Adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and significant intellectual disability (ID) often have limited speech communication abilities. Abundant research supports use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to enhance skills of children with ASD and ID, but less research has examined efficacy of AAC with non-speaking adults. In this study, three adults with ASD and significant ID were taught basic functional communication using the iPod Touch® with MyTalk Mobile® software within a single-case, multiple-probe across-subjects design. The iPod Touch® taught with most-to-least prompting increased participants’ independent manding, participants were able to discriminate between picture symbols, and participants’ manding generalized to a naturalistic setting with typically available preferred items. Implementation of AAC coincided with increases in speech for one participant. Results illustrate how an applied behavior analysis approach incorporating a speech generating device is effective in teaching communication to adults with ASD and significant ID.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
BockS. J.StonerJ. B.BeckA. R.HanleyL.ProchnowJ. (2005). Increasing functional communication in non-speaking preschool children: Comparison of PECS and VOCA. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 264–278.
3.
BoyleC. A.BouletS.SchieveL. A.CohenR. A.BlumbergS. J.Yeargin-AllsoppM.. . . KoganM. D. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US Children, 1997-2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042.
4.
CaseyS. D.MericalC. L. (2006). The use of functional communication training without additional treatment procedures in an inclusive school setting. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 46–54.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 Years—Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 Sites, United States, 2010. Surveillance Summaries, 63, 1–21.
6.
ConleyJ. (2012, March). Can the iPad address the needs of students with cognitive impairments by meeting IEP goals? In RestaP. (Ed.), Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2012(1), pp. 3986–3990). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
7.
DeLeonI. G.IwataB. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.
8.
DuffyC.HealyO. (2011). Spontaneous communication in autism spectrum disorder: A review of topographies and interventions. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 977–983.
9.
DurandV. M.CarrE. G. (1991). Functional communication training to reduce challenging behavior: Maintenance and application in new settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 251–264.
10.
DurandV. M.MergesE. (2001). Functional communication training: A contemporary behavior analytic intervention for problem behaviors. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 110–119.
11.
FisherW.PiazzaC.BowmanL. G.AmariA. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15–25.
12.
FisherW.PiazzaC.CataldoM.HarrellR.JeffersonG.ConnerR. (1993). Functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 23–36.
13.
FrostL.BondyA. (2002). The picture exchange communication system. Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Products.
14.
GanzJ. B.SimpsonR. L. (2004). Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the picture exchange communication system in children with characteristics of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 395–409.
15.
GevarterC.O’ReillyM. F.RojeskiL.SammarcoN.SigafoosJ.LancioniG. E.LangR. (2014). Comparing acquisition of AAC-based mands in three young children with autism spectrum disorder using iPad applications with different display and design elements. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 2464–2474.
16.
GosnellJ.CostelloJ.ShaneH. (2011). Using a clinical approach to answer “what communication Apps should we use?”Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 87–96.
17.
HammondD. L.WhatleyA. D.AyresK. M.GastD. L. (2010). Effectiveness of video modeling to teach iPod use to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 525–538.
18.
HendricksD. R.WehmanP. (2009). Transition from school to adulthood for youth with autism spectrum disorders: Review and recommendations. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 77–88.
19.
HetzroniO. E.RothT. (2003). Effects of a positive support approach to enhance communicative behaviors of children with mental retardation who have challenging behaviors. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 95–105.
20.
HewittA. S.StancliffeR. J.SirekA.Hall-LandeJ.TaubS.EnglerJ.. . . MoseleyC. R. (2012). Characteristics of adults with autism spectrum disorder who use adult developmental disability services: Results from 25 US states. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 741–751.
21.
HillK. (2010). Advances in augmentative and alternative communication as quality-of-life technology. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 21, 43–58.
22.
HongE. R.GanzJ. B.GillilandW.NinciJ. (2014). Teaching caregivers to implement an augmentative and alternative communication intervention to an adult with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 570–580.
23.
KingM. L.TakeguchiK.BarryS. E.RehfeldtR. A.BoyerV. E.MathewsT. L. (2014). Evaluation of the iPad in the acquisition of requesting skills for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1107–1120.
24.
KurtzP. F.BoelterE. W.JarmolowiczD. P.ChinM. D.HagopianL. P. (2011). An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2935–2942.
25.
LaarhovenT. V.JohnsonJ. W.Laarhoven-MyersT. V.GriderK. L.GriderK. M. (2009). The effectiveness of using video iPod as a prompting device in employment settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 119–141.
26.
LangR.SigafoosJ.van der MeerL.CarnettA.GreenV. A.LancioniG.O’ReillyM. F. (2014). Teaching functional communication to adults with autism spectrum disorders. In TincaniM.BondyA. (Eds.), Adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder: Evidence-based and promising interventions (pp. 118–139). New York, NY: Guilford.
27.
LorahE. R.CrouserJ.GilroyS. P.TincaniM.HantulaD. (2014). Within stimulus prompting to teach symbol discrimination using an iPad® speech generating device. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 335–346. doi:10.1007/s10882-014-9369-1
28.
LorahE. R.ParnellA.WhitbyP. S.HantulaD. (2014). A systematic review of tablet computers and portable media players as speech generating devices for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2314-4
29.
LorahE. R.TincaniM.DodgeJ.GilroyS.HickeyA.HantulaD. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad™ as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25, 637–649.
30.
MillarD. C.LightJ. C.SchlosserR. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
31.
MirendaP. (2001). Autism, augmentative communication, and assistive technology: What do we really know?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 141–151.
32.
MirendaP. (2003). Toward a functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism, manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Learning, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.
33.
OliveM. L.delaCruzB.DavisT. N.ChanJ. M.LangR. B.O’ReillyM. F.DicksonS. M. (2007). The effects of enhanced milieu teaching and a voice output communication aid on the requesting of three children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1505–1513.
34.
OrsmondG. I.KraussM. W.SeltzerM. M. (2004). Peer relationships and social and recreational activities among adolescents and adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 245–256.
35.
SchepisM. M.ReidD. H.BehrmannM. M.SuttonK. A. (1998). Increasing communicative interactions of young children with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 561–578.
36.
SchlosserR. W.BelfioreP. J.NigamR.BlischakD.HetzroniO. (1995). The effects of speech output technology in the learning of graphic symbols. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 537–549.
37.
SchlosserR. W.WendtO. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230.
38.
SennottS.BowkerA. (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145.
39.
ShinoharaK.WobbrockJ. O. (2011, May). In the shadow of misperception: Assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 705–714). New York, NY: Association for Computer Machinery.
40.
StillK.RehfeldtR. A.WhelanR.MayR.DymondS. (2014). Facilitating requesting skills using high-tech augmentative and alternative communication devices with individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1184–1199. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.003
41.
TincaniM. (2004). Comparing the picture exchange communication system and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 152–163.
42.
TincaniM.CrozierS.AlazettaL. (2006). The picture exchange communication system: Effects on manding and speech for school-aged children with autism. Education & Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 177–184.
43.
TincaniM.DevisK. (2011). Quantitative synthesis and component analysis of single-participant studies on the picture exchange communication system. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 458–470.
44.
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). 30th annual report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2008. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
Van LaarhovenT.JohnsonJ. W.Van Laarhoven-MyersT.GriderK. L.GriderK. M. (2009). The effectiveness of using a video iPod as a prompting device in employment settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 119–141.
