Objective: Unlike rating scales that focus on the severity of ADHD symptoms, the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD-Symptoms and Normal-Behaviors (SWAN) rating scale is phrased in neutral or positive terms for carers to compare the index child’s behaviors with that of their peers. This study explores its psychometric properties when applied to Chinese children in Hong Kong. Method: Ratings from the Chinese SWAN scale collected from parents and teachers of a community sample of 3,722 6- to 12-year-old students recruited by stratified random sampling were compared with 247 clinic children with a diagnosis of ADHD. Reliability, validity, factor structure, and cutoff scores were calculated. Results: Favorable psychometrics and a two-factor structure identical to the original were reproduced. Cutoff scores were supported by satisfactory sensitivities and specificities. Conclusion: The SWAN scale is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of ADHD symptoms in Chinese children in Hong Kong.
AbikoffH. B.VitielloB.RiddleM. A.CunninghamC.GreenhillL. L.SwansonJ. M.. . .WigalT. (2007). Methylphenidate effects on functional outcomes in the preschoolers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment study (PATS). Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 17, 581-592.
2.
AchenbachT. M. (1991a). Manual for the CBCL/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
3.
AchenbachT. M. (1991b). Manual for the TRF and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
4.
AchenbachT. M.McConaughyS. H.HowellC. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213-232.
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
6.
CaninoG.AlegriaM. (2008). Psychiatric diagnosis—Is it universal or relative to culture?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 237-250.
7.
CornishK. M.ManlyT.SavageR.SwansonJ.MorisanoD.ButlerN.. . .HollisC. P. (2005). Association of the dopamine transporter (DAT-1) 10/10-repeat genotype with ADHD symptoms and response inhibition in a general population sample. Molecular Psychiatry, 10, 686-698.
8.
GauS. S. F.LinC. H.HuF. C.ShangC. Y.SwansonJ. M.LiuY. C.LiuS. K. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, Version IV Scale–Teacher Form. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 850-861.
9.
GauS. S. F.ShangC. Y.LiuS. K.LinC. H.SwansonJ. M.LiuY. C.TuC. L. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, Version IV Scale–Parent Form. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 17, 35-44.
10.
GauS. S. F.SoongW. T.ChiuY. N.TsaiW. C. (2006). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Conners’ Parent and Teacher Rating Scales–Revised: Short Form. Journal of Attention Disorder, 9, 648-659.
11.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345.
12.
HayD.BennettK. S.LevyF.SergeantJ.SwansonJ. (2007). A twin study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder dimensions rated by the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD-symptoms and Normal-behavior (SWAN) Scale. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 700-705.
13.
HoT. P.LeungP. W. L.LukE. S. L.TaylorE.Bacon-ShoneJ.Lieh-MakF. (1996). Establishing the constructs of childhood behavioral disturbances in a Chinese population: A questionnaire study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 417-431.
14.
IvanovaM. Y.AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A.DumenciL.AlmqvistF.BathicheM.. . .VerhulstF. C. (2007). Testing the teacher’s report form syndromes in 20 societies. School Psychology Review, 36, 468-483.
15.
IvanovaM. Y.DobreanA.DopfnerM.ErolN.FombonneE.FonsecaA. C.. . .ChenW. J. (2007). Testing the 8-Syndrome Structure of the Child Behaviour Checklist in 30 societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 405-417.
16.
LaheyB. B.ApplegateB.McBurnettK.BiedermanJ.GreenhillL.HydnG. W.. . .RichtersJ. (1994). DSM-IV field trials for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1673-1685.
17.
LaheyB. B.PelhamW. E.LoneyJ.LeeS. S.WillcuttE. (2005). Instability of the DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD from preschool through elementary school. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 896-902.
18.
LaiK. Y. C.LukE. S. L.LeungP. W. L.WongA. S. Y.LawL.HoK. (2010). Validation of the Chinese version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Hong Kong. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 1179-1186. doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0152-z
19.
LeungP. W. L.HungS. F.HoT. P.LeeC. C.LiuW. S.TangC. P.KwongS. L. (2008). Prevalence of DSM-IV disorders in Chinese adolescents and the effects of an impairment criterion. A pilot community study in Hong Kong. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 452-461.
20.
LeungP. W. L.KwongS. L.TangC. P.HoT. P.HungS. F.LeeC. C.. . .LiuW. S. (2006). Test-retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 970-973.
21.
LevyF.HayD. A.McStephenM.WoodC.WaldmanI. (1997). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A category of a continuum? Genetic analysis of a large-scale twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 737-744.
22.
LuiM.TannockR. (2007). Working memory and inattentive behavior in a community sample of children. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 12. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-3-12
23.
LukS. L.LeungP. W. (1989). Conners’ Teacher’s Rating Scale—A validity study in Hong Kong. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 785-793.
24.
LukS. L.LeungP. W. L.LeeP. L. M. (1988). Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale in Chinese children in Hong Kong. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29, 165-174.
25.
PaceC. R.FriedlanderJ. (1982). The meaning of response categories: How often is “occasionally,” “often,” and “very often.”Research in Higher Education, 17, 267-281.
26.
PolanczykG.de LimaM. S.HortaB. L.BiedermanJ.RohdeL. A. (2007). The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: A systematic review and metaregression analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 942-948.
27.
PoldermanT. J. C.DerksE. M.HudziakJ. J.VerhulstF. C.PosthumaD.BoomsmaD. I. (2007). Across the continuum of attention skills: A twin study of the SWAN ADHD rating scale. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 1080-1087.
28.
RobaeyP.AmreD.SchacharR.SimardL. (2007). French version of the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behaviours (SWAN-F) Questionnaire. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 16, 80-89.
29.
SwansonJ.SchuckS.MannM.CarlsonC.HartmanK.SergeantJ.. . .WasdellM. (2005). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: The SNAP and the SWAN rating scales. Available at www.adhd.net
30.
VitielloB.AbikoffH. B.ChuangS. Z.KollinsS. H.McCrackenJ. T.RiddleM. A.. . .GreenhillL. L. (2007). Effectiveness of methylphenidate in the 10-month continuation phase of the preschoolers with ADHD treatment study (PATS). Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 17, 593-603.
31.
VolkowN. D.WangG. J.KollinsS. H.WigalT. L.NewcornJ. H.TelangF.. . .SwansonM. (2009). Evaluating dopamine reward pathway in ADHD: Clinical implications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 1084-1091.
32.
WongC. K.ChoiM. M. (1999). Mental health of Hong Kong children. In PrydeN. A.TsoiM. M. (Eds.), Hong Kong’s children (pp. 153-220). Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, The University of Hong Kong.
