Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.,Access Denied: Restoring the Nation's Commitment to Equal Educational Opportunity.Washington, D.C.: Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance,2001.
2.
Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.,Empty Promises: The Myth of College Access in America.Washington, D.C.: Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance,2002.
3.
Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.Letter to the Honorable Judd Gregg, Chairman, Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, United States Senate, May 23, 2003.
4.
ArnoneM.“Texas Falls Behind to Enroll More Minority Students.”Chronicle of Higher Education, Jan. 17, 2003, 49(19), 2003.
CarnevaleA. P.“The Demographic Window of Opportunity.” In HellerD. (ed.), Condition of Access: Higher Education for Lower Income Students.Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2002.
7.
College Board.,Trends in College Pricing 2002.Washington, DC: College Board,2002.
8.
DynarskiS. M.“Race, Income, and the Impact of Merit Aid.” In HellerD. E., and MarinP. (eds.), Who Should We Help? The Negative Social Consequences of Merit Scholarships.Cambridge, Mass.: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University, 2002.
9.
Employment Policy Foundation.,Challenges Facing the American Workplace.Washington, D.C.: Employment Policy Foundation,2002.
10.
HellerD.E., and MarinP. (eds.) Who Should We Help? The Negative Social Consequences of Merit Scholarships.Cambridge, Mass.: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University, 2002.
11.
KingT., and BannonE.The Burden of Borrowing: A Report on the Rising Rates of Student Loan Debt.Washington, D.C.: State PIRG's Higher Education Project,2002.
12.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. Losing Ground: A National Status Report on the Affordability of American Higher Education.San Jose, Calif.: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2002.
13.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. U.S. Public Law 107-110. 107th Cong., Jan. 8, 2002.
14.
RussakoffD, and ArgetsingerA.“States Plan Big Tuition Increases.”Washington Post, July 22, 2003, p. 1.
15.
SacksP.“Class Rules: The Fiction of Egalitarian Higher Education.”Chronicle of Higher Education, July 25, 2003, 49(46), p. B7.
16.
St. JohnE. P., Droogsma MusobaG., SimmonsA. B., and ChungC.Meeting the Access Challenge: Indiana's Twenty-First Century Scholars Program.Bloomington: Indiana Education Policy Center,2002.
17.
U.S. Department of Education.,Strategic Plan 2002-2007.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office,2002.
18.
U.S. Department of Education.,2003 Budget Summary.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office,2002.
19.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.,Access to Postsecondary Education for the 1992 High School Graduates. NCES 98-105. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics,1997.
20.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.,Projections of Education Statistics to 2011. NCES 2001-083. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics,2001.
21.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.,Changes in the Net Price of College Attendance: 1992-1993 to 1999-2000.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics,2002.
22.
U.S. General Accounting Office.,Student Aid and Tax Credits: Better Research and Guidance Will Facilitate Comparison and Effectiveness of Student Use. GAO-02-751. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office,2002.