Objective: This study compares the performance in a continuous performance test within a virtual reality classroom (CPT-VRC) between medicated children with ADHD, unmedicated children with ADHD, and healthy children. Method:N = 94 children with ADHD (n = 26 of them received methylphenidate and n = 68 were unmedicated) and n = 34 healthy children performed the CPT-VRC. Omission errors, reaction time/variability, commission errors, and body movements were assessed. Furthermore, ADHD questionnaires were administered and compared with the CPT-VRC measures. Results: The unmedicated ADHD group exhibited more omission errors and showed slower reaction times than the healthy group. Reaction time variability was higher in the unmedicated ADHD group compared with both the healthy and the medicated ADHD group. Omission errors and reaction time variability were associated with inattentiveness ratings of experimenters. Head movements were correlated with hyperactivity ratings of parents and experimenters. Conclusion: Virtual reality is a promising technology to assess ADHD symptoms in an ecologically valid environment.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.
2.
AdamsR.FinnP.MoesE.FlanneryK.RizzoA. S. (2009). Distractibility in attention/deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): The virtual reality classroom. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 120-135.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
5.
AndreouP.NealeB. M.ChenW.ChristiansenH.GabrielsI.HeiseA.. . . KuntsiJ. (2007). Reaction time performance in ADHD: Improvement under fast-incentive condition and familial effects. Psychological Medicine, 37, 1703-1715.
6.
Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist. (1998). Elternfragebogen über das Verhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Deutsche Bearbeitung der Child Behavior Checklist [Parent questionnaire for behavior of children and adolescent. German translation of the Child Behavior Checklist] (CBCL/4-18). Köln, Germany: Arbeitsgruppe Kinder-, Jugend- und Familiendiagnostik (KJFD).
7.
BarkleyR. A. (1991). The ecological validity of laboratory and analogue assessment methods of ADHD symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 149-178.
8.
BarkleyR. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65-94.
9.
BioulacS.LallemandS.RizzoA.PhilipP.FabrigouleC.BouvardM. P. (2012). Impact of time on task on ADHD patient’s performances in a virtual classroom. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 16, 514-521.
10.
BoonstraA. M.KooijJ. J.OosterlaanJ.SergeantJ. A.BuitelaarJ. K. (2005). Does methylphenidate improve inhibition and other cognitive abilities in adults with childhood-onset ADHD?Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 278-298.
11.
CastellanosF. X.TannockR. (2002). Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: The search for endophenotypes. Neuroscience, 3, 617-628.
CorkumP. V.SiegelL. S. (1993). Is the continuous performance task a valuable research tool for use with children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 1217-1239.
14.
DaneA. V.SchacharR. J.TannockR. T. (2000). Does actigraphy differentiate ADHD subtypes in a clinical Research setting?Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 752-760.
15.
de ZeeuwP.Aarnoudse-MoensC.BijlhoutJ.KonigC.UiterweerA. P.PapanikolauA.. . . OosterlaanJ. (2008). Inhibitory performance, response speed, intraindividual variability, and response accuracy in ADHD. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 808-816.
16.
Díaz-OruetaU.Garcia-LópezC.Crespo-EguílazN.Sánchez-CarpinteroR.ClimentG.NarbonaJ. (2014). AULA virtual reality test as an attention measure: Convergent validity with Conners’ Continuous Performance Test. Child Neuropsychology, 20, 328-342.
17.
DöpfnerM.LehmkuhlG. (2003). Diagnostik-System für psychische Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter nach ICD-10/DSM-IV [Diagnostic-system for mental disorders in child and adolescent age according to ICD10/DSM-IV] (DISYPS-KJ). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
18.
EpsteinJ. N.ErkanliA.ConnersC. K.KlaricJ.CostelloJ. E.AngoldA. (2003). Relations between Continuous Performance Test performance measures and ADHD Behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 543-554.
19.
EysenckS. B.EastingG.PearsonP. R. (1984). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 315-321.
20.
FriedmanD.VaughanH.Erlenmeyer-KimlingL. (1978). Stimulus and response related components of the late positive complex in visual discrimination tasks. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 45, 319-330.
21.
HassonR.FineJ. G. (2012). Gender differences among children with ADHD on continuous performance tests: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16, 190-198.
22.
HerveyA. S.EpsteinJ. N.CurryJ. F.TonevS.Eugene ArnoldL.Keith ConnersC.. . .HechtmanL. (2006). Reaction time distribution analysis of neuropsychological performance in an ADHD sample. Child Neuropsychology, 12, 125-140.
23.
Huang-PollockC. L.KaralunasS. L.TamH.MooreA. N. (2012). Evaluating vigilance deficits in ADHD: A meta-analysis of CPT performance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 360-371.
24.
HuberM.KirchlerE.NiederhoferH.GruberL. (2007). Neuropsychiatrie des Methylphenidat bei der Aufmerksamkeits−Defizit/Hyperaktivitäts−Störung (ADHS) [Neuropsychiatric bases of the methylphenidate-therapy of the attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)]. Fortschritte der Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 75, 275-284.
25.
IriarteY.Diaz-OruetaU.CuetoE.IrazustabarrenaP.BanterlaF.ClimentG. (2016). AULA—Advanced virtual reality tool for the assessment of attention: Normative study in Spain. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20, 542-568.
LosierB. J.McGrathP. J.KleinR. M. (1996). Error patterns of the Continuous Performance Test in non-medicated and medicated samples of children with and without ADHD: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 971-987.
28.
MelchersP.PreußU. (2003). K-ABC Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
29.
MichaelR. I.KlormanR.SalzmanL. F.BorgstedtA. D.DainerK. B. (1981). Normalizing effects of methylphenidate on hyperactive children’s vigilance performance and evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 18, 665-677.
30.
NegutA.MatuS. A.SavaF. A.DavidD. (2016). Virtual reality measures in neuropsychological assessment: A meta-analytic review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 165-184.
31.
NicholsS. L.WaschbuschD. A. (2004). A review of the validity of laboratory cognitive tasks used to assess symptoms of ADHD. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 34, 297-315.
32.
NiggJ.WillcuttE.DoyleA.Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S. (2005). Causal heterogeneity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Do we need neuropsychologically impaired subtypes?Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1224-1230.
33.
ParsonsT. D.BowerlyT.BuckwalterJ. G.RizzoA. A. (2007). A controlled clinical comparison of attention performance in children with ADHD in a virtual reality classroom compared to standard neuropsychological methods. Child Neuropsychology, 13, 363-381.
34.
PetermannF.PetermannU. (2007). HAWIK-IV Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder - IV [Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligence test for children - IV]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
35.
PolanczykG. V.SalumG. A.SugayaL. S.CayeA.RohdeL. A. (2015). Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 345-365.
36.
PollakY.ShomalyH. B.WeissP. L.RizzoA. A.Gross-TsurV. (2010). Methylphenidate effect in children with ADHD can be measured by an ecologically valid continuous performance test embedded in virtual reality. CNS Spectrums, 15, 125-130.
37.
PollakY.WeissP. L.RizzoA. A.ShrikiL.Gross-TsurV.ShalevR. S.WeizerM. (2009). The utility of a continuous performance test embedded in virtual reality in measuring ADHD-related deficits. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 30, 2-6.
38.
RapportM. D.ChungK. M.ShoreG.DenneyC. B.IsaacsP. (2000). Upgrading the science and technology of assessment and diagnosis: Laboratory and clinic-based assessment of children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 555-568.
39.
RizzoA. A.BowerlyT.BuckwalterJ. G.KlimchukD.MituraR.ParsonsT. D. (2006). A virtual reality scenario for all seasons: The virtual classroom. CNS Spectrums, 11, 35-44.
40.
RizzoA. A.BowerlyT.ShahabiC.BuckwalterJ.KlimchukD.MituraR. (2004). Diagnosing attention disorders in a virtual classroom. Computer, 37, 87-89.
41.
RizzoA. A.BuckwalterJ. G.BowerlyT.van der ZaagC.HumphreyL.NeumannU.. . . SisemoreD. (2000). The virtual classroom: A virtual reality environment for the assessment and rehabilitation of attention deficits. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 483-499.
42.
RizzoA. A.SchultheisM. T. (2002). Expanding the boundaries of psychology: The application of virtual reality. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 134-140.
43.
RosvoldH. E.MirskyA. F.SarasonI.BransomeE. D.Jr.BeckL. H. (1956). A continuous performance test of brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20, 343-350.
44.
ScheresA.OosterlaanJ.GeurtsH.Morein-ZamirS.MeiranN.SchutH. (2004). Executive functioning in boys with ADHD: Primarily an inhibition deficit?Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 569-594.
45.
SchultheisM. T.HimelsteinJ.RizzoA. A. (2002). Virtual reality and neuropsychology: Upgrading the current tools. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 378-394.
46.
SpencerT. J.BiedermanJ.MickE. (2007). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Diagnosis, lifespan, comorbidities, and neurobiology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 631-642.
47.
StadlerC.JankeW. (2003). Concurrent validity of the German version of S.B. Eysenck’s impulsiveness questionnaire for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 51-58.
48.
StadlerC.JankeW.SchmeckK. (2004). IVE. Inventar zur Erfassung von Impulsivität, Risikoverhalten und Empathie bei 9- bis 14-jährigen Kindern [Inventory to assess impulsivity, risk behavior and empathy in 9 to 14 year old children]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
49.
TewesU.RossmannP.SchallbergerU. (2002). HAWIK-III Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder - III [Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligence test for children - III]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
50.
WeißR. H. (1998). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 [Culture Fair Intelligence Test scale 2]-CFT20. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
