The stop signal task (stop task) is designed to assess inhibitory control and is a frequently used research tool in clinical disorders such as ADHD and schizophrenia. Previous methods of setting stop signal delay and of assessing inhibitory control are problematic. The current study reports two modifications that improve the task as a measure of inhibitory control.
The first modification was to set stop signal delays proportional to go mean reaction time (go MRT) to better account for inter-subject variability in go MRT. Twenty-eight normal children were tested, and all standard, stop task dependent measures were obtained when delays were set by this method.
The second modification was to calculate a novel dependent measure called the area of inhibition (AOI) which provides a more complete measure of inhibitory control than the slope of the relative finishing time z-scores (ZRFT-slope). Implications for the assessment of inhibitory control in clinical populations are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC:. Author.
2.
Badcock, J. C., Michie, P. T., Johnson, L., & Combrinck, J. (2002). Acts of control in schizophrenia: Dissociating the components of inhibition. Psychological Medicine, 32(2), 287-297.
3.
Carter, J.D., Silberstein, R. B., Farrow, M., Tucker, A., Stough, C., & Pipingas, A. (2000, February). The stop-signal task: A comparison of auditory and visual stop-signals set proportional to mean reaction time. Poster session presented at the 10th World Congress of Psychophysiology, Sydney, Australia.
4.
Clarizio, H. F., & Veres, V. (1984). A short-form version of the WISC-R for the learning disabled. Psychology in the Schools, 21(2), 154-157.
5.
De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. D., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 164-182.
6.
Jennings, J. R., van der Molen, M. W., Pelham, W., Debski, K. B., & Hoza, B. (1997). Inhibition in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as indexed by heart rate change. Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 308-318.
7.
Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9(4), 491-512.
8.
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user’s guide to the stop-signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91(3), 295-327.
10.
Logan, G. D., Cowan, W. B., & Davis, K. A. (1984). On the ability to inhibit responses in simple and choice reaction time tasks: A model and a method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(2), 276-291.
11.
Michie, P. T., Badcock, J., Budd, T. W., Johnston, J., Wynne, B., & Johnson, L. (2000, December). Acts of control in schizophrenia: Evidence from electrophysiological measures of self-initiated action and behavioural measures of inhibition of action. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Psychophysiology, Adelaide, Australia.
12.
Oosterlaan, J., Logan, G. D., & Sergeant, J. A. (1998). Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD+CD, anxious, and control children: A meta-analysis of studies with the Stop Task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(3), 411-425.
13.
Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (1996). Inhibition in ADHD, aggressive, and anxious children: A biologically based model of child psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24(1), 19-36.
14.
Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1986). The point of no return in choice reaction time: Controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(3), 243-258.
15.
Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1990). Does motor programming necessitate response execution?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 183-198.
16.
Pliszka, S. R., Liotti, M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2000). Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism. Biological Psychiatry, 48(3), 238-246.
17.
Rubia, K., Oosterlaan, J., Sergeant, J. A., Brandeis, D., & Leeuwen, T. V. (1998). Inhibitory dysfunction in hyperactive boys. Behavioural Brain Research, 94(1), 25-32.
18.
Rubia, K., Russell, T., Bullmore, E. T., Soni, W., Brammer, M. J., Simmons, A., et al. (2001a). An fMRI study of reduced left prefrontal activation in schizophrenia during normal inhibitory function. Schizophrenia Research, 52(1-2), 47-55.
19.
Rubia, K., Russell, T., Overmeyer, S., Brammer, M. J., Bullmore, E. T., Sharma, T., et al. (2001b). Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. NeuroImage, 13(2), 250-261.
20.
Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., & Logan, G. (1995). Deficient inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23(4), 411-437.
21.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
