This qualitative study examined obstacles to literacy for individuals With severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI). Using a constant comparison approach, the authors addressed attitudinal and opportunity barriers to literacy education from the perspective of parents, teachers, university faculty, and administrators involved in literacy education of students With SSPI. Major themes emerged Within the categories of knoWledge, policy, practice, and attitude relating to funding issues, segregation of students With SSPI, use of a life skills curriculum, lack of certification preparation and training in methods and assistive technology, and attitudes that embraced stigmatization and loWered expectations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arksey, H., & Knight, P. (1999). Interview for the social sciences. London: Sage.
2.
Basit, T.N. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative analysis. Educational Research, 45, 143—154.
3.
Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication. Baltimore: Brookes.
4.
Benner, S.M. (1998). Special education issues within the context ofAmerican society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5.
Berg, B.L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences . Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
Bryant, B., & Seay, P. (1998). The Technology Related Assistance Act. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 4—15.
7.
Clay, M.M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Education .
8.
Coleman, P.P. (1991). Literacy lost: A qualitative analysis of the early literacy experiences of preschool children with severe speech and physical impairments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
9.
Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Erickson, K.A. (1995). Literacy and inclusion for students with severe speech and physical impairments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
11.
Erickson, K.A., Koppenhaver, D., & Yoder, D.E. (1994). Literacy and adults with developmental disabilities (Report No. TR94-15). Philadelphia, PA: National Center on Adult Literacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 377340)
12.
Foley, B. (1993). The development of literacy in individuals with severe congenital speech and motor impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 16—32.
13.
Ford, A., Davern, L., & Schnorr, R. (2001). Learners with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 214—231.
14.
House Report No. 103-208 (1993).
15.
Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428—444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P.L. 105-17, 20 U.S.C. §1415.
17.
Jones, M.H., Dayton, G.O., Bernstein, L., Strommen, E.A., Osborne, M., & Watanabe, K. (1966). Pilot study of reading problems in cerebral palsied adults. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 8, 417—427.
18.
Keefe, C.H. (1996). Label-free learning: Supporting learners with disabilities. York, ME: Stenhouse .
19.
Kliewer, C. (1999). Individualizing literacy instruction for young children with moderate to severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 66, 85—100.
20.
Koenig, A.J. (1992). A framework for understanding the literacy for individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 277—283.
21.
Koppenhaver, D., Coleman, P.P., Kalman, S.L., & Yoder, D.E. (1991). The implications of emergent literacy research for children with developmental disabilities. American Speech LanguagePathology, 1, 38—44.
22.
Koppenhaver, D.A., & Yoder, D.E. (1992). Literacy issues in persons with severe speech and physical impairments. In R. Gaylor-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 156—201). New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
Koppenhaver, D., & Yoder, D.E. (1993). Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): What is and what might be. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 1—15.
24.
LeCompte, M.D., & Preissle, J. (1994). Qualitative research: What it is, what it isn't, and how it is done. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 3 pp. 141—163). New York: JAI press.
25.
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (1993). Literacy and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): The expectations and priorities of parents and teachers. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 33—46.
26.
Mike, D.G. (1995). Literacy and cerebral palsy: Factors influencing literacy learning in a self-contained setting. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 627—641.
27.
Nelson, N.W. (1998). Childhood language disorders in context: Infancy through adolescence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
Parette, H. (1997). Assistive technology devices and services. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities , 32, 267—280.
29.
Pierce, P.L., & McWilliams, P.J. (1993). Emerging literacy and children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): Issues and possible intervention strategies. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 47—57.
30.
Pierce, P.L., & Porter, P.B. (1996). Helping persons with disabilities to become literate using assistive technology: Practice and policy suggestions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11, 142—148.
31.
Rauscher, L., & McClintock, M. (1997). Ableism curriculum design . In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 198—225). New York : Routledge.
32.
Resta, P., Bryant, P., Lock, R., & Allan, J. (1998). Infusing a teacher preparation program in learning disabilities with assistive technology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 55—66.
33.
Scherer, M.J. (2000). Living in a state of stuck. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
34.
Steelman, J.D., Pierce, P.L., & Koppenhaver, D.A. (1993). The role of computers in promoting literacy in children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI). Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 76—88.
35.
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Sturm, J. (1998). Literacy development of AAC users. In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 355—390). Baltimore: Brookes.
37.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, 29 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq.
38.
Vellutino, F.R., & Schub, M.J. (1982). Assessment of disorders in formal school language: Disorders in reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 2(4), 20—33.
39.
Willard-Holt, C. (1998). Academic and personality characteristics of gifted students with cerebral palsy: A multiple case study. Exceptional Children, 65, 37—50.
40.
Zaniecki, F. (1934). The method of sociology. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
