Despite a call for collaboration, there remain challenges to engaging the public health community in the regional transportation planning process. Using an integrated framework of network theory and collaborative planning, we explore collaboration barriers and opportunities between transportation and public health communities. Analysis of primary data collected from a focus group and secondary data from 43 national case studies suggests that major perceived barriers include a lack of formal and informal mechanisms and knowledge management practices that facilitate collaboration. Coordination of policies at multiple levels, leadership, trust, and data sharing are recognized as important tools for collaboration. Implications are discussed.
AustinJ. E. (2000). The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BlumenbergE. (2002). Planning for the transportation needs of welfare participants: Institutional challenges to collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 152-163.
5.
BooherD.InnesJ. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 221-236.
6.
BravemanP.GottliebL. (2014). The social determinants of health: It’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Reports, 129(Suppl. 2), 19-31.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Chronic disease prevention and health promotion. Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/overview/
CohenJ. M.BonifaceS.WatkinsS. (2014). Health implications of transport planning, development and operations. Journal of Transport & Health, 1, 63-72. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2013.12.004
12.
CorburnJ. (2004). Confronting the challenges in reconnecting Urban planning. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 541-546.
13.
CorburnJ. (2009). Toward the healthy city. Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press.
14.
CorburnJ.BhatiaR. (2007). Health impact assessment in San Francisco: Incorporating the social determinants of health into environmental planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 323-341.
15.
DempwolfS. C.LylesW. L. (2012). The uses of social network analysis in planning: A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 27, 3-21.
16.
FrankL.EngelkeP.SchmidT. (2003). Health and community design: The impact of the built environment on physical activity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17.
FrankL.SallisJ.ConwayT.ChapmanJ.SaelensB.BachmanW. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 75-87.
18.
FrumkinH.FrankL.JacksonR. (2004). Urban sprawl and public health: Designing, planning, and building for healthy communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19.
GoldsteinB. E.ButlerW. H. (2010). Expanding the scope and impact of collaborative planning: Combining multi-stakeholder collaboration and communities of practice in a learning network. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 238-249.
20.
GrayB. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38, 911-936.
21.
GrayB. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Health and Wellness Coalition. (2010). Health and Wellness Coalition of Wichita, KA. Available from http://www.hwcwichita.org
23.
HynesH.LopezR. (2009). Urban health: Readings in the social, built, and physical environments of U.S. cities. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
24.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 412-423.
25.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London, England: Routledge.
26.
MargerumR. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
RoofK.GlandonR. (2008). Tool created to assess health impacts of development decisions in Ingham County Michigan. Journal of Environmental Health, 71(1), 35-38.
29.
RoofK.MaclennanC. (2008). Tri-County health department in Colorado does more than just review a development plan. Journal of Environmental Health, 71(1), 31-34.
30.
RoofK.SutherlandS. (2008). Smart growth and health for the future: “Our course of action,” Delaware County, Ohio. Journal of Environmental Health, 71(1), 28-30.
31.
San Francisco Department of Public Health. (2010). Program on Health, Equity and Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.sfhealthequity.org/
ScholzJ.BerardoR.KileB. (2008). Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search, and collaboration. The Journal of Politics, 70, 393-406.
WierM.SciammasC.SetoE.BhatiaR.RivardT. (2009). Health, traffic, and environmental justice: Collaborative research and community action in San Francisco, California. American Journal of Public Health, 99(Suppl. 3), S499-S504.
