To test if inhibitory control was a significant predictor for arithmetic in children with ADHD and if the relationship between inhibitory control and arithmetic was mediated by working memory.
Methods:
Eighty-four children (ADHD, n = 54; Non-ADHD, n = 30) were tested on their interference control, behavioral inhibition, working memory, and arithmetic. Regression analysis was used to test the predictive role of inhibitory control in arithmetic. Moreover, mediation analysis was done to test whether working memory mediated the relationship between inhibitory control and arithmetic memory.
Results:
Interference control but not behavioral inhibition was a significant predictor for arithmetic. In addition, interference control had direct and indirect effects via working memory on arithmetic.
Conclusions:
Results demonstrated that inhibitory control contributed to arithmetic in children with ADHD. Furthermore, interference control had direct and indirect effects via working memory on arithmetic, suggesting interventions for arithmetic difficulties should involve training on both inhibition and working memory.
AllowayT. P.GathercoleS. E.KirkwoodH.ElliottJ. (2008). Evaluating the validity of the Automated Working Memory Assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(7), 725–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802243828
5.
Al-SaadM. S. H.Al-JabriB.AlmarzoukiA. F. (2021). A review of working memory training in the management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Frontier in Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 686873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.686873
6.
AntoniniT. N.KingeryK. M.NaradM. E.LangbergJ. M.TammL.EpsteinJ. N. (2016). Neurocognitive and behavioral predictors of math performance in children with and without ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713504620
7.
AvgerinouV. A.TolmieA. (2020). Inhibitory control and cognitive load in fractions and decimals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(S1), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12321
8.
BarkleyR. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65
9.
BerwidO. G.Curko KeraE. A.MarksD. J.SantraA.BenderH. A.HalperinJ. M. (2005). Sustained attention and response inhibition in young children at risk for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(11), 1219–1229. https://doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.00417.x
10.
BrockiK.BohlinG. (2004). Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13: A dimensional and developmental study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(2), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2602
11.
BrockiK.RandallK. D.BohlinG.KernsK. A. (2008). Working memory in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder combined type: Are deficits modality specific and are they independent of impaired inhibitory control?Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(7), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390701754720
12.
BullR.LeeK. (2014). Executive functioning and mathematics achievement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12059
13.
CapriT.SantoddiE.FabioR. A. (2020). Multi-source interference task paradigm to enhance automatic and controlled processes in ADHD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 97, 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103542
14.
CastellanosF. X.ProalE. (2012). Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: Beyond the prefrontal-striatal model. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.007
15.
ChuF. W.vanMarleK.GearyD. C. (2016). Predicting children’s reading and mathematics achievement from early quantitative knowledge and domain-general cognitive abilities. Frontier in Psychology, 7, 775. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00775
16.
ClarkC. A. C.PritchardV. E.WoodwardL. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1176–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019672
ConnersC. K. (2008). Conners 3rd edition manual. Multi-Health Systems.
19.
CoulangesL.Abreu-MendozaR. A.VarmaS.UncapherM. R.GazzaleyA.AngueraJ.Rosenberg-LeeM. (2021). Linking inhibitory control to math achievement via comparison of conflicting decimal numbers. Cognition, 214, 104767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104767
20.
CowanN. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277
21.
CraggL.KeebleS.RichardsonS.RoomeH. E.GilmoreC. (2017). Direct and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievement. Cognition, 162, 12–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014
22.
CueliM.ArecesD.GarcíaT.AlvesR. A.González-Castro1P. (2020). Attention, inhibitory control and early mathematical skills in preschool students. Psicothema, 32(2), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.225
23.
DicksteinS. G.BannonK.CastellanosF. X.MilhamM. P. (2006). The neural correlates of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: An ALE meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(10), 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01671.x
24.
DovisS.Van der OordS.WiersR. W.PrinsP. J. M. (2015). Improving executive functioning in children with ADHD: Training multiple executive functions within the context of a computer game. A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. PLoS One, 10(4), e0121651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121651
25.
EspyK. A.McDiarmidM. M.CwikM. F.StaletsM. M.HambyA.SennT. E. (2004). The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(1), 465–486.
26.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA. (2004). The Relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
27.
GandolfiE.ViterboriP.TraversoL.UsaiM. C. (2014). Inhibitory processes in toddlers: A latent-variable approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00381
28.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.BaileyD. H. (2013). Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS One, 8(1), e54651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054651
29.
GeurtsH. M.BerghS. F. W. M.RuzzanoL. (2014). Prepotent response inhibition and interference control in autism spectrum disorders: Two meta-analyses. Autism Research, 7, 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1369
30.
GilmoreC.KeebleS.RichardsonS.CraggL. (2015). The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0659-y
31.
GrayS. A.ReeveR. A. (2016). Number-specific and general cognitive markers of preschoolers’ math ability profiles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 147, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.004
32.
GreenbergL. M. (2007). TOVA clinical manual: Test of variables of attention continuous performance test (visual only). TOVA Company.
33.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
34.
