Facilitated communication (FC) has been interpreted as an ideomotor phenomenon, in which one person physically supports another person’s hand and unconsciously affects the content of the writing. Despite the strong experimental evidence against the authenticity of FC output, several studies claim to support its validity based on idiosyncrasies found in the texts produced. A review of these studies showed that, because of the logical circularity of the reasoning proposed in the studies, no decisive evidence that validated FC was presented. In addition, the idiosyncrasies found were better explained as by-products of the unusual writing process itself. Finally, the studies did not fulfill the quality standards proposed by the FC field itself.
BernardiL.TuzziA. (2011a). Analyzing written communication in AAC contexts: A statistical perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 183–194.
4.
BernardiL.TuzziA. (2011b). Statistical analysis of textual data from corpora of written communication—New results from Italian Interdisciplinary Research Program (EASIEST). In MohammediM. (Ed.), A comprehensive book on autism spectrum disorders (pp. 413–434). Retrieved from http://www.intechopen.com/books/a-comprehensive-book-on-autism-spectrum-disorders
5.
BiklenD. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.
6.
BiklenD. (1993). Communication unbound: How facilitated communication is challenging traditional views of autism and ability/disability. New York, NY: Teachers College.
7.
BiklenD. (2005). Autism and the myth of the person alone. New York: New York University Press.
8.
BiklenD.SahaN.KliewerC. (1995). How teachers confirm authorship of facilitated communication. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 20, 45–56.
9.
BiklenD.Winston MortonM.Nina SahaS.DuncanJ.GoldD.HardardottirM.RaoS. (1991). “I AMN NOT A UTISTIVC ON THJE TYP” (“I’m not autistic on the typewriter”). Disability, Handicap & Society, 6, 161–180.
10.
BoyntonJ. (2012). Facilitated communication—What harm it can do: Confessions of a former facilitator. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 6, 3–13.
11.
BroderickA.Kasa-HendricksonC. (2001). “Say just one word at first”: The emergence of reliable speech in a student labeled with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 26, 13–24.
12.
BurgessC. A.KirschI.ShaneH.NiederauerK. L.GrahamS. M.BaconA. (1998). Facilitated communication as an ideomotor response. Psychological Science, 9, 71–74.
13.
CardinalD. N.FalveyM. A. (2014). The maturing of facilitated communication: A means toward independent communication. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 189–194.
14.
CarpenterW. B. (1852, March). On the influence of suggestion in modifying and directing muscular movement, independently of volition. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain. Retrieved from http://www.sgipt.org/medppp/psymot/carp1852.htm
15.
CrossleyR. (1994). Facilitated communication training. New York, NY: Teachers College.
16.
CumminsR.PriorM. (1992). Autism and assisted communication: A response to Biklen. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 228–241.
17.
DockrellJ. E.RickettsJ.CharmanT.LindsayG. (2014). Exploring writing in products in students with language impairments and autism spectrum disorders. Learning and Instruction, 32, 81–90.
18.
EberlinM.McConnachieG.IbelS.VolpeL. (1993). Facilitated communication: A failure to replicate the phenomenon. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 507–530.
19.
EigstiI.-M.de MarchenaA. B.SchuhJ. M.KelleyE. (2011). Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: A developmental review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 681–691.
20.
EmersonA.GraysonA.GriffithsA. (2001). Can’t or won’t? Evidence relating to authorship in facilitated communication. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 98–103.
International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Committee on Facilitated Communication. (2014). Report on which the FC position statement is based. Retrieved from http://www.candleaac.com/files/Report_FC_March182.pdf
26.
JacobsonJ. W.FoxxR. M.MulickJ. A. (2005). Facilitated communication: The ultimate fad treatment. In JacobsonJ. W.FoxxR. M.MulickJ. A. (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities (pp. 63–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
JacobsonJ. W.MulickJ.SchwartzA. A. (1995). A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and antiscience. American Psychologist, 50, 750–765.
28.
Janzen-WildeM. L.DuchanJ. F.HigginbothamD. J. (1995). Successful use of facilitated communication with an oral child. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38, 658–676.
29.
Kasa-HendricksonC.BroderickA. A.HansonD. (2009). Sorting out speech: Understanding multiple methods of communication for persons with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 116–133.
30.
KiiskinenJ. (2000, March). M-i-n-ä o-l-e-n t-u-o-m-a-s [I a-m t-u-o-m-a-s]. Helsingin Sanomat Kuukausiliite, pp. 53–56.
31.
MazerolleP.LegoszM. (2012). Facilitated communication & augmented and alternative communication: A review. Brisbane: Griffith University.
32.
MonteeB. B.MiltenbergerR. G.WittrockD. (1995). An experimental analysis of facilitated communication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 189–200.
33.
MostertM. P. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 287–313.
34.
MostertM. P. (2010). Facilitated communication and its legitimacy—Twenty-first century developments. Exceptionality, 18, 31–41.
35.
MostertM. P. (2014). An activist approach to debunking FC. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 203–210.
36.
NiemiJ.Kärnä-LinE. (2002). Grammar and lexicon in facilitated communication: A linguistic authorship analysis of a Finnish case. Mental Retardation, 40, 347–357.
37.
NiemiJ.Kärnä-LinE. (2003). Four vantage points to the language performance and capacity of human beings: response to Saloviita and Sariola. Mental Retardation, 41, 380-381.
38.
PfungstO. (1911). Clever Hans (the horse of Mr. von Osten). A contribution to experimental animal and human psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
39.
ProbstP. (2005). “Communication unbound–or unfound”?–Ein integratives Literatur-Review zur Wirksamkeit der “Gestützten Kommunikation” (“Facilitated Communication/FC”) bei nichtsprechenden autistischen und intelligenzgeminderten Personen [An integrated literature review on the functioning of facilitated communication among persons with autism and intellectual disability]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 53(2), 93–128.
40.
RegalR. A.RooneyJ. R.WandasT. (1994). Facilitated communication: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 345–355.
SaloviitaT.SariolaH. (2003). Authorship in facilitated communication: A re-analysis of a case of assumed representative authentic writing. Mental Retardation, 41, 374–379.
43.
ScopesiA.ZanobiniM.CresciL. R. (2003). Aspetti semantici e stilitici della produzione di un bambino autistico in situazione di comunicazione facilitata [Semantic and stylistic aspects of the texts produced by a child with autism through facilitated communication]. Rivista di Psycolinguistica Applicata, 2–3, 83–105.
44.
SimpsonR.MylesB. (1995). Effectiveness of facilitated communication with children and youth with autism. Journal of Special Education, 28, 424–439.
45.
StubblefieldA. (2011). Sound and fury: When opposition to facilitated communication functions as hate speech. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31, 1–22.
46.
TuzziA. (2009). Grammar and lexicon in individuals with autism: A quantitative analysis of a large Italian corpus. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 373–385.
47.
TuzziA.CeminM.CastagnaM. (2004). “Moved deeply I am.” Autistic language in texts produced with FC. Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles, 7, 1097–1105.
48.
WegnerD. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. London, England: Bradford Books.
49.
WehrenfennigA.SurianL. (2008). Autismo e comunicazione facilitate: una rassegna degli studi sperimentali [Autism and facilitated communication: A review of experimental studies]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 12, 437–464.
50.
WheelerD. L.JacobsonJ. W.PaglieriR. A.SchwartzA. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 31, 49–60.
51.
ZanobiniM.ScopesiA. (2001). La comunicazione facilitata in un bambino autistico [Facilitated communication of a child with autism]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 3, 395–421.
