Objective: To examine whether participants with ADHD showed a deficit in Stroop/reverse-Stroop interference by comparing them to non-ADHD participants. Method: A group with ADHD, primarily inattentive type (n = 15), and a paired non-ADHD group (n = 15) completed the group version of the Stroop/reverse-Stroop test. Results: Asymmetric interference was observed between the Stroop test and the reverse-Stroop test in ADHD participants, presenting evidence contrary to Barkley’s behavioral inhibition model of ADHD in which response inhibition deficits pertained only to the ADHD-C subtype. Conclusion: Participants with ADHD showed a control deficit in reverse-Stroop interference but not in Stroop interference.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AngoldA.PrendergastA.CoxR.HarringtonE.SimonoffE.RutterM. (1995). The child and adolescent psychiatric assessment (CAPA). Psychological Medicine, 25, 739-753.
4.
BarkleyR. A. (1990). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
BarkleyR. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65-94.
6.
BushG.WhalenP. J.RosenB. R.JenikeM. A.McInerneyS. C.RauchS. L. (1998). The counting Stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—Validation study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 270-282.
7.
CarterC. S.BotvinickM. M.CohenJ. D. (1999). The contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex to executive processes in cognition. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 10, 49-57.
8.
CarterC. S.BraverT. S.BarchD. M.BotvinickM. M.NollD.CohenJ. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
9.
CarterC. S.MacdonaldA. M.BotvinickM.RossL. L.StengerV. A.NollD.CohenJ. D. (2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 1944-1954.
10.
CollaM.EndeG.AlmB.DeuschleM.HeuserI.KronenbergG. (2008). Cognitive MR spectroscopy of anterior cingulate cortex in ADHD: Elevated choline signal correlates with slowed hit reaction times. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42, 587-595.
11.
ConnersC. K. (1995). The Conners rating scales: Instruments for the assessments of childhood psychopathology. Durham, NC: Duke University.
12.
ConnersC. K. (1998). Rating scales in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder use in assessment, and treatment and monitoring. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 24-30.
13.
DoyleA. E.BiedermanJ.SeidmanL. J.WeberW.FaraoneS. V. (2000). Diagnostic efficiency of neuropsychological test scores for discriminating boys with and without attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 477-488.
14.
EmondV.JoyalC.PoissantH. (2009). Structural and functional neuroanatomy of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Encephale, 35, 107-114.
15.
FlowersJ. H. (1975). “Sensory” interference in a word-color matching task. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 37-43.
16.
GoldenZ. L.GoldenC. J. (2002). Patterns of performance on the Stroop Color and Word test in children with learning, attentional, and psychiatric disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 39(5), 489-495.
17.
HakodaY. J.SasakiM. (1990). Group version of the Stroop and reverse-Stroop test—The effects of reaction mode, order and practice. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 389-394.
18.
HakodaY. J.SasakiM. (1991). Two interferences based on new Stroop test and reaction model (Report No. 3). Fukuoka: Japan, Kyushu University, Department of Information Systems.
19.
HerveyA. S.EpsteinJ. N.CurryJ. F. (2004). Neuropsychology of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology, 18, 485-503.
20.
HomackS.RiccioC. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Stroop color and word test with children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 725-743.
21.
HoughtonS.DouglasG.WestJ.WhitingK.WallM.LangsfordS.CarrollA. (1999). Differential patterns of executive function in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder according to gender and subtype. Journal of Child Neurology, 14, 801-805.
22.
HowiesonD. B.LezakM. D.LoringD. W. (2004). Orientation and attention. In LezakM. D.HowiesonD. B.LoringD. W.Julia HannayH.FischerJ. S. (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment (pp. 365-367). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
IkedaY.HirataS.OkuzumiH. (2009). Features of Stroop/reverse-Stroop interference in two ways of reaction. Report of Educational Summarization of Tokyo Gakugei University. Bulletin of Tokyo Gakugei University. Educational Sciences, 60, 231-235.
24.
LansbergenM. M.KenemansJ. L.van EngelandH. (2007). Stroop interference and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology, 21, 251-262.
25.
MacLeodC. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
26.
MakrisN.BiedermanJ.MonuteauxM. C.SeidmanL. J. (2009). Towards conceptualizing a neural systems-based anatomy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Neuroscience, 31, 36-49.
27.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). (2008, June6). Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder information page. Retrieved from http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/adhd/adhd.htm
28.
NiggJ. T.BlaskeyL. G.Huang-PollockM. A.RappleyM. D. (2002). Neuropsychological executive functions and DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 59-66.
29.
O’ConnellR. G.BellgroveM. A.DockreeP. M.LauA.HesterR.GaravanH.RobertsonI. H. (2009). The neural correlates of deficient error awareness in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Neuropsychologia, 47, 1149-1159.
30.
PenningtonB. F.OzonoffS. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51-87.
31.
QuayH. C. (1988). Attention deficit disorder and the behavioral inhibition system: The relevance of the neuropsychological theory of Jeffrey A. Gray. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
32.
ReeveW. V.SchandlerS. L. (2001). Frontal lobe functioning in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Adolescence, 36, 749-765.
33.
RuffC. C.WoodwardT. S.LaurensK. R.LiddleP. F. (2001). The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in conflict processing: Evidence from reverse Stroop interference. NeuroImage, 14, 1150-1158.
34.
SavitzJ. B.JansenP. (2003). The Stroop color-word interference test as an indicator of ADHD in poor readers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 319-333.
35.
SchmitzM.CadoreL.PaczkoM.KipperL.ChavesM.RohdeL. A.KnijnikM. (2002). Neuropsychological performance in DSM-IV ADHD subtypes: An exploratory study with untreated adolescents. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 863-869.
36.
SergeantJ. A.GeurtsH.OosterlaanJ. (2002). How specific is a deficit of executive functioning for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?Behavioral Brain Research, 130, 3-28.
37.
Slaats-WillemseD.Swaab-BarneveldH.de SonnevilleL.van der MeulenE.BuitelaarJ. (2003). Deficient response inhibition as a cognitive endophenotype of ADHD. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 1242-1248.
38.
StraussE.ShermanE. M. S.SpreenO. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
40.
TannockR.MartinussenR.FrijtersJ. (2000). Naming speed performance and stimulant effects indicate effortful, semantic processing deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 237-252.
41.
Van MourikR.OosterlaanJ.SergeantJ. (2005). The Stroop revisited: A meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 150-165.
