Current electric vehicle charging infrastructure is significantly inadequate, with the U.S., Europe, and the U.K. requiring over 550%, 5.5-fold, and 350% growth respectively to meet 2030 deployment targets. This shortage of infrastructure limits sustainable mobility and impedes progress toward clean energy goals. Given the substantial investment and complex coordination required, Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) represent a viable mechanism for accelerating infrastructure deployment and are instrumental in achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 17. This study investigates the key barriers facing PPP-driven EV charging initiatives and proposes strategies to enhance their effectiveness.
The objectives of this study were achieved by first conducting a literature review to identify key challenges in PPP-based EV infrastructure. Subsequently, expert input was gathered via structured questionnaires. Finally, Fuzzy DEMATEL, using triangular fuzzy numbers, was applied to visualize cause-effect relationships among the identified factors. The analysis reveals that financial viability and high capital expenditure (C1: 8.107), lack of a regulatory framework (C5: 8.081), grid capacity and reliability (C7: 6.921), and land acquisition hurdles (C8: 6.579) are the most influential barriers to successful PPP implementation. These factors significantly affect investment decisions, policy clarity, and execution efficiency. Other critical challenges include ambiguity in viable business models (C10: 7.216) and complex approval procedures (C4: 5.525). The study recommends targeted policy interventions such as capital subsidies, concessional loans, regulatory streamlining, and decentralized solutions tailored to underserved regions. By uniquely applying Fuzzy DEMATEL to this context, the study offers a structured framework for optimizing PPP models, strengthening public-private collaboration, and accelerating scalable EVCS infrastructure development in India.
AbuduH.SaiR.HossinM. A.BotahE. B. (2024). China’s electric vehicles adoption: Implications for sustainable electricity, transportation, and net-zero emissions. Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy, 3, 1457743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2024.1457743
BagendaB.NdevuZ. (2024). Principal risks associated with public-private partnership projects in Uganda. Public Works Management & Policy, 29(2), 183–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x231167326
4.
BernalD.RaheemA. A.IntiS.WangH. (2024). Assessment of economic viability of direct current fast charging infrastructure investments for electric vehicles in the United States. Sustainability, 16(15), 6701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156701
5.
BhutaniS.PrabakaranD.GuptaN. (2025). Electrification of light commercial vehicles in Urban areas. Transportation Research Procedia, 82, 2425–2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2024.12.196
6.
BilalM.RizwanM. (2020). Electric vehicles in a smart grid: A comprehensive survey on optimal location of charging station. IET Smart Grid, 3(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-stg.2019.0220
7.
BilalM.RizwanM. (2023). Intelligent algorithm based efficient planning of electric vehicle charging station: A case study of metropolitan city of India. Scientia Iranica, 0(0), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2021.57433.5238
8.
ChalloobA. F.Bin RahmatN. A.A/L RamachandaramurthyV. K.Jaleel HumaidiA. (2024). Energy and battery management systems for electrical vehicles: A comprehensive review & recommendations. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 42(1), 341–372. SAGE Publications Ltd STM. https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987231211943
9.
ChenX-P.JiangX.YuX-C.HaoP.XieB. C. (2024). What factors affect the development of public charging infrastructures? A study from the perspective of potential users. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1257121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1257121
10.
DeCorla-SouzaP.HossainM. (2025). New tool to screen financial viability of alternative public–private partnership structures for delivery of electric vehicle-charging infrastructure. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(1), 1. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16010030
11.
DhairiyasamyR.GabirielD.BunphengW.KitC. C. (2024). A comprehensive analysis of India’s electric vehicle battery supply chain: Barriers and solutions. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00595-7
12.
Ebadi TorkayeshA.HendianiS.WaltherG.VenghausS. (2024). Fueling the future: Overcoming the barriers to market development of renewable fuels in Germany using a novel analytical approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 316(3), 1012–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.02.039
13.
EtukudohE. A.AdefemiA.IlojianyaV. I.Aniekan Akpan UmohKenneth Ifeanyi IbekweZamathula Queen Sikhakhane Nwokediegwu (2024). A review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 1440–1452. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173
14.
FakhrzadM-B.FirozpourM-R.Hosseini NasabH. (2021). A fuzzy DEMATEL approach for evaluating the risk factors: (case study: The instruction center of Iran’s national oil company). RAIRO - Operations Research, 55(4), 2525–2543. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021109
15.
FalchettaG.NoussanM. (2021). Electric vehicle charging network in Europe: An accessibility and deployment trends analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 102813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102813
16.
FilonchykM.PetersonM. P.YanH.GusevA.ZhangL.YangS. (2024). Greenhouse gas emissions and reduction strategies for the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitters. Science of the Total Environment, 944, 173895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173895
17.
GhorbaniM.EbrahimiH.VosoughiS.EskandariD.Moradi HanifiS.MandaliH. (2024). Analyzing the influential factors of process safety culture by hybrid hidden content analysis and fuzzy DEMA℡. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1470. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52067-7
18.
GoelS.SharmaR.RathoreA. K. (2021). A review on barrier and challenges of electric vehicle in India and vehicle to grid optimisation. Transport Engineer, 4, 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2021.100057
19.
GrecuI.NechitaR. M.StochioiuF. P. G.UlerichO.DumitrescuC. I.CristoiuC. (2025). A decision-oriented framework for sustainable supply chain redesign: A DEMATEL-Based approach. Logistics, 9(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030090
20.
GulzarY.DuttaM.GuptaD.JunejaS.SoomroA. B.MirM. S. (2024). Revolutionizing mobility: A comprehensive review of electric vehicles charging stations in India. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 6, 1346731. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1346731
21.
GuptaS.KhannaR.KohliP.AgnihotriS.SoniU.AsjadM. (2023). Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure using fuzzy AHP – A case study in India. Operations Management Research, 16(1), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00290-8
22.
HaldankarG. B.BhatS.ShirodkarK. K.SubramanyamA. (2024). Electric vehicle revolution in India: A comprehensive and comparative study of Ev business in India. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15396
23.
Hezam Al-MishnanahI.MishraA.RaniP.CavallaroF.SahaA.AliJ.StrielkowskiW.ŠtreimikienėD. (2022). A hybrid intuitionistic Fuzzy-MEREC-RS-DNMA method for assessing the alternative fuel vehicles with sustainability perspectives. Sustainability, 14(9), 5463. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095463
24.
HoncharovO. (2025). China’s government programs supporting electric vehicle production: Impact on sector development and global trends in sustainable transportation. Green, Blue and Digital Economy Journal, 6(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5169/2025-1-4
25.
IbrahimF. B.JantanA. H. B. (2024). CHALLENGES, barriers, and solutions in public-private partnerships (PPP): A comprehensive review. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(10), e04830. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i10.4830
26.
IreshikaMASTKepplingerP. (2024). Uncertainties in model predictive control for decentralized autonomous demand side management of electric vehicles. Journal of Energy Storage, 83, 110194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.110194
27.
JainM.TalwarS.RastogiR.KaurP.DhirA. (2024). Policy stimulation for the electric vehicle industry: An analysis of mainstream media discourse. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5303–5324. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3750
28.
JhaA. C.KumarD.JhaM. (2024) Overcoming barriers: Understanding and addressing impediments to electric vehicle adoption in India. In: 2024 2nd international conference on advancements and key challenges in green energy and computing (AKGEC), November 2024, pp. 1–6. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10868956 (accessed 7 April 2025).
29.
KlaassenE. A. M.van der LaanM.de HeerH. P. J.van HeesbeenJ.HubbersN. (2020). Case study: Practical deployment of electric vehicle flexibility. USEF.
30.
KouG.EtiS.YükselS.DinçerH.ErgünE.GökalpY. (2024). Innovative solution suggestions for financing electric vehicle charging infrastructure investments with a novel artificial intelligence-based fuzzy decision-making modelling. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11012-w
31.
KrishnamurthyR.MuralidharanR.RajendranP. M. (2022). Sustainability as a business purpose: A case of electric vehicles. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 6(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv6i2p2
32.
LauY.Andrew WuY.Wing YanM. (2022). Electric vehicle charging infrastructures in the greater Bay area of China: Progress, challenges and efforts. Frontiers in Future Transportation, 3, 893583. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffutr.2022.893583
33.
LauronH. J.AbellanaD. P. M. (2024). An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for determining the interdependencies among the african swine fever spread factors. Decision Analytics Journal, 11, 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100454
34.
LiuJ.WeiQ. (2018). Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure public-private partnership projects in China using fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.103
35.
MahadikS.GedamM.ShahD. (2025). Environment sustainability with smart grid sensor. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1510410. Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1510410
36.
MajidM. A.JC. R. K.AhmedA. (2024). Advances in electric vehicles for a self-reliant energy ecosystem and powering a sustainable future in India. E-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy, 10, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2024.100753
37.
ManikandanB.GudipalliA. (2022). A review on electrical vehicle adaptation in India. International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, 15(1), 20220013. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijssis-2022-0013
38.
MelchorG.CámaraM.JiménezE.MartínezE. (2010). A new energetics scenario with renewable energy. Renewable Energy & Power Quality Journal, 1(8), 1374–1379. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj08.670
39.
MishraS.VermaS.ChowdhuryS.GaurA.MohapatraS.DwivediG.VermaP. (2021). A comprehensive review on developments in electric vehicle charging station infrastructure and present scenario of India. Sustainability, 13(4), 2396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042396
40.
MohantyP. K.ReddyK. H. K.PanigrahyS. K.Sinha RoyD. (2024). Leveraging generative and explainable AI for electric vehicle energy toward sustainable, consumer-centric transportation. IEEE Access, 12, 143721–143732. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3405959
41.
NeelamK. K. (2021). Policy initiation for development of slow charging station infrastructure and E-rickshaw vehicle registration process in India. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(5), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejenergy.2021.1.5.28
42.
Oginga MartinsJ. (2025). Electric mobility initiatives in Kisumu: enablers, progress, barriers and impacts in a secondary African city. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-025-00106-0
43.
Ortiz-BarriosM.Alfaro-SaizJ-J. (2020). A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate the overall performance of public emergency departments: A case study. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 19(06), 1485–1548. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622020500364
44.
PathakN.AwasthiA.KumarA. (2024). Innovating for a sustainable future: Exploring business opportunities in India’s electric vehicle sector. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on the role of innovation, entrepreneurship and management for sustainable development (ICRIEMSD 2024), 17-18 October, Raigarh, India. pp. 268–293.
QiuY.ChenH. (2023). A systematic review of the knowledge domain of institutional theory in construction project management. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 30(6), 2523–2544. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-08-2021-0754
47.
RajendranG.VaithilingamC. A.NaiduK.OrugantiK. S. P. (2020). Energy-efficient converters for electric vehicle charging stations. Discover Applied Sciences, 2(4), 583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2369-0
48.
RamachandranS.SaravananS.JuliusFusic S.RajagopalanA. (2025). Exploring misconceptions and challenges of electric vehicle adoption in India. IEEE Access, 13, 37632–37648. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3545749
49.
SachanS.SinghP. P. (2022). Charging infrastructure planning for electric vehicle in India: Present status and future challenges. Regional Sustainability, 3(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2022.11.008
50.
SaklaniM.SainiD. K.YadavM.GuptaY. C. (2024). Navigating the challenges of EV integration and demand-side management for India’s sustainable EV growth. IEEE Access, 12, 143767–143796. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3470218
51.
SamawiG. A.BwaliezO. M.JreissatM.KandasA. (2025). Advancing sustainable development in Jordan: A business and economic analysis of electric vehicle adoption in the transportation sector. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16010045
52.
SangkhamS.PhairuangW.SherchanS. P.PansakunN.MunkongN.SarndhongK.IslamM. A.SakunkooP. (2024). An update on adverse health effects from exposure to PM2.5. Environmental Advances, 18, 100603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100603
53.
SarkarD.BhattN. (2023). Development and techno-economic analysis of hybrid annuity model for highway projects of India. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 7(1-2), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636231201106
54.
SekerS.ZavadskasE. K. (2017). Application of fuzzy DEMATEL method for analyzing occupational risks on construction sites. Sustainability, 9(11), 11. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. 2083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112083
55.
ShahM. A.GaneshU. B. (2025). Delays to distributed ledgers: Examining the rationale for leveraging blockchain technology in construction sector. In Global knowledge, memory and communication ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). Emerald Publishing Limited.
56.
ShahM. A.KumarS.ShahM. A.RasoolA. (2024). Examining the relationship among critical success factors (CSFs) for delivery of sustainable public-private partnership projects. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 29(2), 250–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-12-2022-0064
57.
ShamsuddohaM.NasirT. (2025). The road ahead for electric vehicles (EVs) in developing countries: Market growth. Infrastructure, and Policy Needs. Available at: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202501.2083/v1 (accessed 7 April 2025).
58.
ShanmugamY.RajamanickamN.BernatP.MoldrikP. (2024). PV integrated multi-leg powered constant quasi-dynamic charging system for low-speed vehicles. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 19128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70105-2
59.
ShengM.SreenivasanA. V.SharpB.WilsonD.RanjitkarP. (2020). Economic analysis of dynamic inductive power transfer roadway charging system under public-private partnership–evidence from New Zealand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119958
60.
SinghK.ChanniH. (2022). India’s progress on environmental sustainable development goals: A review. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 43(1), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v43i1.3227
61.
SkeeteJ-P.WellsP.DongX.HeidrichO.HarperG. (2020). Beyond the EVent horizon: Battery waste, recycling, and sustainability in the United Kingdom electric vehicle transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101581
62.
TahirJ.AtkinsonM.TianZ.KassemM.AhmadR.MartinezP. (2024). A critical analysis of public private partnership model in energy from waste projects. Sustainable Futures, 8, 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100240
TillyN.YigitcanlarT.DegirmenciK.PazA. (2024). How sustainable is electric vehicle adoption? Insights from a PRISMA review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 117, 105950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105950
65.
UdendhranR.MohanT. R.BabuR.UthraR. A.GA. C.SelvakumarasamyS.DineshG.MukhopadhyayM.SaraswatV.ChakrabortyP. (2025). Transitioning to sustainable E-vehicle systems – Global perspectives on the challenges, policies, and opportunities. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 17, 100619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100619
66.
van SambeekH. L.ZweistraM.HoogsteenG.VarenhorstI. A. M.JanssenS. (2023). GridShield—Optimizing the use of grid capacity during increased EV adoption. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 14(3), 3. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14030068
67.
WHOW. H. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide: Executive summary. World Health Organization. Available at: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/345334 (accessed 19 April 2025).
68.
YamamotoH.JavedK. (2023). Strategic partnerships and collaborations for innovation: Unlocking synergies in the age of disruption. Abbottabad University Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 1(02), 85–93.
ZhangL.ZhaoZ.ChaiJ.KanZ. (2019). Risk identification and analysis for PPP projects of electric vehicle charging infrastructure based on 2-Tuple and the DEMATEL model. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 10(1), 1. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj10010004
71.
ZhaoT.ZhangJ.WangP. (2019). Closed-loop supply chain based battery swapping and charging system operation: A hierarchy game approach. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 5(1), 35–45.
