The effects of latency on the accuracy of data recorded by three special education teachers were examined in this study. Teachers recorded data on the target behaviors of three students with varying disabilities. The accuracy of data recorded was assessed during three time periods: immediately after the target behavior occurred, at the end of the school day, and the following school day. A multielement design was used to evaluate data accuracy. Results were interpreted to confirm that data recorded immediately after a behavior occurred were more accurate and reliable than data documented at the end of the school day or the start of the following school day. In addition, data recorded by each teacher had a mean agreement of 97% or above for the time period immediately after a student’s behavior occurred. Furthermore, each teacher reported that it was beneficial to record data immediately after the target behavior occurred. Implications and future research directions are provided.
AlbertoP. A.TroutmanA. C. (2012). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
BabkieA. M.ProvostM. C. (2004). Teachers as researchers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 260–268.
3.
BarlowD. H.HersenM. (1984). Single case experimental designs (2nd ed.). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
4.
BoardmanA. G.ArguellesM. E.VaughnS.HughesM. T.KlingnerJ. (2005). Special education teachers views of research-based practices. Journal of Special Education, 39, 168–180.
5.
BrownF.SnellM. E.LehrD. (2006). Meaningful assessment. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.) (pp. 173-206). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6.
BurnsM. K.YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 43, 3–11.
7.
CookeN.HewardW. L.TestD. W.SpoonerF.CoursonF. H. (1991). Student performance data in the classroom: Measurement and evaluation of student progress. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 155–161.
8.
FarlowL. J.SnellM. E. (1989). Teacher use of student performance data to make instructional decisions: Practices in programs for students with moderate to profound disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14, 13–22.
9.
FuchsL. S. (1986). Monitoring progress among mildly handicapped pupils: Review of current practice and research. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 5–12.
10.
GableR. A.ArllenN. L.EvansW. H.WhinneryK. M. (1997). Strategies for evaluating collaborative mainstream instruction: “Let the data be our guide.”Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 41, 153–158.
11.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.ToddA. W. (2001). “Data” need not be a four-letter word: Using data to improve schoolwide discipline. Beyond Behavior, 11, 20–26.
12.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
13.
JonesM. L. (2009). A study of novice special educators’ view of evidence-based practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 101–120.
14.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
Lewis-PalmerT.SugaiG.LarsonS. (1999). Using data to guide decisions about program implementation and effectiveness. Effective School Practices, 17(4), 47–53.
16.
LoganK. (1991). An analysis of the accuracy of student performance data recorded by teachers under three conditions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta.
17.
McDuffieK. A.ScruggsT. E. (2008). The contributions of qualitative research to discussions of evidence-based practice in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 91–97.
18.
MungerG.SnellM. E.LoydB. H. (1988). How often do you need to collect student performance data? A study of the effects of frequency of probe data collection and graph characteristics on teachers’ visual inference. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED310560)
19.
ParsonB. S.BaerD. M. (1986). The graphic analysis of data. In PolingA.FuquaR. W. (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis (pp. 157–184). New York, NY: Plenum.
20.
RathgenE. (2006). In the voice of teachers: The promise and challenge of participating in classroom-based research for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 580–591.
21.
SandallS. R.SchwartzI. S.LacroixB. (2004). Interventionists’ perspectives about data collection in integrated early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 161–174.
22.
SimonsenB.ShawS. F.Faggella-LubyM.SugaiG.CoyneM. D.RheinB.. . . AlfanoM. (2010). A schoolwide model for service delivery: Redefining special educators as interventionists. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 17–23.
WaltonW. T. (1985). Educators’ responses to methods of collecting, storing, and analyzing behavioral data. Journal of Special Education Technology, 7, 50–55.
25.
WhiteO. R.HaringN. G. (1980). Exceptional teaching. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
26.
WhiteO. R.LibertyK. A. (1976). Behavioral assessment and precise educational measurement. In HaringN. G.SchiefelbuschR. L. (Eds.), Teaching special children (pp. 31–71). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27.
WoleryM.BaileyD. B.SugaiG. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
YsseldykeJ. E.NaniaP. A.ThurlowM. L. (1985). Instructional decision-making practices of teachers of preschool handicapped children: Research Report No. 3. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED269952)
