Designing With,not for Students: Prioritizing Student Voice Using Liberatory Design Thinking

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baxter Magolda

M. B

. (2003). Identity and learning: Student affairs’ role in transforming higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 44(2), 231–247.

Bloomquist

. (2020, June 03). How Jael Kerandi got the U of M to divest from the MPD. Retrieved from http://mspmag.com/arts-and-culture/jael-kerandi-u-of-m-divest-mpd/

Culver, K. C., Harper, J., & Kezar, A. (2022). Engaging design thinking in professional bureaucracies: Improving equity for non-tenure track faculty in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies, 3(1), 68–89.

Gonzalez

. (2020, June 10). BYU students, faculty debate requiring race and ethnicity classes. Retrieved from https://universe.byu.edu/2020/06/10/byu-students-faculty-debate- requiring-race-and-ethnicity-class/

Kleinglass

. (2005). Who is driving the changing landscape in student affairs? New Directions for Student Services, 2005(112), 25–38.

National Equity Center, Stanford d. school. (2020). Liberatory design: Mindsets and modes to design for equity (NEP prototype—February 2020). Retrieved from https://nationalequityproject.org/wp-content/uploads/Liberatory-Design-CARDS_NEP-Prototype_Feb-2020.pdf.