We investigated instruction of independent creation of picture activity schedules (PASs) and how four middle school students with intellectual disability used them to complete tasks independently. A withdrawal design (A-BC-B-A-B) was used to evaluate whether the intervention had an effect on the dependent variable and to test for generalization to a community setting in a pre/post format. After instruction on the PAS, participants learned to self-manage a strategy that served as a reminder for the tasks they needed to complete. All participants exhibited increased abilities to complete a sequence of three or five tasks following verbal directions when using the PAS as compared with the conditions where no PAS was utilized. In addition, these results generalized to the community setting of a mall food court. Our findings have implications for enhancing the independent functioning of individuals with intellectual disability and reducing reliance on others, with the potential for greater levels of self-determination.
Beirne-SmithM.PattonJ.KimS. (2006). Mental retardation: An introduction to intellectual disabilities (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
2.
BryanL.GastD. L. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 553–567.
3.
CarsonK.GastD. L.AyresK. M. (2008). Effects of a photo activity schedule book on independent task changes by students with intellectual disabilities in community and school job sites. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23, 269–279.
4.
CihakD.AlbertoP. A.Taber-DoughtyT.GamaR. I. (2006). A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulation strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 89–99.
5.
CopelandS.HughesC. (2000). Acquisition of a picture prompt strategy to increase independent performance. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 294–305.
6.
ElliotC. D. (2007). Differential abilities scale--Second edition (DAS-2). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
7.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
HallL. J.McClannahanL. E.KrantzP. J. (1995). Promoting independence in classrooms by teaching aids to use activity schedules and decreased prompts. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 208–217.
9.
HarrisonP.OaklandT. (2003). Adaptive Behavior. Assessment System (2nd ed.; ABAS-II). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
10.
HenryL.WinfieldJ. (2010). Working memory and educational achievement in children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 354–365.
11.
KrantzP. J.MacDuffM. T.McClannahanL. E. (1993). Programming participation in family activities for children with autism: Parent’s use of photographic activity schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 137–138.
12.
MartinJ. E.Elias-BurgerS.MithaugD. E. (1987). Acquisition and maintenance of time-based task change sequence. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 250–255.
13.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L. (1997). Combination audio/visual self-prompting system for teaching chained tasks to students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 23, 138–153.
14.
RiveraM. O.KoorlandM. A.FueyoV. (2002). Pupil-made pictorial prompts and fading for teaching sight words to a student with learning disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 25, 197–207.
SparrowS. S.CicchettiD.BallaD. A. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales–2nd edition manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc.
17.
SpriggsA. D.GastD. L.AyresK. M. (2007). Using picture activity schedule books to increase on-schedule and on-task behaviors. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 209–223.
18.
Van der MolenM. J.Van LuitJ. E. H.Van der MolenM. W.JongmansM. J. (2010). Everyday memory and working memory in children with mild intellectual disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual Disabilities, 115, 207–217.
19.
WackerD. P.BergW. K.BerrieP.SwattaP. (1985). Generalization and maintenance of complex skills by severely handicapped adolescents following picture prompt training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 329–336.
20.
WechslerD. (2001). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test– Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
21.
WehmeyerM. L.GragoudasS.ShogrenK. (2006). Self-determination, student involvement, and leadership development. In WehmanP. (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (4th ed., pp. 41–70). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
22.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK.RichardsS. (1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behavior of individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 632–642.
23.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
24.
WehmeyerM. L.SchalockR. L. (2001). Self-determination and quality of life: Implications for special education services and supports. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(8), 1–16.
25.
WilkinsonG. S. (1993). WRAT: Wide Range Achievement Test Administration Manual. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range, Inc.
26.
WoleryM.JonesM. A.DoyleP. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities. White Plains, NY: Longman.
27.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock Johnson tests of cognitive abilities and tests of achievement. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
