Objective: The attitudes, expectations, and behaviors of teachers toward children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) may have a lasting impact on the academic self-efficacy and success of students with ADHD. Yet, to date there exists no standardized measure of teacher attitudes or expectations toward children with ADHD. The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure teacher attitudes and expectancies toward children with ADHD.
Method: The Test of Knowledge About ADHD (KADD) was constructed based on the error-choice method, which is an indirect method of attitude measurement. This psychometric approach was utilized to reduce patterns of response distortions that produce systematic errors in direct attitudinal assessment. Elementary school teachers (N = 103) completed the error-choice instrument.
Conclusion: Results indicated adequate to good internal consistency reliability for the KADD for this sample, with a Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.82. Additionally, results yielded initial discriminant evidence to suggest that the KADD has construct valtdity for this sample. Implications for the use of this instrument in applied areas are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anastopoulos, A. (1992). Test of ADHD Knowledge. Unpublishcd manuscript , University of North CarolinaGreensboro.
2.
Antonak, R.F., & Livneh, H. (1995a). Direct and indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities, with an exegesis of the error-choice test method. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40, 3-24.
3.
Antonak, R.H., & Livneh, H. (1995b). Development, psychometric analysis, and validation of an error-choice test to measure attitudes toward persons with epilepsy . Rehabilitation Psychology, 40, 25-38.
4.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
5.
Barkley, R.A. (1990). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: The Guilford Press.
6.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7.
Burstin, K., Doughtie, E.B., & Raphaeli, A. (1980). Contrastive vignette technique: An indirect methodology designed to address reactive social attitude measurement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 147-165.
8.
Comrey, A.L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Cooper, H. (1979). Pygmalion grows up: A model for teacher expectation communication and performance influence. Review of Educational Research, 49, 389-410.
10.
Cooper, H., & Good, T. (1983). Pygmalion grows up: Studies in the expectation communication process. New York: Longman.
11.
De Vellis, R.F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and application. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
12.
Famighetti, R. (1997). The World Almanac and Book of Facts 1997. Mahwah, NJ: World Almanac Books.
13.
Good, T., & Brophy, T. (1980). Educational psychology: A realistic approach (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
14.
Greene, R.W., & Marchant, C. (1989). Student -Teacher Tension Checklist. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts General Hospital and Haward Medical School .
15.
Hammond, K.R. (1948). Measuring attitudes by error-choice: An indirect method. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 38-48.
16.
Himmelfarb, S. (1993). The measurement of attitudes. In Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes (pp. 23-87). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
17.
Humphreys, L.G., & Stubbs, J. (1977). A longitudinal analysis of teacher expectation, student expectation, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 261-270.
18.
Jones, E.E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.
19.
Jussim, L. (1989). Teacher expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 469-480.
Madon, S., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1997). In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 791-809.
22.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd cd.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
24.
Rosenthal, R. (1974). On the social psychology of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Further evidence for Pygmalion effects and their mediating mechanisms . New York: MSS Modular.
25.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and student intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 377-386.
27.
Rucker, C. & Gable, R. (1974). Rucker-Gable educational programming scale. Storrs, CT: Rucker-Gable Associates.
Selltiz, C., Wrightsman, L.S., & Cook, S.W. (1976). Research methods in social relations (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
30.
Tinstey, H.E.A., & Tinsley, D.J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414-424.
31.
Weinstein, R.S., Marshall, H.H., Sharp, L., & Botkin, M. (1987). Pygmalion and the student: Age and classroom differences in children's awareness of teacher expectations. Child Development , 58, 1079-1093.
