The average U.S. male historically commutes further and longer than his female counterpart. Yet pivotal changes at home, as younger women especially increase their influence on household location and work decisions, and in the labor market, and as women's participation rates and profiles approach men's, strongly suggest that gender's influence on travel might be changing as well. Furthermore, the independent and interactive influence of other demographic factors, not least age and race, remain unclear. This study analyzes national microdata covering the past 20 years to examine both issues. We find sources of both convergence and divergence in travel behaviors by sex. The gender gap in commute length of older workers is growing, even while that of younger workers steadily closes. At the same time, racial differences in mode choice and commute times are becoming less pronounced—both by race and by gender. Thus, gendered elements of travel demand are indeed evolving, if not in predictable directions.
Altonji, J., & Blank, R. (2005). Race and gender in the labor market. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 3143-3259). Amsterdam: Elsevier .
2.
Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493-517.
3.
Becker, G. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, 533-558.
4.
Blau, F. (2001). Economics of gender. In P. Baltes & N. Smelser (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 5995-6002). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5.
Cervero, R. (1996). Jobs-housing balance revisited: Trends and impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 492-511.
6.
Chapple, K. (2001). Time to work: Job search strategies and commute time for women on welfare in San Francisco. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, 155-173.
7.
Cobb, R., & Coughlin, J. (2000). How will we get there from here? Placing transportation on the aging policy agenda. Journal of Aging and Social Policy , 11, 201-210.
8.
Crane, R. (1996). The influence of uncertain job location on urban form and the journey to work. Journal of Urban Economics, 37, 342-356.
9.
Crane, R. (2007). Is there a quiet revolution in women's travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73, 298-316.
10.
Crane, R., & Chatman, D. (2003). Traffic and sprawl: Evidence from U.S. commuting, 1985 to 1997. Planning and Markets, 6, 14-22.
11.
Doyle, D.G., & Taylor, B.D. (2000). Variation in metropolitan travel behavior by sex and ethnicity. In Travel patterns of people of color: Final report (pp. 181-244). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
12.
Giuliano, G. (1979). Public transportation and the travel needs of women. Traffic Quarterly, 33, 607-616.
13.
Giuliano, G., & Small, K. (1993). Is the journey to work explained by urban structure ? Urban Studies, 30, 1485-1500.
14.
Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women's employment, education, and family. American Economic Review , 96, 1-21.
15.
Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (1991). Job search and the occupational segregation of women. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 229-253.
16.
Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (1995). Gender, work, and space. New York: Routledge.
17.
Ihlanfeldt, K., & Sjoquist, D. (1998). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 849-892.
18.
Kain, J. (1968). Housing segregation, Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 175-197.
19.
Law, R. (1999). Beyond "women and transport": Towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography , 23, 567-588.
20.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
MacDonald, H. (1999). Women's employment and commuting: Explaining the links. Journal of Planning Literature, 13, 267-283.
22.
Madden, J., & White, M. (1978). Women's work trips: An empirical and theoretical overview. In S. Rosenbloom (Ed.), Women's travel issues: Research needs and priorities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. (pp. 201-242).
23.
McLafferty, S., & Preston, V. (1997). Gender, race, and determinants of commuting: New York in 1990. Urban Geography, 18, 192-212.
24.
Mincer, J. (1962). Labor force participation of married women: A study of labor supply. In H. G. Lewis (Ed.), Aspects of labor economics (pp. 63-97). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Ong, P., & Blumenberg, E. (1998). Job access, commute and travel burden among welfare recipients. Urban Studies, 35, 77-93.
26.
Rosenbloom, S., & Burns, E. (1993). Gender differences in commuter travel in Tucson: Implications for travel demand management programs. Transportation Research Record, 1404, 82-90.
27.
Rosenbloom, S. (2004). The mobility of the elderly: There's good news and bad news. In Transportation in an aging society (Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings No. 27, pp. 3-21). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
28.
Rosenbloom, S. (2006). Understanding women and men's travel patterns: The research challenge. In Research on women's issues in transportation: Vol. 1. Conference overview and plenary papers (Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings No. 35, pp. 7-28). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
29.
Stoll, M. (2006). Job sprawl, spatial mismatch and black employment disadvantage. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 827-854.
30.
Wachs, M. (1979). Transportation for the elderly: Changing life-styles, changing needs. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Wachs, M. (1987). Men, women, and wheels: The historical basis of sex differences in travel patterns. Transportation Research Record, 1135, 10-16.
32.
Wachs, M. (1991). Men, women, and urban travel: The persistence of separate spheres. In M. Wachs & M. Crawford (Eds.), The car and the city: The automobile, the built environment, and daily urban life . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press (pp. 86-100).
