This article examines the barriers to brownfield redevelopment through a case study analysis of four cities in two Great Lakes states. Four key barriers are identified and investigated: legal liability, limited information, limited financial resources, and limited demand for the properties. Perceived liability emerges as a dominant barrier, and one that compounds the other three barriers. The article analyzes how and why liability perceptions affect stakeholder behavior and provides lessons learned for promoting brownfield redevelopment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartschC. (1996a, October). Financing brownfield reuse: Role of the public sector in attracting new capital to old sites. Paper presented at Small Cities Conference, Louisville, KY.
2.
BartschC. (1996b, Winter). Paying for our industrial past. Commentary, pp. 14–23.
3.
BartschC. (1997, September). Heard on the hill. Paper presented at Brownfields '97 conference, Kansas City, MO.
4.
BartschC.CollatonE. (1995). Coming clean for economic development: A resource book on environmental cleanup. Washington DC: Northeast Midwest Institute.
5.
BlackJ. T. (1995, June). Brownfields cleanups. Urban Land, pp. 47–51.
6.
CavanaghS. (1995, September). Brownfields dilemma: A voluntary action. Slate Legislature, pp. 30–33.
7.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of1988, Pub. L. No. 96, 42 U.S.C. sec 9601 et seq.
8.
CoffinS. (1996). A review of local planning efforts for brownfield redevelopment: A case study of four cities in Ohio and Michigan. Unpublished master's thesis, Cleveland State University, OH.
9.
Congressional Research Service. (1995). Summaries of environmental laws administered by the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
10.
Cuyahoga County Planning Commission. (1993, August). Cuyahoga County brownfields reuse strategies working group report. Cleveland, OH: Author.
11.
DinsmoreC. (1996, June). State initiatives on brownfields. Urban Land, pp. 37–42.
12.
GlickmanT. (1994). A Superfund retrospective: Past, present, and … future. Elements MSW Management, pp. 78–83.
13.
HenryE.MullerR. (1996, June). Private sector financing considerations for brownfields. Paper presented at the Brownfields Pilot Initiative Conference sponsored by the Institute for Responsible Management and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Baltimore, MD.
IannoneD. (1996a). Increasing public and private capital to brownfields, or how shall we pay for the sins of the past?Infrastructure, 1(4), 18–23.
16.
IannoneD. (1996b, June). Sparking investment in brownfield sites. Urban Land, pp. 43–45, 64.
17.
LeighN. G. (1995, October). The ultimate neighborhood externality: Environmentally suspect and tax-delinquent properties. Paper presented at the fall meeting of the Association Collegiate Schools of Planning, Detroit, MI.
18.
MacfarlaneR.BelkJ.ClarkJ. A. (1994). Confronting the impacts of environmental strict liability on brownfield redevelopment. Environmental Claims Journal, 6(4), 459–479.
19.
Mahoning Valley Brownfields Working Group. (1996, April). The Greater Mahoning Valley brownfield redevelopment project. A grant application submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Brownfields Pilot Project Initiative.
20.
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. (1996). Part 201, one year later. Lansing: Author.
PageG. W.RabinowitzH. (1994). Potential for redevelopment of contaminated brownfield sites. Economic Development Quarterly, 34(3), 353–364.
23.
PortneyP.ProbstK. (1994, Winter). Cleaning up Superfund. Resources, pp. 2–5.
24.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1986, 15 U.S.C § 2601–71.
25.
SimonsR. (1996a, October). Brownfields supply and demand analysis for selected Great Lakes cities. Paper presented at Small Cities Conference, Louisville, KY.
26.
SimonsR. (1996b). Financing environmentally contaminated land and redevelopment in the Great Lakes urban empowerment zones: Technical assistance to EmZ managers (working paper). Cleveland, OH: Great Lakes Environmental Finance Center.
27.
SwartzR. (1994). Michigan's approach to urban redevelopment involving contaminated properties. Economic Development Quarterly, 8(4), 329–337.
28.
SweeneyR. M. (1994). Brownfields restoration and voluntary cleanup legislation. Environmental Lawyer, 2(1). 116–121.
29.
Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 6901–6991k.
30.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1995). The brownfields action agenda. Washington, DC: Author.
31.
YountK. (1993). Fear and loathing in urban America: Environmental risks and the constraints on urban regeneration (Working Paper No. YR-93–3). Louisville, KY: Center for Environmental Management, University of Louisville.
32.
YountK.MeyerP. (1994). Bankers, developers, and new investment in brownfield sites: Environmental concerns and the social psychology of risk. Economic Development Quarterly, 34(3), 338–343.
