727865

54.

Scott

K. L.

(2013). Exploring personal connections to texts and peers using cooperative peers tutoring groups in English language arts instruction with students with autism [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (Publication No. 3574633).

55.

Snyder

T. D.

de Brey

Dillow

S. A.

(2016). Digest of Education Statistics 2015, NCES 2016-014. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

56.

Tarlow

K. R.

(2017). An improved rank correlation effect size statistic for single-case designs: Baseline corrected Tau. Behavior Modification, 41(4), 427–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516676750

57.

Vannest

K. J.

Ninci

(2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038

58.

Vannest

K. J.

Parker

R. I.

Gonen

Adiguzel

(2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University. singlecaseresearch.org

59.

Watkins

Ledbetter-Cho

O’Reilly

Barnard-Brak

Garcia-Grau

(2019). Interventions for students with autism in inclusive settings: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(5), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000190

60.

Wei

Christiano

E. R.

J. W.

Wagner

Spiker

(2015). Reading and math achievement profiles and longitudinal growth trajectories of children with an autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 19(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313516549

61.

Welsh

Parke

R. D.

Widaman

O’Neil

(2001). Linkages between children’s social and academic competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 39(6), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00084-X

62.

Whalon

Hanline

M. F.

(2008). Effects of a reciprocal questioning intervention on the question generation and responding of children with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43(3), 367–387. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879798

63.

Wong

Odom

S. L.

Hume

Cox

A. W.

Fettig

Kucharczyk

. . .Schultz

T. R.

(2013). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

64.

Zhang

Wheeler

J. J.

(2011). A meta-analysis of peer-mediated interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 62–77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880031

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB