Situated in a context of rapid technological innovation, coupled with federal and state efforts to foster sustainability, the continued growth of electric vehicle adoption presents new challenges concerning the capacity of existing transportation infrastructure. This study explores the diffusion, adoption, and prospects for adoption of a new technology: battery electric vehicles within local government fleets. Coupling archival data of municipal characteristics with an original survey of local government officials, this study examines which social, economic, and technological factors shape governmental pursuit of this technology within one culturally dynamic state. A supply-side, top-down framework for installing supportive infrastructure takes a central place in our consideration as the outcomes of that process have led to implementation of key charging stations with geographic significance. Results of our analysis reveal broad interest, though with expressed hesitance, in electrifying municipal vehicle fleets. While the policy diffusion literature places a premium on geographic proximity, municipalities reflecting the strongest prospects for fleet electrification are located within areas with greater public support, investment in capital infrastructure, and higher electric vehicle adoption rates.
AhnM. J.ChenY. C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), Article 101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664
2.
AshworthR.BoyneG.DelbridgeR. (2009). Escape from the iron Cage? Organizational change and isomorphic pressures in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum038
3.
BerryF. S.BerryW. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526
4.
BerryF. S.BerryW. D. (2018). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In: WeibleC. M.SabatierP. A. (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 253–297). Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284
5.
BerryW. D.BaybeckB. (2005). Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051841
6.
BowmanA. O.KearneyR. (1986). The resurgence of the states: Prentice Hall.
7.
ChengS.AliS. (2023). A tiered pathway toward sustainability: The role of public administrators in advancing social equity in U.S. local governments. Public Administration Review, 83(4), 878–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13617
8.
CopeG. H.DaviesV. W. (1991). Diffusion of innovations in state and local governments. American Society for Public Administration Annual Conference. [Unpublished manuscript presentation].
9.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
10.
DegirmenciK.BreitnerM. (2017). Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.001
11.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and the collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
12.
DistorC.KhaltarO.MoonM. J. (2021). Adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in local governments: An exploratory study on the attitudes and perceptions of officials in a municipal government in the Philippines. Journal of Public Affairs and Development, 8(1), 33–65.
13.
ExmeyerP. C.HallJ. L. (2022). High time for a higher-level look at high-technology: Plotting a course for managing government information in an age of governance. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13513
14.
FayD. L.PolischukL. (2022). Diffusion of complex governance arrangements: State approaches to addressing intimate partner violence. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13453
15.
FeiockR. C.WestJ. P. (1993). Testing competing explanations for policy adoption: Municipal solid waste recycling programs. Political Research Quarterly, 46(2), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600211
16.
GilbertD.BalestriniP.LittleboyD. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410539794
17.
HallJ. L. (2008a). The forgotten regional organizations: Creating capacity for economic development. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00841.x
18.
HallJ. L. (2008b). Assessing local capacity for federal grant-getting. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074007311385
19.
HallJ. L.HandleyD. M. (2011). City adoption of federal performance measurement requirements: Perspectives from community development block grant program administrators. Public Performance and Management Review, 34(4), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576340401
20.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. H. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424
21.
HawleyA. (1968). Human ecology. In: SillsD. L. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 328–337): University of Chicago Press.
22.
HolmenA. K. T.RingholmT. (2023). When innovative ideas encounter institutions: An analytical model. Public Performance and Management Review, 46(5), 1027–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2224305
23.
HoweP.MildenbergerM.MarlonJ.LeiserowitzA. (2015). Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2583
JensenJ. L. (2003). Policy diffusion through institutional legitimation: State lotteries. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug033
28.
JunK. N.WeareC. (2011). Institutional motivations in the adoption of innovations: The case of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq020
KnopmanD.WachsM.MillerB.DavisS.PfrommerK. (2018). Renewing America’s infrastructure: An agenda for federal transportation and water policy. Public Works Management & Policy, 23(4), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X18789703
32.
LaRoseR.StroverS.GreggJ. L.StraubhaarJ. (2011). The impact of rural broadband development: Lessons from a natural field experiment. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.013
33.
LeeC.ChangK.BerryF. S. (2011). Testing the development and diffusion of e-government and e-democracy: A global perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x
34.
LundinM.ÖbergP.JosefssonC. (2015). Learning from success: Are successful governments role models?Public Administration, 93(3), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12162
35.
MelitskiJ. (2003). Capacity and e-government performance: An analysis based on early adopters of internet technologies in New Jersey. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1530957603026004005
36.
MoonM. J. (2002). The evolution of e‐government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
37.
MoonM. J.NorrisD. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
38.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1978). The external control of organizations. Harper & Row.
39.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). Free Press.
40.
ScottR. W. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(#), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392880
41.
ScottR. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications.
SimmonsB.DobbinF.GarrettG. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060267
45.
SongM. R.ChuW.ImM. (2022). The effect of cultural and psychological characteristics on the purchase behavior and satisfaction of electric vehicles: A comparative study of US and China. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(1), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12684
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2023) Charging forward: A toolkit for planning and funding rural electric mobility infrastructure (2). Retrieved from. https://www.transportation.gov/rural/ev/toolkit
VoldenC. (2006). States as policy laboratories: Emulating success in the children’s health insurance program. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00185.x
52.
WalkerJ. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954434
53.
WangS.FeeneyM. K. (2016). Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 292–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014553462
54.
WelchS.ThompsonK. (1980). The impact of federal incentives on state policy innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 715–729. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110955
55.
WhitacreB.GallardoR.StroverS. (2014). Broadband’s contribution to economic growth in rural areas: Moving towards a causal relationship. Telecommunications Policy, 38(11), 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.05.005
56.
WhitacreB.StroverS.GallardoR. (2015). How much does broadband infrastructure matter? Decomposing the metro-non-metro adoption gap with the help of the national broadband map. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.002
57.
WiemanC. (1998). The high-tech transition: Technology and the prospects for improving infrastructure performance. Journal of Urban Technology, 5(2), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630739883895
58.
YangK.MelitskiJ. (2007). Competing and complementary values in information technology strategic planning: Observations from ten states. Public Performance and Management Review, 30(3), 426–452. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300306
59.
YiH.BerryF. S.ChenW. (2018). Management innovation and policy diffusion through leadership transfer networks: An agent network diffusion model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy031
60.
ZhengY.Lauer-SchachterH. (2018). The impact of administrator willingness on website e-participation. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400988
