During a period of high gasoline prices and in the absence of alternative means of transportation, commuters in rural areas in the United States are incurring higher transportation costs than their urban counterparts. Due to an inadequate investigation of rural commuters’ preferences, this exploratory research is an attempt to understand whether individuals would be willing to use public transit if it were to be provided and what the factors are that influence their decision. Analysis of survey data suggests commuters’ preference for public transit service in a rural transit district, and its sustenance requires a focus on those service attributes that individuals value most.
BlumenbergE.OngP. (2001). Cars, buses, and jobs: Welfare participants and employment access in Los Angeles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1756, 22-31.
2.
BosI.Van der HeijdenM. E.TimmermansH. (2004). The choice of park and ride facilities: An analysis using context-dependent hierarchical choice experiment. Journal of Environment and Planning A, 36(9), 1673-1686.
3.
BrownD. M. (2008). Public transportation on the move in rural America. Washington, DC: Economic research service, U.S. Department of agriculture. Retrieved August 9, 2011, from http://www.nal.usda.gov/ric/ricpubs/publictrans.htm
CasselloJ. M.HellingaB. (2008). Impacts of express bus service on passenger demand. Journal of Public Transportation, 11(4), 1-23.
6.
DiazO.PalomaG.JametC.CaiafaM.CamaraP.BoeckiT. (2000). Social exclusion and public transport: Aspects of accessibility and mobility in bus systems environment, urban transportation and environment. In Proceedings of the International Conference CODATU IX, Mexico City (pp. 695-700). Mexico City, Mexico.
7.
EltonyM. (1993). Transport gasoline demand in Canada. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 27, 193-208.
8.
EspeyM. (1996). Watching the fuel gauge: An international model of automobile fuel economy. Energy Economics, 18, 93-106.
FujiiS.GarlingT.KitamuraR. (2001). Changes in drivers’ perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure: Effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real life social dilemma. Environment and Behavior, 33(6), 796-808.
12.
GarrettM.TaylorB. (1999). Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Berkeley Planning Journal, 13, 6-27.
13.
GaterslebenB.UzzellD. (2007). Affective appraisals of the daily commute. Environment and Behavior, 20(3), 416-431.
14.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2010). SPSS for Windows: Step by step. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
GruidlJ. J.MerrettC. D.ConnellyD. (2007). You can’t get there from here: Issues in rural passenger transportation in PlantJ. F.JohnstonV. R.CiocirlanC. E. (Eds.), Handbook of transportation policy and administration (pp. 239-252). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
HecoxD. (2009). America’s decline in driving begins second year (Federal Highway Administration Press Release). Retrieved August 9, 2011, from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pressroom/fhwa0905.htm
19.
HensherD. (2007). Sustainable public transport systems: Moving towards a value for money and network based approach and away from blind commitment. Transport Policy, 14, 98-102.
20.
HineJ.MitchellF. (2001). Better for everyone? Travel experiences and transport exclusion. Urban Studies, 38, 319-322.
21.
HossainM.KennedyS. (2006). Estimating potential energy savings with efficient public transport alternatives under various traffic scenarios: A spread sheet based tool for Kuala Lumpur. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: DANIDA—Economic Planning Unit of Malaysian Government.
22.
JoiremanJ.Van LangeP.Van VugtM. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36(2), 187-200.
23.
KachiganS. K. (1991). Multivariate statistical analysis: A conceptual introduction. New York, NY: Radius Press.
24.
LachapelleU.FrankL. (2009). Transit and health: Mode of transport, employer sponsored public transit pass programs and physical activity. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, 73-94.
25.
Levinson HerbertS. (2001). Bus transit in the 21st century - perspectives and prospects. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1760, 42-46.
26.
LitmanT. (2003). Integrating public health objectives in transportation decision making. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 103-108.
27.
McLaffertyS.PrestonV. (1996). Spatial mismatch and employment in a decade of restructuring. The Professional Geographer, 48, 420-431.
28.
NorN.NorA.AbdullahA. (2006). Predicting the impact of demand- and supply-side measures on bus ridership in Putrajaya, Malaysia. Journal of Public Transportation, 9(5), 57-70.
29.
NutleyS. (2005). Monitoring rural travel behaviour: A longitudinal study in Northern Ireland 1979-2001. Journal of Urban Transport Geography, 13, 247-263.
30.
O’SullivanA. (2007). Urban economics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
31.
O’SullivanE.RasselG. R.BernerM. (2007). Research methods for public administrators (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
32.
PucherJ.RenneJ. L. (2005). Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Transportation, 32(2), 165-186.
33.
RosenbloomS. (2003). Facing societal challenges: The need for new paradigms in rural transit services. Journal of Public Transportation, 6(1), 1-17.
ShahriarA.KhanA. (2003). Optimization of travel in bus rapid transit based multimodal corridor. Journal of Public Transportation, 6(2), 87-106.
36.
SultanaS. (2002). Jobs-housing imbalance and commuting in the Atlanta metropolitan area: Exploration of causes of longer commuting. Urban Geography, 23(8), 728-749.
Van LangeP.Van VugtM.MeertensR.RuiterR. (1998). A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: The roles of social value orientation and trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 796-820.
39.
Van VugtM.Van LangeP.MeertensR. (1996). Commuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 373-395.
