There is a dearth of appropriate reading material for adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDDs). Often, a book’s content is relevant to younger audiences, or its reading level is inaccessible. In this pilot study, we determined which factors facilitate reading accuracy and comprehension for this population. We wrote and tested leveled texts that manipulated three variables: (a) complex versus simple words and syntax, (b) a single illustration versus symbols accompanying each word, and (c) engaging single versus multiple modalities when answering comprehension questions. Twenty adult readers with IDD participated. Readers made more errors while reading the complex and the symbol support books. Our manipulations did not facilitate reading comprehension. These results support the use of straightforward text and illustrations in books for adults with IDD. Following up on this pilot study through more focused research will help us to create material that is accessible and enjoyable to this community.
AinsworthM. K.EvmenovaA. S.BehrmannM.JeromeM. (2016). Teaching phonics to groups of middle school students with autism, intellectual disabilities and complex communication needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 56, 165–176.
2.
AndersonL.HumphriesK.McDermottS.MarksB.SisirakJ.LarsonS. (2013). The state of the science of health and wellness for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 385–398.
3.
BaileyR. L.AngellM. E.StonerJ. B. (2011). Improving literacy skills in students with complex communication needs who use augmentative/alternative communication systems. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 352–368.
4.
BegenyJ. C.GreeneD. J. (2014). Can readability formulas be used to successfully gauge difficulty of reading materials?Psychology in the Schools, 51, 198–215.
BochnerS.OuthredL.PieterseM. (2001). A study of functional literacy skills in young adults with Down syndrome. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48, 67–90.
7.
BoyleC.BouletS.SchieveL.CohenR.BlumbergS.Yeargin-AllsoppM.KoganM. D. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042.
8.
CrossleyS. A.DuftyD. F.McCarthyP. M.McNamaraD. S. (2007). Toward a new readability: A mixed model approach. In McNamaraD. S.TraftonJ. G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 197–202). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
9.
CunninghamJ.SpadorciaS.EricksonK.KoppenhaverD.SturmJ.YoderD. (2005). Investigating the instructional supportiveness of leveled texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 410–427.
10.
CuskellyM.PoveyJ.JoblingA. (2016). Trajectories of development of receptive vocabulary in individuals with Down syndrome. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 13, 111–119.
11.
DunnL. M.DunnD. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
12.
FajardoI.AvilaV.FerrerA.TavaresG.GomezM.HernandezA. (2014). Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: Linguistic factors affecting comprehension. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27, 212–225.
13.
FowlerA. E.DohertyB. J.BoyntonL. (1995). The basis of reading skill in young adults with Down syndrome. In NadelL.RosenthalD. (Eds.), Down syndrome: Living and learning in the community (pp. 182–196). New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
FryE. (2002). Readability versus leveling. The Reading Teacher, 56, 286–291.
15.
GraesserA. C.McNamaraD. S.LouwerseM. M.CaiZ. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193–202.
16.
HabibM.LardyC.DesilesT.CommeirasC.ChobertJ.BessonM. (2016). Music and dyslexia: A new musical training method to improve reading and related disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–15.
17.
HarrisJ. C. (2006). Intellectual disability: Understanding its development, causes, classification, evaluation, and treatment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
HibbingA. N.Rankin-EricksonJ. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual images to improve comprehension for middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56, 758–770.
19.
HicksC. P.VillaumeS. K. (2000). Finding our own way: Critical reflections on the literacy development of two Reading Recovery children. The Reading Teacher, 54, 398–412.
20.
HiebertE. H. (1999). Selecting texts for beginning reading instruction. In RaphealT. E.AuK. H. (Eds.), Literature-based instruction: Present issues, future directions (pp. 195–218). Newton, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
21.
HoffmanJ. V.RoserN. L.SalasR.PattersonE.PenningtonJ. (2001). Text leveling and “little books” in first-grade reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 507–528.
22.
HoutsP. S.DoakC. C.DoakL. G.LoscalzoM. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling, 61, 173–190.
23.
JonesF.LongK.FinlayW. (2007). Symbols can improve the reading comprehension of adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 5, 545–550.
24.
JonesK. R. (1979). A rebus system of non-fade visual language. Child: Care, Health and Development, 5, 1–7.
25.
LevieW. H.LentzR. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology, 30, 195–232.
26.
MaulikP. K.MascarenhasM. N.MathersC. D.DuaT.SaxenaS. (2011). Prevalence of intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 419–436.
27.
Mayer-JohnsonInc. (2002). Boardmaker. Solana Beach, CA: Author.
28.
McClanahanB.WilliamsK.KennedyE.TateS. (2012). A breakthrough for Josh: How use of an iPad facilitated reading improvement. Techtrends, 56(3), 20–28.
29.
MolS. E.BusA. G.de JongM. T. (2009). Interactive book reading in early education: A tool to stimulate print knowledge as well as oral language. Review of Educational Research, 79, 979–1007.
30.
MorganM. F.MoniK. B. (2008). Meeting the challenge of limited literacy resources for adolescents and adults with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Special Education, 35, 92–101.
31.
NomuraM.NielsenG. S.TronbackeB. I.International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2010). Guidelines for easy-to-read materials. The Hague, Netherlands: IFLA Headquarters.
32.
PikeM. M.BarnesM. A.BarronR. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 243–255.
33.
PoncelasA.MurphyG. (2007). Accessible information for people with intellectual disabilities: Do symbols really help?Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 466–474.
34.
RaggiV.ChronisA. (2006). Interventions to address the academic impairment of children and adolescents with ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 9, 85–111.
35.
SamuelsS. J. (1988). Decoding and automaticity: Helping poor readers become automatic at word recognition. The Reading Teacher, 41, 756–760.
36.
SchmittN. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SpadorciaS. (2005). Examining the text demands of high-interest, low-level books. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 21, 33–59.
38.
SwartzM.HendricksC. (2000). Factors that influence the book selection process of students with special needs. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 608–618.
39.
van KraayenoordC. E. (1994). Literacy for adults with an intellectual disability in Australia. Journal of Reading, 37, 608–610.
40.
WoodcockR. (1968). Rebus as a medium in beginning reading instruction. In Institute on Mental Retardation and Intellectual Development (IMRID) papers and reports (Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1–35). Nashville, TN: George Peabody College for Teachers.
41.
WoodcockR. (2011). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
42.
World Health Organization. (1992). The international classification of diseases (10th Rev., ICD10). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
43.
YoungL.MoniK.JoblingA.KraayenoordC. (2007). Literacy skills of adults with intellectual disabilities in two community-based day programs. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51, 83–97.
