How Is ADHD Assessed and Documented? Examination of Psychological Reports Submitted to Determine Eligibility for Postsecondary Disability

Abstract

Objective: To examine how ADHD evaluations are documented for postsecondary students requesting disability eligibility. Method: A total of 100 psychological reports submitted for eligibility determination were coded for documentation of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria, methods and instruments used in the evaluations, and recommended academic accommodations. Results: Results showed that a minimal number of reports (≤1%) documented that students met all DSM criteria for ADHD. Psychologists rarely documented childhood impairment, symptoms across settings, or the use of rule-outs. Symptom severity was emphasized over current impairment. The majority of psychologists utilized a multi-informant, multi-method evaluation approach, but certain methods (e.g., symptom validity tests, record reviews) were limited in use. Most reports included recommendations for academic accommodations, with extended time being the most common (72%). Conclusion: This study raises awareness to the aspects of adequate ADHD evaluation and subsequent documentation that can be improved by psychologists. Recommendations are made regarding valid documentation of ADHD for disability determination purposes.

Keywords

ADHD college students ADHD impairment assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

L. A.

Spencer

Stein

M. A.

Newcorn

J. H.

(2008). Best practices in adult ADHD: Epidemiology, impairments, and differential diagnosis. CNS Spectrums, 13, 1-18.

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2007). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 894-921.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Americans with Disabilities Act Title III Regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 36 (2010). Retrieved from http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/titleIII_2010/titleIII_2010_regulations.htm#a309

Barkley

R. A.

(2003). Issues in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Brain & Development, 2, 77-83. doi:10.1016/S03877604(02)00152-3

Barkley

R. A.

(2011). Barkley Functional Impairment Scale. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Barkley

R. A.

Cunningham

C. E.

Gordon

Faraone

Lewandowski

Murphy

K. R.

(2006). ADHD symptoms vs. impairment: Revisited. The ADHD Report, 14, 1-9.

Booksh

R. L.

Pella

R. D.

Singh

A. N.

Gouvier

W. D.

(2010). Ability of college students to simulate ADHD on objective measures of attention. Journal of Attention Disorders, 13, 325-338. doi:10.1177/1087054708329927

10.

Burgoyne

R. A.

Mew

C. M.

(2011). New regulations under Titles II and III of the ADA: What has changed relative to the administration of licensing examinations? The Bar Examiner, 80, 42-52.

11.

Bush

S. S.

Ruff

R. M.

Troster

A. I.

Barth

J. T.

Koffler

S. P.

Pliskin

N. H.

. . .Silver

C. H.

(2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419-426. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002

12.

Demaray

M. K.

Schaefer

Delong

L. K.

(2003). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A national survey of training and current assessment practices in the schools. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 583-597. doi:10.1002/pits.10129

13.

Diller

(2010). ADHD in the college student: Is anyone else worried? Journal of Attention Disorders, 14, 3-6. doi:10.1177/10870754710361585

14.

Dombrowski

S. C.

Kamphaus

R. W.

Reynolds

C. R.

(2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 364-372. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.35.4.364

15.

Faraone

S. V.

Sergeant

Gillberg

Biederman

(2003). The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: Is it an American condition? World Psychiatry, 2, 104-113.

16.

Faust

Hart

Guilmette

T. J.

Arkes

H. R.

(1988). Neuropsychologists’ capacity to detect adolescent malingerers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 508-515. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.19.5.508

17.

Fisher

A. B.

Watkins

M. W.

(2008). ADHD rating scales’ susceptibility to faking in a college student sample. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 20, 81-92.

18.

Gathje

R. A.

Lewandowski

L. J.

Gordon

(2008). The role of impairment in the diagnosis of ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 11, 529-537. doi:10.1177/1087054-707314028

19.

Gibbins

Weiss

(2007). Clinical recommendations in current practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in adults. Current Psychiatry Reports, 9, 420-426. doi:10.1007/s11920-007-0055-1

20.

Gordon

Antshel

Faraone

Barkley

Lewandowski

Hudziak

J. J.

. . .Cunningham

(2006). Symptoms versus impairment: The case for respecting DSM-IV’s Criterion D. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 465-475. doi:10.1177/1087054705283881

21.

Gordon

Lewandowski

Murphy

Dempsey

(2002). ADA-based accommodations in higher education: A survey of clinicians about documentation requirements and diagnostic standards. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 357-363. doi:10.1177/00222194020350040601

22.

Gordon

Murphy

K. R.

Keiser

(1998). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and test accommodations. The Bar Examiner, 67, 26-36.

23.

Government Accountability Office. (2009, October). Higher education and disability: Education needs a coordinated approach to improve its assistance to schools in supporting students (Report to the Chairman, Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, GAO-10-33). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1033.pdf

24.

Gregg

Hoy

(1990). Identifying the learning disabled. Journal of College Admissions, 129, 30-33.

25.

Handler

M. W.

DuPaul

G. J.

(2005). Assessment of ADHD: Differences across psychology specialty areas. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 402-412. doi:10.1177/073428290-6298264

26.

Harrison

A. G.

Lovett

B. J.

Gordon

(2013). Documenting disabilities in postsecondary settings: Diagnosticians’ understanding of legal regulations and diagnostic standards. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28, 303-322. doi:10.1177/0829573513508527

27.

Joy

J. A.

Julius

R. J.

Akter

Baron

D. A.

(2010). Assessment of ADHD documentation from candidates requesting Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations for the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners COMPLEX exam. Journal of Attention Disorders, 14, 104-108. doi:10.1177/1087054710365056

28.

Koonce

D. A.

(2007). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder assessment practices by practicing school psychologists. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 319-333. doi:10.1177/0734282906298264

29.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. doi:10.2307/2529310

30.

Lewandowski

Lambert

T. L.

Lovett

B. J.

Panahon

C. J.

Sytsma

M. R.

(2014). College students’ preferences for test accommodations. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29, 116-126. doi:10.1177/0829573514522116

31.

Lindstrom

Nelson

J. M.

Foels

(2013). Postsecondary ADHD documentation requirements: Common practices in the context of clinical issues, legal standards, and empirical findings. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1087054713506262

32.

Lovett

B. J.

(2010). Extended time testing accommodations for students with disabilities: Answers to five fundamental questions. Review of Educational Research, 80, 611-638. doi:10.3102/0034654310364063

33.

Lovett

B. J.

(2014). Testing accommodations under the Amended Americans with Disabilities Act: The voice of empirical research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25, 81-90. doi:10.1177/1044207312469830

34.

Lovett

B. J.

Gordon

Lewandowski

L. J.

(2009). Measuring impairment in a legal context: Practical considerations in the evaluation of psychiatric and learning disabilities. In Goldstein

Naglieri

(Eds.), Assessing impairment: From theory to practice (pp. 93-103). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-87542-2_8

35.

Lovett

B. J.

Leja

A. M.

(2013). Students’ perceptions of testing accommodations: What we know, what we need to know, and why it matters. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 29, 72-89. doi:10.1080/15377903.2013.751477

36.

Marshall

Schroeder

O’Brien

Fischer

Ries

Blesi

Barker

(2010). Effectiveness of symptom validity measures in identifying cognitive and behavioral symptom exaggeration in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 1204-1237. doi:10.1080/13854046.2010.514290

37.

McGuire

J. M.

Madaus

J. W.

Litt

A. V.

Ramirez

M. O.

(1996). An investigation of documentation submitted by university students to verify their learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 297-304. doi:10.1177/002221949602900308

38.

Miller

L. A.

Lewandowski

L. J.

Antshel

K. M.

(2013). Effects of extended time for college students with and without ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1087054713483308

39.

Murphy

(2012). ADHD and test accommodations: Impact of the new ADA Amendments Act. The ADHD Report, 20, 10-13. doi:10.1521/adhd.2012.20.3.10

40.

Murphy

Gordon

(2006). Assessment of adults with ADHD. In Barkley

R. A.

(Ed.), Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed., pp. 425-452). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

41.

Musso

M. W.

Gouvier

W. D.

(2012). “Why is this so hard?” A review of detection of malingered ADHD in college students. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1-16. doi:10.1177/1087054712441970

42.

National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2007). The documentation disconnect for students with learning disabilities: Improving access to postsecondary disability services. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 265-274. doi:10.2307/25474638

43.

Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as Amended, 29 C.F.R. § 1630 (2011). Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-03-25/pdf/2011-6056.pdf

44.

Sibley

M. H.

Pelham

W. E.

Molina

B. S. G.

Gnagy

E. M.

Waxmonsky

J. G.

. . .Kuriyan

A. B.

(2012). When diagnosing ADHD in young adults emphasize informant reports, DSM items, and impairment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 1052-1061. doi:10.1037/a0029098

45.

Sullivan

B. K.

May

Galbally

(2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 189-207. doi:10.1080/09084-280701509083

46.

Taylor

Deb

Unwin

(2011). Scales for the identification of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 924-938. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.036

47.

Tobin

R. M.

Schneider

W. J.

Reck

S. G.

Landau

(2008). Best practices in the assessment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Linking assessment to response to intervention. In Thomas

Grimes

(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 617-633). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

48.

Willcutt

E. G.

Carlson

C. L.

(2005). The diagnostic validity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Neuroscience, 5, 219-232. doi:10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.003

49.

Wolforth

(2012). Why we need reliable, valid, and appropriate learning disability assessments: The perspective of a postsecondary disability provider. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 58-71. doi:10.1177/0829573512-437025