This study examined the effects of delayed recording on the accuracy of data recorded by special educators serving students with high- or low-incidence disabilities. A multi-element design was used to compare the accuracy of data recorded across three conditions: (a) immediately after a student’s target behavior occurred, (b) immediately after the conclusion of the instructional lesson, and (c) 3 hr after the conclusion of the instructional lesson. Results indicated special educators achieved higher levels of agreement recording data immediately after a student’s target behavior occurred and immediately after the conclusion of the instructional lesson.
BabkieA. M.ProvostM. C. (2004). Teachers as researchers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 260–268.
2.
BarlowD. H.HersenM. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
3.
BoardmanA. G.ArguellesM. E.VaughnS.HughesM. T.KlingnerJ. (2005). Special education teachers views of research-based practices. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 168–180.
4.
BrownF.LehrD.SnellM. E. (2006). Conducting and using student assessment. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed.; pp. 73–121). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
5.
FarlowL. J.SnellM. E. (1989). Teacher use of student performance data to make instructional decisions: Practices in programs for students with moderate to profound disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14, 13–22.
6.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.ToddA. W. (2001). “Data” need not be a four-letter word: Using data to improve school wide discipline. Beyond Behavior, 11, 20–26.
7.
JonesM. L. (2009). A study of novice special educators’ view of evidence-based practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 101–120. doi:10.1177/0888406409333777
8.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
9.
Lewis-PalmerT.SugaiG.LarsonS. (1999). Using data to guide decisions about program implementation and effectiveness. Effective School Practices, 17, 47–53.
10.
LoganK. (1991). An analysis of the accuracy of student performance data recorded by teachers under three conditions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta.
11.
McDuffieK. A.ScruggsT. E. (2008). The contributions of qualitative research to discussions of evidence-based practice in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 91–97.
12.
MungerG.SnellM. E.LoydB. H. (1988). How often do you need to collect student performance data? A study of the effects of frequency of probe data collection and graph characteristics on teachers’ visual inference. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED310560)
13.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
14.
SimonsenB.ShawS. F.Faggella-LubyM.SugaiG.CoyneM. D.RheinB.. . . AlfanoM. (2010). A school wide model for service delivery: Redefining special educators as interventionists. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 17–23. doi:10.1177/0741932508324396
15.
Taber-DoughtyT.JasperA. D. (2012). Does latency in recording data make a difference? Confirming the accuracy of teachers’ data. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 168–176. doi:10.1177/1088357612451121
16.
UtleyB. L.ZigmondN.StrainP. S. (1987). How various forms of data affect teacher analysis of student performance. Exceptional Children, 53, 411–422.
17.
VannestK. J.Temple-HarveyK. K.MasonB. A. (2009). Adequate yearly progress for students with emotional and behavioral disorders through research-based practices. Preventing School Failure, 53, 73–83.
18.
WaltonW. T. (1985). Educators’ responses to methods of collecting, storing, and analyzing behavioral data. Journal of Special Education Technology, 7, 50–55.
