AdebayoA. A.LulofsK.HeldewegM. A. (2025). Rule settings focusing on sustainability of public-private partnership infrastructure projects in Nigeria: An IAD-framework based gap analysis. Public Works Management & Policy.
2.
BoinA.Fishbacher-SmithD. (2011). The importance of failure theories in assessing crisis management: The Columbia space shuttle disaster revisited. Policy and Society, 30(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2011.03.003
3.
BoinA.SchulmanP. (2008). Assessing NASA’s safety culture: The limits and possibilities of high‐reliability theory. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1050–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00954.x
4.
BoisjolyR. P.CurtisE. F.MellicanE. (1989). Roger Boisjoly and the challenger disaster: The ethical dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00383335
5.
BoyerE. J.ChenC.ThomasJ. C. (2025). An integrated framework to improve public involvement in public-private partnerships: Aligning participatory modes with informational needs in PPPs. Public Works Management & Policy.
ChangY. W. E.PaiT. Y. (2024). Historical space painting art: Its important role on the creation of space-age era in 1950s. Acta Astronautica, 220, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.04.018
8.
CoxD. W. (1962). The space race. Chilton Books.
9.
DammelJ. (2013). The case for big things: Public value mapping U.S. space policy from sputnik to SpaceX. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/152484
10.
DonahueA. K. (2006). The space shuttle Columbia recovery operation: How collaboration enabled disaster response. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 141–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00674.x
11.
DonahueA. K.O'LearyR. (2012). Do shocks change organizations? The case of NASA. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 395–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur034
12.
EvansJ. (1998). The history and practice of ancient astronomy. Oxford University Press.
13.
ExmeyerP. C.LeeK.SullivanA.HallJ. L. (2026). Still unplugged: Policy diffusion dynamics and local government vehicle fleet electrification. Public Works Management & Policy.
14.
GingerichO. K. (2009). Galileo and the birth of modern astronomy. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 5(S260), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921311002250
15.
GouranD. S.HirokawaR. Y.MartzA. E. (1986). A critical analysis of factors related to decisional processes involved in the challenger disaster. Central States Speech Journal, 37(3), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978609368212
16.
HallJ. L. (2008). The forgotten regional organizations: Creating capacity for economic development. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00841.x
17.
HallJ. L. (2026a). Capacity, constraints, and consequences: Public works strategy for the Mid-21st century. Public Works Management & Policy, 31(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x251403266
18.
HallJ. L. (2026b). Imperialism, infrastructure, and the modern geopolitical chess match: What it takes to ‘win. Public Works Management & Policy, 31(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x261427511
19.
HandbergR. (2014). Human spaceflight and presidential agendas: Niche policies and NASA, opportunity and failure. Technology in Society, 39, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.07.004
20.
HeimannC. L. (1993). Understanding the challenger disaster: Organizational structure and the design of reliable systems. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939051
21.
JohnstonJ. M.RomzekB. S.WoodC. H. (2004). The challenges of contracting and accountability across the federal system: From ambulances to space shuttles. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 34(3), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005035
KayW. D. (1998). Space policy redefined: The reagan administration and the commercialization of space (pp. 237–247). Business and Economic History.
25.
KimM.CollinsB. (2026). Regional transportation planning through intergovernmental collective action: Does planning conformity with federal regulations improve regional air quality?Public Works Management & Policy.
26.
LambrightW. H. (2008a). Government and science: A troubled, critical relationship and what can be done about it. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00830.x
LeeD.Van RyzinG. G. (2020). Bureaucratic reputation in the eyes of citizens: An analysis of US federal agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318769127
32.
LevineA. L. (1985). Commercialization of space: Policy and administration issues. Public Administration Review, 45(5), 562–569. https://doi.org/10.2307/3109931
33.
LevineA. L. (1992). NASA’s organizational structure: The price of decentralization. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/976477
McCurdyH. E. (1991). Organizational decline: NASA and the life cycle of bureaus. Public Administration Review, 51(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/976746
36.
McCurdyH. E. (1992). NASA’s organizational culture. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/976474
37.
McCurdyH. E. (1995). Fiction and imagination: How they affect public administration. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110340
38.
Miller-StevensK.EiswerthM.HajiL. (2026). Working together: A governance perspective of payments for water-based ecosystem services collaboratives. Public Works Management & Policy.
39.
MoeT. M. (1987). An assessment of the positive theory of congressional dominance. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 475–520. https://doi.org/10.2307/439745
RomzekB. S.DubnickM. J. (2018). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. In Democracy, bureaucracy, and the study of administration (pp. 182–204). Routledge.
42.
RoseC. (1976). Feeding the billions from outer space. Public Administration Review, 36(5), 608–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/974245
43.
SadehE. (2006). Public management dynamics of Nasa: Interview with NASA associate administrator Rex Geveden. Astropolitics, 4(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14777620600762899
SchulmanP. R. (1975). Nonincremental policy making: Notes toward an alternative paradigm. American Political Science Review, 69(4), 1354–1370. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955293
TorresC.FowlerL. (2023). Creatively interpreting policy to move science forward: Implementing participatory technology assessment at NASA. The Review of Policy Research, 40(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12509
50.
TrueJ. L.JonesB. D.BaumgartnerF. R. (2019). Punctuated-equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 155–187). Routledge.
51.
WebbJ. E. (1969). Space age management; the large-scale approach. McGraw-Hill.
WerneckeE. S. (2021). Space policy responsiveness in the 21st century: A new approach for examining the relationship between public opinion and NASA funding. In AIAA scitech 2021-0558. AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0558