This study investigated the effects of tact prompts on the acquisition and retention of divergent intraverbal responding to categorical questions involving conditional discriminations. A 6-year-old boy with autism participated in the study. A multiple probe design across behaviors was used. A tact-prompt procedure was implemented. The results suggested that the tact-prompt procedure was effective to establish and increase the number of divergent intraverbal responses to questions across two categories. The child spontaneously emitted novel responses during training and generalization probe sessions, indicating occurrences of response generalization after divergent intraverbal training. Maintenance probes showed that divergent intraverbal responses were maintained at high levels for all target categorical questions 3 weeks after the completion of training.
AxeJ. B. (2008). Conditional discrimination in the intraverbal relation: A review and recommendations for future research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 159–174.
2.
BraamS. J.PolingA. (1983). Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through transfer of stimulus control procedures: Classification of verbal responses. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 4, 279–302.
3.
CoonJ. T.MiguelC. F. (2012). The role of increased exposure to transfer-of-stimulus-control procedures on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 657–666.
4.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
EikesethS.SmithD. P. (2013). An analysis of verbal stimulus control in intraverbal behavior: Implications for practice and applied research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 125–135.
6.
GoldsmithT. R.LeBlancL. A.SautterR. A. (2007). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 1–13.
7.
HensonF. O.II. (1975). An investigation of the effects of token reinforcement on divergent verbal responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 459.
8.
IngvarssonE. T.HollobaughT. (2011). A comparison of prompting tactics to establish intraverbal responding in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 659–664.
9.
IngvarssonE. T.LeD. D. (2011). Further evaluation of prompting tactics for establishing intraverbal responding in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 75–93.
10.
LucianoM. C. (1986). Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of productive intraverbal behavior through transfer of stimulus control procedures. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 1–20.
11.
MichaelJ.PalmerD. C.SundbergM. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 3–22.
12.
MiguelC. F.PétursdóttirA. I.CarrJ. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.
13.
PartingtonJ. W.BaileyJ. S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18.
14.
RoidG. H. (2003). Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales (5th ed.). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
15.
RuncoM. A.AcarS. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.
16.
SkinnerB. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.
17.
SundbergM. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: AVB Press.
18.
SundbergM. L.PartingtonJ. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts.
19.
SundbergM. L.SundbergC. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 23–43.
20.
TorranceP. E. (1990). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.
21.
VincentA. S.DeckerB. P.MumfordM. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A Test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178.
22.
WatkinsC.Pack-TeixeiraL. L.HowardJ. S. (1989). Teaching intraverbal behavior to severely retarded children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 69–81.
23.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth edition (WISC-IV). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
