A milieu teaching sequence was used to train photograph exchange as a method of requesting to a 7-year-old boy with autism. A multiple baseline design across four items (ball, puzzle, books, bubbles) was used to identify a functional relation between requesting and the milieu teaching sequence. Although performance during intervention was variable, possibly as a result of external factors such as fatigue and irritability, treatment effects were observed in three of four items trained. Results of maintenance probes collected 5 weeks after the study concluded may indicate variations in item salience. Findings were interpreted to support milieu training for this participant. Clinical implications and study limitations are discussed.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2006). Guidelines for speech-language pathologists in diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of autism spectrum disorders across the life span (Guidelines). Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
2.
BondyA. S.FrostL. A. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 9, 1–19.
3.
CarrE. G.DurandV. M. (1985). Reducing behaviors through Functional Communication Training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
4.
FeyM.WarrenS. F.BradyN.FinestackL. H.Bredin-OjaS. L.FairchildM.YoderP. (2006). Early effects of responsivity education/prelinguistic milieu teaching for children with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 526–547.
5.
FlippinM.ReszkaS.WatsonL. (2010). Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 178–195.
6.
FrostL.BondyA. (2002). PECS training manual. Newark, DE: Pyramid Education Consultants.
7.
HancockT. B.KaiserA. P. (2002). The effects of trainer-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 39–54.
8.
KaiserA. P.YoderP. J.KeetzA. (1992). Evaluating milieu teaching. In WarrenS. F.ReichleJ. (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 9–47). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
9.
MancilG. R.ConroyM. A.HaydonT. F. (2009). Effects of a modified milieu therapy intervention on the social communicative behaviors of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 149–163.
10.
MancilG. R.ConroyM. A.NakaoT.AlterP. (2006). Functional communication training in the natural environment: A pilot investigation with a young child with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 615–633.
11.
McLeanL. K.CripeJ. W. (1997). The effectiveness of early intervention for children with communication disorders. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
12.
McReynoldsL. V.KernsK. P. (1983). Single-subject experimental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
13.
National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Committee on Educational Interventions for Children With Autism. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
OgletreeB. (2008). The communicative context of autism. In SimpsonR.MylesB. S. (Eds.), Educating children and youth with autism: Strategies for effective practice (pp. 223–266). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
15.
OgletreeB. T.OrenT. (1998). Program evaluation in classrooms for students with autism: Student outcomes and program processes. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 170–175.
16.
OliveM. L.delaCruzB.DavisT. N.ChanJ. M.LangR. B.O’ReillyM. F.DicksonS. M. (2007). The effects of enhanced milieu teaching and a voice output communication aid on the requesting of three children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1505–1513.
ShumauyS.WetherbyA. M. (2009). Communicative acts of children with autism spectrum disorders in the second year of life. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1139–1156.
19.
SimpsonR. (2001). ABA and students with autism spectrum disorders: Issues and considerations for effective practice. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 68–71.
20.
Sulzer-AzaroffB.HoffmanA. O.HortonC. B.BondyA.FrostL. (2009). The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS): What do the data say?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 89–103.
21.
WarrenS. F.BradyN. C. (2007). The role of maternal responsivity in the development of children with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 330–338.
22.
WarrenS. F.KaiserA. P. (1988). Incidental language teaching: A critical review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 291–299.
23.
WarrenS. F.YoderP. J. (1998). Maternal responsivity predicts the prelinguistic communication intervention that facilitates generalized intentional communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1207–1219.
24.
YoderP. J.StoneW. L. (2006). Research: A randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 698–711.
25.
YoderP. J.WarrenS. F. (2001). Relative treatment effects of two prelinguistic communication interventions on language development in toddlers with developmental delays vary by maternal characteristics. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 224–237.
26.
YoderP. J.WarrenS. F. (2002). Effects of prelinguistic milieu teaching and parent responsivity education on dyads involving children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1297–1310.
