Given the importance of social infrastructure for social and economic development, government expenditures on parks and recreation, education, and public housing are examined. Drawing from punctuated equilibrium, social vulnerability, and subsidiarity principles for theoretical context, the present study investigates the factors contributing to state social infrastructure spending. Using balanced panel data on 49 U.S. states over 20 time periods and random effects regressions with year dummies, findings show that the determinants of social infrastructure are more nuanced and depend on the type of social infrastructure. Disasters affect park and recreation spending, while federal subsidiarity assistance to states benefit educational infrastructure. Also, sales tax revenue increases spending for parks and recreation, and a youthful population increases educational spending. The study shows that integrating multiple theoretical perspectives to examine broad policy areas offers a deeper understanding of multiple social infrastructure policy areas regarding how states prioritize these issues and offer recommendations.
AbercrombieL. C.SallisJ. F.ConwayT. L.FrankL. D.SaelensB. E.ChapmanJ. E. (2008). Income and racial disparities in access to public parks and private recreation facilities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.030
2.
AblahE.KondaK.KelleyC. L. (2009). Factors predicting individual emergency preparedness: A multi-state analysis of 2006 BRFSS data. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 7(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2009.0022
AhmaduA. S.NukpezahJ. A. (2022). Disasters, jurisdictional vulnerability, and local tax revenues. Public Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.46.2.3
5.
AhmaduA. S.NukpezahJ. A.FrenchP. E.MenifieldC. E. (2024). Disasters and social vulnerability determinants of federal subsidiarity assistance. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13671
6.
AkinlekeW. O. (2012). The effects of background characteristics and school factors on college students’ performance and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(8), 251–257.
ArterberryL. M.NukpezahJ. A. (2024). Resiliency in the Jackson water crisis: Investigating the roles of social vulnerability and US federal subsidiarity assistance. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 16(1), Article e12295. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12295
BartonJ.PrettyJ. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(10), 3947–3955. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903183r
11.
BenavidesA. D.NukpezahJ. A. (2020). How local governments are caring for the homeless during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 650–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020942062
12.
BesleyT.PerssonT.SturmD. M. (2010). Political competition, policy and growth: Theory and evidence from the US. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1329–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2010.00606.x
BrennanP. M. (2014). Subsidiarity in the tradition of Catholic social doctrine. Global perspectives on subsidiarity, 29–47.
16.
BurdmanP. (2005). The student debt dilemma: Debt aversion as a barrier to college access. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE. 13.05. Center for Studies in Higher Education. https://escholarship.org/content/qt6sp9787j/qt6sp9787j.pdf.
17.
CarrollD. A. (2009). Diversifying municipal government revenue structures: Fiscal illusion or instability?Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2009.00922.x
ChengY.YangL. (2019). Providing public services without relying heavily on government funding: How do nonprofits respond to government budget cuts?The American Review of Public Administration of Public Administration, 49(6), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018806085
20.
ChoiS. O.BaeS. S.KwonS. W.FeiockR. (2010). County limits: Policy types and expenditure priorities. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008328171
ConlanT. (2006). From cooperative to opportunistic federalism: Reflections on the half-century anniversary of the commission on intergovernmental relations. Public Administration Review, 66(5), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00631.x
23.
CorakM. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.79
24.
CrainW. M.OakleyL. K. (1995). The politics of infrastructure. The Journal of Law and Economics, 38(1), 1–17.
25.
CutterS. L.BoruffB. J.ShirleyW. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
26.
CutterS. L.FinchC. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(7), 2301–2306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710375105
27.
DavlasheridzeM.MiaoQ. (2021). Natural disasters, public housing, and the role of disaster aid. Journal of Regional Science, 61(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12534
28.
DowallD. E. (2001). Rethinking statewide infrastructure policies: Lessons from California and beyond. Public Works Management & Policy, 6(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x0161002
FisherR. C.WassmerR. W. (2015). An analysis of state–local government capital expenditure during the 2000s. Public Budgeting & Finance, 35(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12062
FlinkC.WalterR. J.XuX. (2021). Policy diffusion in a redistributive policy: Affordable housing and state housing trust funds. State and Local Government Review, 53(3), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x211049420
33.
GazleyB.LaFontantC.ChengY. (2020). Does coproduction of public services support government’s social equity goals? The case of US state parks. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13161
34.
HelpapD. J. (2023). Assessing and addressing the challenges of rural local governments. State and Local Government Review, 55(4), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x231200830
35.
HoA. T. (2008). State highway capital expenditure and the economic cycle. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701410885
36.
JacksonC. K.JohnsonR. C.PersicoC. (2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms (No. w20847). National Bureau of Economic Research.
37.
JacobyW. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 750–767. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669279
38.
JonesB. D.BaumgartnerF. R. (2012). From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x
39.
