General education placement of students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has increased at a rate faster than all other disability categories combined. As more children are diagnosed with ASD and expected to meet the same academic standards as their neurotypical peers, there is a demand for effective educational strategies. Using a multiple-baseline across participants design, seven cognitive strategies and three meta-cognitive strategies from the Solve it! Problem Solving Routine were taught to three adolescents with ASD. Percent of correct responses on word problems improved immediately upon implementation of the intervention. A peer comparison validation strategy was used to compare participants’ accuracy with the class average. All three participants got more problems correct during intervention when compared with their peers; this effect persisted for two participants during maintenance. The impact of the characteristics of ASD on the use of each strategy implemented within the Solve It! Problem Solving Routine is discussed.
AlbertoP. A.TroutmanA. C. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
2.
BarnhillG. P. (2001). What is Asperger?Intervention in School and Clinic, 36, 259–265.
3.
BarnhillG. P.HagiwaraT.MylesB.SimpsonR. L. (2000). Asperger syndrome: A study of the cognitive profiles of 37 children and adolescents. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 146–153.
4.
BebkoJ.RicciutiC. (2008). Executive functioning and memory strategy use in children with autism. Autism, 4, 299–320.
5.
BertrandJ.MarsA.BoyleC.BoveF. (2001). Prevalence of autism in a United States population: The Brick Township, New Jersey, investigation. Pediatrics, 108, 1155–1161.
6.
ChungK. K. H.TamT. H. (2005). Effects of cognitive-based instruction on mathematical problem solving by learners with mild intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 30, 207–216.
7.
CoughlinJ.MontagueM. (2010). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving ability of adolescents with spina bifida. Journal of Special Education, 45, 171–183.
DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–590.
10.
DonnellyJ. A. (2005, July). Strategies to promote academic achievement for students on the autism spectrum. Paper presented at the National Conference & Exposition on Autism Spectrum Disorders, Nashville, TN.
11.
FarrugiaS.HudsonJ. (2006). Anxiety in adolescents with Asperger syndrome: Negative thoughts, behavioral problems and life interference. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 25–35.
12.
FeinD.DunnM.AllenD. A.AramD. M.HallN.MorrisR.WilsonB. C. (1996). Language and neuropsychological findings. In RapinI. (Ed.), Preschool children with inadequate communication: Developmental language disorder, autism, low IQ (Clinics in Developmental Medicine, No. 139) (pp. 123–154). London, England: MacKeith.
13.
Florida Department of Education. (2007). Florida comprehensive assessment test technical report field test supplement for test administration in spring 2006. Unpublished manuscript, Florida Department of Education, Tallahassee, FL.
14.
GrearyD. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4–15.
15.
GriswoldD. E.BarnhillG. P.MylesB.HagiwaraT.SimpsonR. (2002). Asperger syndrome and academic achievement. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17, 94–102.
16.
HappeF.BoothR.CharltonR.HughesC. (2006). Executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Examining profiles across domains and ages. Brain and Cognition, 61, 25–39.
17.
HudsonP.MillerS. P.ButlerF. (2006). Adapting and merging explicit instruction within reform based mathematics classrooms. American Secondary Education, 35, 19–32.
18.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC. C.Deatline-BuchmanA.SczesniakE. (2007). Mathematical word problem solving in third grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 283–302.
19.
MartensB. K.WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.DarveauxD. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198.
20.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2003a). Ability profiles in children with autism: Influence of age and IQ. Autism, 7, 65–80.
21.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2003b). Analysis of the WISC-III, Stanford-Binet IV, and academic achievement test scores in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 65–80.
MontagueM. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230–248.
24.
MontagueM. (2003). Solve it! A practical approach to teaching mathematical problem solving skills. Reston, VA: Exceptional Innovations.
25.
MontagueM.ApplegateB.MarquardK. (1993). Cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 251–261.
26.
MontagueM.BosC. (1986). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26–33.
27.
MontagueM.DietzS. (2009). Evaluating the evidence base for cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem solving. Exceptional Children, 75, 285–302.
28.
MylesB. S.SimpsonR. L. (2002). Asperger syndrome: An overview of characteristics. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17, 132–137.
29.
National Autism Center. (2009). The National Autism Center’s national standards project: Findings and conclusions. Randolph, MA: Author.
30.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Available from www.nctm.org
31.
National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Committee on educational interventions for children with Autism. Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32.
O’ConnorI. M.KleinP. D. (2004). Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 115–127.
33.
PressleyM.Forrest-PressleyD.Elliott-FaustD. L.MillerG. E. (1985). Children’s use of cognitive strategies, how to teach strategies, and what to do if they can’t be taught. In PressleyM.BrainerdC. J. (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children (pp. 1–47). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
34.
PressleyM.HildenK. (2006). Cognitive strategies: Production deficiencies and successful strategy instruction everywhere. In KuhnD.SieglerR. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (Vol. 2, 6th ed., pp. 511–556). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
35.
RutterM.LeCouteurA.LordC. (2003). ADI-R: Autism diagnostic interview-revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
36.
SansotiF. J.Powell-SmithK. A. (2008). Using computer-presented social stories and video models to increase the communication skills of children with spectrum disorders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 162–178.
37.
SchumakerJ. B. (2009). Teacher preparation and professional development in effective learning strategy instruction. Nashville, TN: National Comprehensive Center on Teacher Quality, Vanderbilt University.
38.
SongleeD.MillerS. P.TincaniM.SileoN.PerkinsP. G. (2008). Effects of test-taking strategy instruction on high functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 217–228.
39.
TawneyJ. W.GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
40.
US Department of Education. (2004). The twenty-fourth annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
van GarderenD. (2008). Middle school special education teachers’ instructional practices for solving mathematical word problem solving: An exploratory study. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 132–134.
42.
WagnerM.MarderC.BlackorbyJ.CametoR.NewmanL.LevineP.Davies-MercierE. (2003). The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
43.
WilliamsD. L.GoldsteinG.MinshewN. J. (2006). Profile of memory function in children with autism. Neuropsychology, 20, 21–29.
44.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
45.
XinY. P. (2008). The effect of schema-based instruction in solving mathematics word problems: An emphasis on prealgebraic conceptualization of multiplicative relations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 526–551.
46.
XinY. P.JitendraA. K.Deatline-BuchmanA. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. Journal of Special Education, 39, 181–182.
