Independence is the ultimate goal for students with disabilities, including secondary students with autism. One avenue targeted for increasing independence and decreasing prompt-dependency is through self-monitoring. In this study, investigators sought to determine whether a difference exists in levels of task independence when three students with autism complete food preparation tasks while self-monitoring using a low-tech treatment (paper/pencil) and high-tech treatment (iPad). Although both interventions decreased the need for prompting thereby increasing independence, students needed less assistance when using the iPad. Students also maintained their levels of independence in food preparation following summer vacation. Social validity interviews indicated students preferred self-monitoring with the iPad over the paper/pencil.
AgranM.SinclairT.AlperS.CavinM.WehmeyerM. L.HughesC. (2005). Using self-monitoring to increase following-direction skills of students with moderate to severe disabilities in general education. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 3–13.
2.
BouckE. C.SatsangiR.BartlettW.WengP. (2012). Promoting independence through assistive technology: Evaluating audio recorders to support grocery shopping. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 462–473.
3.
BruhnA.WattS. (2012). Improving behavior by using multicomponent self-monitoring within a targeted reading intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 38, 3–17.
4.
CihakD. F.WrightR.AyresK. M. (2010). Use of self-modeling static-picture prompts via a handheld computer to facilitate self-monitoring in the general education classroom. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 45, 136–149.
5.
CrabtreeT.Alber-MorganS. R.KonradM. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring of story elements on the reading comprehension of high school seniors with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 187–203.
6.
DawsonG.WatlingR. (2000). Interventions to facilitate auditory, visual, and motor integration in autism: A review of the evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 415–421.
7.
GanzJ. B.SigafoosJ. (2005). Self-monitoring: Are young adults with MR and autism able to utilize cognitive strategies independently?Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 24–33.
8.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
GastD. L.SpriggsA. D. (2010). Visual analysis of graphic data. In GastD. L. (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 199–233). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
GulchakD. (2008). Using a mobile handheld computer to teach a student with an emotional and behavioral disorder to self-monitor attention. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 567–581.
11.
HarrisK. R.FriedlanderB. D.SaddlerB.FrizzelleR.GrahamS. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–156.
12.
HolifieldC.GoodmanJ.HazelkornM.HeflinL. J. (2010). Using self-monitoring to increase attending to task and academic accuracy in children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 230–238.
13.
HughesC.CopelandS. R.AgranM.WehmeyerM. L.RodiM. S.PresleyJ. A. (2002). Using self-monitoring to improve performance in general education high school classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 262–272.
14.
HumeK.LoftinR.LantzJ. (2009). Increasing independence in autism spectrum disorders: A review of three focused interventions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1329–1338.
KimM. C.HannafinM. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56, 403–417.
17.
LeeS. H.SimpsonR. L.ShogrenK. A. (2007). Effects and implications of self management for students with autism: A meta-analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 2–13.
18.
LeggeD. B.DeBarR. M.Alber-MorganS. R. (2010). The effects of self monitoring with motivAider [R] on the on-task behavior of fifth and sixth graders with autism and other disabilities. Journal of Behavior Assessment and Intervention in Children, 1, 43–52.
19.
LienemannT. O.ReidR. (2006). Using self-regulated strategy development to improve expository writing with students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Exceptional Children, 76, 471–486.
20.
ParkerD.KampsD. (2011). Effects of task analysis and self-monitoring for children with autism in multiple social settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26, 131–142.
21.
SmithL. E.MaennerM. J.SeltzerM. M. (2012). Developmental trajectories in adolescents and adults with autism: The case of daily living skills. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51, 622–631.
22.
SnellM. E.BrownF. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
23.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, you and adults with disabilities? In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 15–34). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
WehmeyerM. L.GragoudasS.ShogrenK. (2006). Self-determination, student involvement, and leadership development. In WehmanP. (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (pp. 41–70). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
WehmeyerM. L.HughesC.AgranM.GarnerN.YeagerD. (2003). Student directed learning strategies to promote the progress of students with intellectual disability in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7, 415–428.
26.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
27.
WhiteO. R.HaringN. G. (1980). Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
28.
WoleryM.GastD. L.HammondD. (2010). Comparative intervention designs. In GastD. L. (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 329–381). New York, NY: Routledge.