LeavittW. M.KieferJ. J. (2006). Infrastructure interdependency and the creation of a normal disaster: The case of hurricane Katrina and the city of new Orleans. Public Works Management & Policy, 10(4), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x06289055
40.
Leon-MoretaA.TotaroV. R.DixonD. S. (2020). Social heterogeneity, local capacity, and urban parks: Evidence from US cities. Cities, 99, Article 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102588
41.
LightbourneJ. E.SillahA.NukpezahJ. A. (2023). Gentrification and nonprofit activities for neighborhood development in Baltimore, Maryland and Houston, Texas. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 30(1), Article 4.
42.
LindblomC. E. (1989). The science of muddling through. Readings in Managerial Psychology, 4, 117–131.
43.
ModaffariJ.AlleyneA. (2022). Federal investments in K-12 infrastructure would benefit students across the Country. Center for American Progress. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED625941.pdf
44.
MorettiE. (2004). Estimating the social return to higher education: Evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1-2), 175–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.015
45.
MuellerJ. T.ParkS. Y.MowenA. J. (2019). The relationship between parks and recreation per capita spending and mortality from 1980 to 2010: A fixed effects model. Preventive Medicine Reports, 14, Article 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100827
46.
NollenbergerK.MaherC.BeachP.Kevin McGeeM. (2012). Budget priorities and community perceptions of service quality and importance. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 24(2), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-24-02-2012-b004
47.
NukpezahJ. A. (2020). Social vulnerability determinants of individual social capital for emergency preparedness. International Journal of Emergency Management, 16(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijem.2020.110107
48.
NukpezahJ. A. (2021). Punctuated equilibrium theory and enhancement of local government investment pool innovation. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 7(2), 217–235.
49.
NukpezahJ. A.AhmaduA. S. (2024). Determinants of state infrastructure spending: Testing punctuated equilibrium and social vulnerability theories. The American Review of Public Administration, 54(5), 486–501.
50.
NukpezahJ. A.SoujaaI. (2018). Creating emergency prepared households-what really are the determinants of household emergency preparedness?Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 9(4), 480–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12142
51.
PaganoM. A.PerryD. (2008). Financing infrastructure in the 21st century city. Public Works Management & Policy, 13(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x08321015
52.
PhinneyR.DanzigerS.PollackH. A.SeefeldtK. (2007). Housing instability among current and former welfare recipients. American Journal of Public Health, 97(5), 832–837. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.082677
PooleyK. B. (2014). Using Community Development Block Grant dollars to revitalize neighborhoods: The impact of program spending in Philadelphia. Housing Policy Debate, 24(1), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2013.851100
55.
PowersS. L.PitasN. A. D.MowenA. J. (2022). Public perceptions of local parks and recreation as an essential community service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 40(3), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2022-11223
56.
ReichR.KoskiW. (2006). The state’s obligation to provide education: Adequate education or equal education?Rethinking Rodriguez: Education as a Fundamental Right.
57.
RigolonA.NémethJ. (2021). What shapes uneven access to urban amenities? Thick injustice and the legacy of racial discrimination in Denver’s parks. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(3), 312–325.
58.
RobinsonS. E.BerrettB.StoneK. (2006). The development of collaboration of response to hurricane Katrina in the Dallas area. Public Works Management & Policy, 10(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x06289053
59.
RosenheckR.BassukE.SalomonA. (1999). Special populations of homeless Americans. The 1998 National Symposium on Homelessness Research. In U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (pp. 1–27). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
SunR.JungC. (2012). Does user-charge financing reduce expenditure levels for the charge- financed services?The American Review of Public Administration, 42(2), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011399753
62.
The White House. (2021). Updated fact sheet: Bipartisan infrastructure investment and jobs act.
63.
TilcsikA.MarquisC. (2013). Punctuated generosity: How mega-events and natural disasters affect corporate philanthropy in US communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213475800
64.
TotaroV. R. (2018). Local government spending on public housing: Factors of influence in metropolitan areas.
65.
UlineC.Tschannen-MoranM. (2008). The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810849817
VojnovicI.Jackson-ElmooreC.HoltropJ.BruchS. (2006). The renewed interest in urban form and public health: Promoting increased physical activity in Michigan. Cities, 23(1), 1–17.
69.
WangJ. (2024). Impact of natural disasters on student enrollment in higher education programs: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(6), Article e27705.
70.
WelchR. K.CarruthersJ. I.WaldorfB. S. (2007). Public service expenditures as compensating differentials in US metropolitan areas: Housing values and rents (pp. 131–156). Cityscape.
71.
WisnerB.GaillardJ. C.KelmanI. (2012). Handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge.
72.
WolchJ. R.ByrneJ.NewellJ. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
73.
YerenaA. (2015). The impact of advocacy organizations on low-income housing policy in US cities. Urban Affairs Review, 51(6), 843–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415571451
