This article examines the effect of lateral location on the degradation of retroreflectivity in thermoplastic pavement-marking systems. The authors examined data collected on North Carolina roads over a 5-year period and conducted a statistical analysis to determine if there was a significant difference in the rates of retroreflectivity degradation between edge lines and center lines. The study concluded that there was statistical evidence that lateral line location does have an effect on retroreflectivity degradation and that center lines degrade faster than edge lines. Understanding retroreflectivity performance over time facilitates the development and implementation of guidelines and tools that can be used for holistic asset management. Based on their findings, the authors recommend changes in pavement-marking maintenance strategies.
Al-Masaeid, H.R. , & Sinha, K.C. (1994). Analysis of accident reduction potential of pavement markings . Journal of Transportation Engineering, 120(5), 723-736 .
2.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
3.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM). ( 2005a). Standard practice for describing retroreflection (ASTM E 808). West Conshohoken, PA: Author .
4.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM). ( 2005b). Standard test method for measurement of retroreflective pavement marking materials with CEN-prescribed geometry using a portable retroreflectometer (ASTM E 1710-05). West Conshohoken, PA: Author .
5.
Baker, J.A. , & Lambert, J.H. (2001). Information system for risks, costs, and benefits of infrastructure improvement projects. Public Works Management andPolicy, 5(3), 198-208 .
McDiarmid, M. (2001, March 8). Mobile pavement marking retroreflectometer data collection for TIP Project R-4067 (Memorandum for Record). Raleigh: State of North Carolina Department of Transportation .
8.
Migletz, J. , & Graham, J. (2002). NCHRP synthesis 306 long-term pavement marking practicesWashington, DC: Transportation Research Board .
9.
Migletz, J. , Graham, J. , Harwood, D.W. , & Bauer, K.M. (2001). Service life of durable pavement markings. In Transportation Research Record1749 (pp. 13-21). Washington, DC: National Research Council, Transportation Research Board .
Sarasua, W.A. , Clarke, D.B. , & Davis, W.J. (2003). Evaluation of interstate pavement marking retroreflectivity (Report No. FHWA-SC-03-01). Columbia: South Carolina Department of Transportation .
12.
Texas Transportation Institute. (2001). Summary of evaluation findings for 30 meter handheld and mobile pavement marking retroreflectometers (Draft technical evaluation report). Washington, DC: Highway Innovative Technology Evaluation Center, Civil Engineering Research Foundation .
13.
Turner, J.D. (1998). Pavement marking retroreflectivity: Research overview and recommendations (Unpublished report). McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration , Office of Safety and Traffic Operations.
14.
U.S. Congress. (1993). United States Department of Transportation and Related Agency Appropriation Act of 1993. Washington, DC: GPO .
15.
Vereen, S.C. , Hummer, J.E. , & Rasdorf, W.J. (2004). Alternative approaches for state agencies to address the proposed minimum retroreflectivity standards. Public Works Management andPolicy, 8(4), 235-248 .
16.
Wilson-Orndoff, C.J. (2003). Citizen-based priorities in transportation. Public Works Management andPolicy, 7(4), 256-266 .