HuoS.ZhangX.LawY. K. (2021). Pathways to word reading and calculation skills in young Chinese children: From biologically primary skills to biologically secondary skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000647
35.
IvnikR. J.MalecJ. F.SmithG. E.TangalosE. G.PetersenR. C. (1996). Neuropsychological tests’ norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO. Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049608406689
36.
JanssenT. W. P.HeslenfeldD. J.van MourikR.LoganG. D.OosterlaanJ. (2015). Neural correlates of response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A controlled version of the stop-signal task. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 233, 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.07.007
37.
Jiménez-FigueroaG.Ardila-DuarteC.PinedaD. A.Acosta-LópezJ. E.Cervantes-HenríquezM. L.Pineda-AlhucemaW.Cervantes-GutierrezJ.Quintero-IbarraM.Sanchez-RojasM.VélezJ. I.Puentes-RozoP. J. (2017). Prepotent response inhibition and reaction times in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder from a Caribbean community. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, 9(4), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-017-0223-z
38.
JohnstoneS.BarryR.MarkovskaV.DimoskaA.ClarkeA. (2009). Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: A visual ERP investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.11.007
39.
KaufmannL.NuerkH.-C. (2006). Interference effects in a numerical Stroop paradigm in 9-to 12-year-old children with ADHD-C. Child Neuropsychology, 12, 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040500477483
40.
KaufmannL.NuerkH.-C. (2008). Basic number processing deficits in ADHD: A broad examination of elementary and complex number processing skills in 9- to 12-year-old children with ADHD-C. Developmental Science, 11(5), 692–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00718.x
41.
KimY.KohM. K.ParkK. J.LeeH.-J.YuG. E.KimH.-W. (2020). WISC-IV intellectual profiles in Korean children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Investigation, 17(5), 444–451. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2019.0312
42.
KlingbergT.FernellE.OlesenP. J.JohnsonM.GustafssonP.DahlstromK.GillbergC. G.ForssbergH.WesterbergH. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010
43.
KrämerU. M.SolbakkA.-K.FunderudI.LøvstadM.EndestadT.KnightR. T. (2013). The role of lateral prefrontal cortex in inhibitory motor control. Cortex, 49, 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.003
44.
LanX.LegareC. H.PonitzC. C.LiS.MorrisonF. J. (2011). Investigating the links between the subcomponents of executive function and academic achievement: A cross-cultural analysis of Chinese and American preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.001
45.
LeeK.NgE. L.NgS. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013843
46.
LenartowiczA.TruongH.SalgariG. C.BilderR. M.McGoughJ.McCrackenJ. T.LooS. K. (2019). Alpha modulation during working memory encoding predicts neurocognitive impairment in ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(8), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13042
MacLeodC.DunbarK. (1988). Training and stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.126
49.
MartinussenR.HaydenJ.Hogg-JohnsonS.TannockR. (2005). A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000153228.72591.73
50.
MartonK.EichornN.CampanelliL.ZakariasL. (2016). Working memory and interference control in children with specific language impairment. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(5), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12189
51.
McKayC.WijeakumarS.RafetsederE.ShingY. L. (2021). Disentangling age and schooling effects on inhibitory control development: An fNIRS investigation. Developmental Science, 25, e13205. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13205
52.
Melby-LervågM.HulmeC. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228
53.
MerkleyR.ThompsonJ.ScerifG. (2016). Of huge mice and tiny elephants: Exploring the relationship between inhibitory processes and preschool math skills. Frontier in Psychology, 6, 1903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01903
54.
MirandaA.ColomerC.FernándezI.PresentaciónM.-J. (2012). Executive functioning and motivation of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on problem solving and calculation tasks. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 17(1), 51–71.
55.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
56.
NiggJ. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.2.220
OberauerK. (2019). Working memory and attention: A conceptual analysis and review. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.58
59.
OrbachL.HerzogaM.FritzA. (2020). State- and trait-math anxiety and their relation to math performance in children: The role of core executive functions. Cognition, 200, 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104271
60.
PalladinoP. (2006). The role of interference control in working memory: A study with children at risk of ADHD. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(12), 2047–2055. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600917850
61.
PassolunghiM. C.MarzocchG. M.FiorilloF. (2005) Selective effect of inhibition of literal or numerical irrelevant information in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or arithmetic learning disorder (ALD). Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2803_1
62.
PinaV.CastilloA.KadoshR. C.FuentesL. J. (2015). Intentional and automatic numerical processing as predictors of mathematical abilities in primary school children. Frontier in Psychology, 6, 375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00375
63.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
64.
PurpuraD. J.SchmittS. A.GanleyC. M. (2017). Foundations of mathematics and literacy: The role of executive functioning components. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.010
65.
RahmanA. A.CarrollD. J.Andrews EspyK.WiebeS. A. (2017). Neural correlates of response inhibition in early childhood: Evidence from a Go/No-Go task. Developmental Neuropsychology, 42(5), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2017.1355917
66.
