This study examines the complex interplay between language ideologies and oral reading assessments for Black English-speaking students within Reading Recovery, a literacy intervention for first graders. Using a comparative case study, I analyzed the practices of three teachers to explore how they code, interpret, and adapt running record assessments for Black English speakers. Guided by frameworks of language ideologies, raciolinguistic ideologies, and translanguaging, findings reveal that standardized language ideology often leads teachers to misinterpret Black English features as reading deficits. Assimilationist ideologies influenced instructional adaptations, emphasizing remediation and correction of Black English. However, tensions emerged as teachers questioned the validity of standardized assessment practices. This study highlights the need for linguistically responsive teacher preparation and reading assessment reforms to support equitable literacy practices. By positioning Black English speakers as multilingual learners, it calls for reimagining oral reading assessments to frame Black English as a resource for Black students’ reading development.
Ascenzi-MorenoL. (2018). Translanguaging and responsive assessment adaptations. Language Arts, 95(6), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201829683
2.
Ascenzi-MorenoL.GarcíaO.LópezA. A. (2023). Latinx bilingual students’ translanguaging and assessment: A unitary approach. In Melo-PfeiferS.OllivierC. (Eds.), Assessment of plurilingual competence and plurilingual learners in educational settings (pp. 48–61). Routledge.
3.
Ascenzi-MorenoL.SeltzerK. (2021). Always at the bottom: Ideologies in assessment of emergent bilinguals. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(4), 468–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211052255
4.
Baker-BellA. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Taylor & Francis.
BartlettL.VavrusF. (2016). Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. Routledge.
7.
BauerE. B.ColomerS. E.WiemeltJ. (2020). Biliteracy of African American and Latinx kindergarten students in a dual-language program: Understanding students’ translanguaging practices across informal assessments. Urban Education, 55(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918789743
8.
BaughJ. (1999). Out of the mouths of slaves: African American language and educational malpractice. University of Texas Press.
BishopR. S. (1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives: Choosing and Using Books for the Classroom, 6(3), ix–xi.
11.
BoutteG. S.JohnsonG. L. (2013). Funga Alafia: Toward welcoming, understanding, and respecting African American speakers’ bilingualism and biliteracy. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.806850
12.
Charity HudleyA. H.MallinsonC. (2011). Understanding English language variation in U.S. schools. Teachers College Press.
ClayM. M. (2019). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (4th ed.). Heinemann.
15.
Compton-LillyC. (2005). Nuances of error: Considerations relevant to African American vernacular English and learning to read. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 43–58.
16.
Compton-LillyC.MitraA.GuayM.SpenceL. (2020). A confluence of complexity: Intersections among reading theory, neuroscience, and observations of young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S185–S195. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.348
17.
CraigH. K.KolenicG. E.HenselS. L. (2014). African American English-speaking students: A longitudinal examination of style shifting from kindergarten through second grade. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(4), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0157)
do AmaralM. P. (2022). Comparative case studies: Methodological discussion. In BenassoS.BouilletD.NevesT.Parreira do AmaralM. (Eds.), Landscapes of lifelong learning policies across Europe, Palgrave studies in adult education and lifelong learning (pp. 41–60). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96454-2_3
20.
EspinosaC. M.Ascenzi-MorenoL. (2021). Rooted in strength: Using translanguaging to grow multilingual readers and writers. Scholastic.
21.
FloresN.RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
FountasI. C.PinnellG. S. (2022). Benchmark assessment system 1 (3rd ed.). Heinemann.
24.
FriesonB. L.ScaliseM. (2021). Linguistic artistry and flexibility in dual-language bilingual classrooms: Young Black children’s language and literacy practices. Bilingual Research Journal, 44(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2021.1942323
25.
GarcíaO.KleifgenJ. A. (2020). Translanguaging and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.286
26.
GillettE.EllingsonS. P. (2017). How will I know what my students need? Preparing preservice teachers to use running records to make instructional decisions. The Reading Teacher, 71(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1609
27.
GodleyA. J.CarpenterB. D.WernerC. A. (2007). I’ll speak in proper slang”: Language ideologies in a daily editing activity. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 100–131. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.1.4
28.
IrvineJ. T.GalS. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In KroskrityP. V. (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (pp. 35–84). School of American Research Press.
29.
LabovW. (1966). Some sources of reading problems. In FrazierA. (Ed.), New directions in elementary English (pp. 140–167). National Council of Teachers of English.
30.
LabovW. (2003). When ordinary children fail to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 128–131. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/4151696
LeslieL.CaldwellJ. S. (2021). Qualitative reading inventory (7th ed.). Pearson.
33.
LiW.GarcíaO. (2022). Not a first language but one repertoire: Translanguaging as a decolonizing project. RELC Journal, 53(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221092841
34.
Lippi-GreenR. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
35.
McBee OrzulakM. J. (2015). Disinviting deficit ideologies: Beyond “that’s standard,” “that’s racist,” and “that’s your mother tongue”. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 176–198. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201527601
MetzM. (2018). Challenges of confronting dominant language ideologies in the high school English classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 52(4), 455–477.
38.
MilroyJ. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
41.
PeercyM. M.Hardy-SkeberdisM.CrawfordJ. (2024). “Because we bilingual”: Examining an early career ESOL teacher’s humanizing approach to language use. Linguistics and Education, 83, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101337
42.
PonzioC. M. (2020). (Re)imagining a translingual self: Shifting one monolingual teacher candidate’s language lens. Linguistics and Education, 60, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100866
RazfarA.RumenappJ. C.TorresZ. (2023). Administrating language: The language ideological voices of urban school administrators in urban education. Urban Education, 58(10), 2462–2490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920959136
45.
RickfordJ. R. (1999). African American vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Wiley-Blackwell.
46.
RodgersE.D’AgostinoJ. V.KellyR. H.MikitaC. (2018). Oral reading accuracy: Findings and implications from recent research. The Reading Teacher, 72(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1686
47.
RosaJ.BurdickC. (2017). Language ideologies. In GarcíaO.FloresN.SpottiM. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 103–123). Oxford University Press.
48.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
49.
ScanlanM.PalmerD. (2009). Race, power, and (in)equity within two-way immersion settings. The Urban Review, 41(5), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0111-0
50.
SmithermanG. (1986). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Wayne State University Press.
51.
StoufferJ. (2021). Seeking middle ground: Analyzing running records from the top and bottom. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2012
52.
TerryN. P.ConnorC. M.JohnsonL. S.StuckeyA.TaniN. (2016). Dialect variation, dialect-shifting, and reading comprehension in second grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(2), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9593-9
53.
WashingtonJ. A.Branum-MartinL.SunC.Lee-JamesR. (2018). The impact of dialect density on the growth of language and reading in African American children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0063
54.
WashingtonJ. A.SeidenbergM. S. (2021). Teaching reading to African American children: When home and school language differ. American Educator, 45(2), 26–33.
55.
WassinkA. B.CurzanA. (2004). Addressing ideologies around African American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204268229
56.
WayA. K.ZwierR. K.TracyS. J. (2015). Dialogic interviewing and flickers of transformation: An examination and delineation of interactional strategies that promote participant self-reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(8), 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414566686
57.
WeaverM. M. (2019). “I still think there’s a need for proper, academic, Standard English”: Examining a teacher’s negotiation of multiple language ideologies. Linguistics and Education, 49, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.12.005
WheelerR.CartwrightK. B.SwordsR. (2012). Factoring AAVE into reading assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 65(6), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01063
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
