The current study investigated the effectiveness of an integrated word identification and communication intervention for children with complex communication needs. Using a nonconcurrent, multiple baseline design, the study involved three participants who completed 75 lessons across 4 to 6 weeks of instruction. All three participants improved their skills of word identification, developmental spelling, icon sequencing, and expressive communication. Generalization was documented through increases in the frequency of communication using icon sequencing and spelling outside of the instructional program. Implications for the development of integrated word study programs that combine systematic, sequential phonics instruction with instruction in the use of augmentative communication are discussed, along with directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.A. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Baker, B. (1982). Minspeak. Byte, 9, 186—202.
3.
Berninger, V., & Gans, B. (1986). Assessing word processing capability of the nonvocal, nonwriting. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 56—63.
4.
Billingsley, F.F., White, O.R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example . Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229— 241.
Clay, M.M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7.
Coleman-Martin, M.B., Heller, K.W., Cihak, D.F., & Irvine, K.L. (2005). Using computer assisted instruction and the nonverbal reading approach to teach word identification. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 80—90.
8.
Crowe, L.K., Norris, J.A., & Hoffman, P.R. (2000). Facilitating storybook interactions between mothers and their preschoolers with language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21, 131—150.
Cunningham, P.M. (2000a). Phonics they use: Words for reading and writing (3rd ed.). New York: Longman
11.
Cunningham, P.M. (2000b). Systematic sequential phonics they use. New York: Longman.
12.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
13.
Erickson, K.A., & Hanser, G. (2007). Literacy through unity: Word study. Wooster, OH: Prentke Romich.
14.
Fallon, K.A., Light, J., McNaughton, D., Drager, K., & Hammer, C. (2004). The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication . Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1424—1439.
15.
Ferroli, L., & Shanahan, T. (1987). Kindergarten spelling: Explaining its relationship to first-grade reading. In J. B. Readance , & R. S. Baldwin (Eds.), Research in literacy: Merging perspectives (Thirty-sixth yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 93— 99). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
16.
Foley, B.E. (1993). The development of literacy in individuals with severe congenital speech and motor impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 13(2), 16—32.
17.
Gazmararian, J.A., Baker, D.W., Williams, M.V., Parker, R.M., Scott, T.L., Green, D.C., et al. (1999). Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 281, 545—551.
18.
Giordano, G. (1996). Literacy programs for adults with developmental disabilities. San Diego, CA: Singular .
19.
Heller, K.W., Fredrick, L.D., Tumlin, J., & Brineman, D.G. (2002). Teaching decoding for generalization using the nonverbal reading approach. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 19—35.
20.
Hoover, W.A., & Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127—160.
21.
Kamhi, A.G., & Catts, H.W. (1998). Language and reading: Convergences and divergences . In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective (pp. 1— 24). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
Koppenhaver, D., & Yoder, D. (1992). Literacy issues in persons with severe physical and speech impairments. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (Vol. 2, pp. 156—201). New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
Koppenhaver, D.A. (2000). Literacy in AAC: What should be written on the envelope we push?Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 16, 267—277.
25.
Lerman, R.I., & Schmidt, S.R. (1999, May). Functional literacy and labor market outcomes . Paper presented at the conference Helping low-wage workers: Policies for the future, held at the Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
26.
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (1993). Literacy and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): The expectations and priorities of parents and teachers. Topics in Language Disorders, 13(2), 33—46.
27.
Mirenda, P. (1993). Bonding the uncertain mosaic. Augmentative and Alternative. Communication, 9, 3—9.
28.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2005). A first look at the literacy of America's adults in the 21st century. Retrieved January 8, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/naal/PrentkeRomichInc., Unity®, Wooster, OH.
29.
Schillinger, D., Piette, J., Grumbach, K., Wang, F., Wilson, C., Daher, C., et al. (2003). Closing the loop: Physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Archives ofInternal Medicine, 163, 83—90.
30.
Schlosser, R.W. (2003). The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication . Boston: Academic Press.
31.
Sturm, J.M., & Clendon, S.A. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication, language and literacy: Fostering the relationship. Topics in Language Disorders, 24, 76—91.
32.
Udwin, O., & Yule, W. (1990). Expressive language of children with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 6, 108— 114.
33.
Watson, P.J., & Workman, E.A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individual design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 12, 257—259.
34.
Winn, B.D., Skinner, C.H., Allin, J.D., & Hawkins, J.A. (2004). Practicing school consultants can empirically validate interventions: A description and demonstration of the non-concurrent multiple-baseline design. Journal of AppliedSchool Psychology , 20, 109—128.
35.
Yoder, D. (2001). Having my say. Augmentative & AlternativeCommunication, 17, 2—10.