RahmiI.WimbartiS. (2018). Inhibition in ADHD and non-ADHD children ages 6-12 years. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2018.2008
67.
RiccioC.HomackS.JarrattK. P.WolfeM. E. (2006). Differences in academic and executive function domains among children with ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined types. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.010
68.
RobinsonK. M.DubéA. K. (2013). Children’s additive concepts: Promoting understanding and the role of inhibition. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.016
69.
Rodríguez-MartínezE. I.ValladaresA. A.Gómez-GonzálezJ.Diaz-SanchezJ. A.GómezC. M. (2021). Neurophysiological differences between ADHD and control children and adolescents during the recognition phase of a working memory task. Neuroscience Research, 164, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2020.03.011
70.
RoncadinC.Pascual-LeoneJ.RichJ.DennisM. (2007). Developmental relations between working memory and inhibitory control. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.10170S1355617707070099
71.
SalihuL.AroM.RäsänenP. (2018). Children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Relating mathematics skills and reading comprehension. Issues in Educational Research, 28(4), 1024–1038. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/salihu.pdf
72.
ScheresA.OosterlaanJ.GeyrtsH.Morein-ZamirS.MeiranN.SchutH.VlasveldL.SergeantJ. (2004). Executive functioning in boys with ADHD: Primarily an inhibition deficit?Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 569–594.
73.
SchmitzM.CadoreL.PaczkoM.KipperLChavesM.RohdeL. A.ClarissaM. C.KnijnikM. (2002). Neuropsychological performance in DSM-IV ADHD subtypes: An exploratory study with untreated adolescents. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47(9), 863–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370204700908
74.
SchrankF. A.MatherN.McGrewK. S. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of achievement. Riverside.
75.
SellaF.ReA. M.LucangeliD.CornoldiC.LemaireP. (2019). Strategy selection in ADHD characteristics children: A study in arithmetic. Journal of Attention Disorders, 23(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712438766
76.
ShenC.LuoQ.JiaT.ZhaoQ.DesrivièresS.QuinlanE. B.BanaschewskiT.MillenetS.BokdeA. L. W.BüchelC.FlorH.FrouinV.GaravanH.GowlandP.HeinzA.IttermannB.MartinotJ.-L.ArtigesE.Paillere-MartinotM.-L.. . . SahakianB. J. (2020). Neural correlates of the dual-pathway model for ADHD in adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 844–854. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19020183
77.
SibleyM. H.GrazianoP. A.OrtizM.RodriguezL.CoxeS. (2019). Academic impairment among high school students with ADHD: The role of motivation and goal-directed executive functions. Journal of School Psychology, 77, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.005
78.
SilvaD.ColvinL.GlauertR.StanleyF.JoisR. S.BowerC. (2020). Literacy and numeracy underachievement in boys and girls with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorder, 24(10), 1392–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054715613438
79.
SolantoM. V.GilbertS. N.RajA.ZhuJ.Pope-BoydS.StepakB.VailL.NewcornJ. H. (2007). Neurocognitive functioning in AD/HD, predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(5), 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9123-6
80.
St Clair-ThompsonH.GathercoleS. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500162854
81.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
82.
SwickD.AshleyV.TurkenU. (2011). Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks. NeuroImage, 56, 1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.070
83.
SzucsD.DevineA.SolteszF.NobesA.GabrielF. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex, 49, 2674–2688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007
84.
ThorellL. (2007). Do delay aversion and executive function deficits make distinct contributions to the functional impact of ADHD symptoms? A study of early academic skill deficits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(11), 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01777.x
85.
TraversoL.MantiniC.UsaiM. C.ViterboriP. (2015, September25–27). The relationship between inhibition and working memory in preschoolers: Evidence for different inhibitory abilities. In AireniGBaraB. G.SandiniG.CrucianiM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the EuroAsianpacific Joint Conference on Cognitive Science/4th European Conference on Cognitive Science/11th International Conference on Cognitive Science, Toronto, Italy. Volume 1419 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS. Org.
86.
ValcanD. S.DavisaH. L.Pino-PasternakD.MalpiqueA. A. (2020). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics, reading and writing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 70, 101196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101196
87.
Van DoorenW.InglisM. (2015). Inhibitory control in mathematical thinking, learning and problem solving: A survey. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0715-2
88.
ViarougeA.HoudéO.BorstG. (2019). Evidence for the role of inhibition in numerical comparison: A negative priming study in 7- to 8-year-olds and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.011
WangE.SunL.SunM.HuangJ.TaoY.ZhaoX.WuZ.DingY.NewmanD. P.BellgroveM. A.WangY.SongY. (2016). Attentional selection and suppression in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 1, 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.01.004
91.
WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.SieglerR. S.Davis-KeanP. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660
92.
WesselJ. (2017). Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variations of the go/no-go paradigm. Psychophysiology, 55(3), e12871. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12871
93.
ZhuY. (2022). Reading matters more than mathematics in science learning: An analysis of the relationship between student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2007552
