Repetitive behavior is a hallmark feature of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and can have adverse consequences related to social stigma and low rates of skill acquisition. Basic research suggests that variability, or the extent to which one response differs from previous responses, is amenable to antecedent and consequence manipulations. This article describes the concept of variability, synthesizes the findings of 14 recent studies on interventions to increase the variability of behavior in individuals with ASD, and proposes preliminary guidelines for practitioners that focus on building response repertoires, implementing contingencies to produce and maintain variability, and incorporating prompts to vary responding.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AntonitisJ. J. (1951). Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 273–281. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14888834
3.
ArgottP. (2010). Increasing the variability of verbal responding in children and adolescents with autism using a conjunctive-differential reinforcement schedule (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York, New York City.
4.
BernsteinH.SturmeyP. (2008). Effects of fixed-ratio schedule values on concurrent mands in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 362–370. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2007.09.001
5.
BetzA. M.HigbeeT. S.KelleyK. N.SellersT. P.PollardJ. S. (2011). Increasing response variability of mand frames with script training and extinction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 357–362. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-357
6.
BodfishJ. W. (2004). Treating the core features of autism: Are we there yet?Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10, 318–326. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20045
7.
DenneyJ.NeuringerA. (1998). Behavioral variability is controlled by discriminative stimuli. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 154–162.
8.
EschJ.EschB. (2009). Increasing vocal variability in children with autism using a lag schedule of reinforcement. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 73–78. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779075/
9.
HarrisS. L.DelmolinoL. (2002). Applied behavior analysis: Its application in the treatment of autism and related disorders in young children. Infants & Young Children, 14(3), 11–17.
10.
HeldtJ.SchlingerH. D. (2012). Increased variability in tacting under a lag 3 schedule of reinforcement. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 28, 131–136.
11.
Koehler-PlattenK.GrowL.SchulzeK. A.BertoneT. (2013). Using a lag reinforcement schedule to increase phonemic variability in children with autism spectrum disorders. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 71–83.
12.
LeeR. (2007). The effects of script-fading and a lag-1 schedule on varied responding in children with autism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York, New York City.
13.
LeeR.McComasJ. J.JaworJ. (2002). The effects of differential and lag reinforcement schedules on varied verbal responding by individuals with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 391–402. doi:10.1901/jaba.2002.35-391
14.
LeeR.SturmeyP. (2006). The effects of lag schedules and preferred materials on variable responding in students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 421–428. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0080-7
15.
LeeR.SturmeyP.FieldsL. (2007). Schedule-induced and operant mechanisms that influence response variability: A review and implications for future investigations. The Psychological Record, 57, 429–455.
16.
LeekhamS. R.PriorM. R.UljarevicM. (2011). Restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders: A review of research in the last decade. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 562–593. doi:10.1037/a0023341
17.
MillerN.NeuringerA. (2000). Reinforcing variability in adolescents with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 151–165. doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-151
18.
NapolitanoD. A.SmithT.ZarconeJ. R.GoodkinK.McAdamD. B. (2010). Increasing response diversity in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 265–271. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-265
19.
National Autism Center. (2009). National Standards Report. Randolph, MA: Author.
20.
NeuringerA. (2002). Operant variability: Evidence, functions, and theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 672–705. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12613672
21.
NewmanB.ReineckeD. R.MeinbergD. L. (2000). Self-management of varied responding in three students with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 15, 145–151. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-078X(200004/06)15:2<145::AID-BIN50>3.3.CO;2-V
22.
PageS.NeuringerA. (1985). Variability is an operant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 429–452. doi:10.1037//0097-7403.11.3.429
23.
RappJ. T.VollmerT. R. (2005). Stereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 527–547. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.005
24.
SchwartzB. (1982). Failure to produce response variability with reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 171–181.
25.
SellersT. P. (2011). Increasing mand variability in preschoolers with autism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utah State University, Logan.
26.
StokesT. F.BaerD. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
27.
SusaC.SchlingerH. D. (2012). Using a lag schedule to increase variability of verbal responding in an individual with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 28, 125–130.
28.
TathamT. A.WanchisenB. A.HinelineP. N. (1993). Effects of fixed and variable ratios on human behavioral variability. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 349–359.
