The purpose of this study was to understand the nature of writing instruction across time and grade bands. We used quantitative and qualitative analyses of teacher interviews and video records of classroom instruction of English language arts writing instruction in 97 fourth- through eighth-grade classrooms in 2010 and 2018. Video records showed a decline in writing instruction across time and grade bands. Teacher lessons focused on the first five Common Core Writing Standards with little attention to the latter five. The lessons included aspects of a writing process approach that used instructional scaffolding, models, student practice, and teacher feedback. Lessons were less likely to include the use of authentic texts, text analysis, and student discussion. Teacher interviews pointed to curricular constraints, a view of writing as peripheral, and comfort with teaching writing as hindrances to quality writing instruction. These findings demonstrate a need for curricular and instructional resources to support teachers in offering consistently quality writing instruction.
AlstonC. L. (2012). Examining instructional practices, intellectual challenge, and supports for African American student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(2), 112–144. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201221824
2.
AlstonC. L.BrownM. T. (2015). Differences in intellectual challenge of writing tasks among higher and lower value-added English language arts teachers. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 117(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700504
3.
AlstonC. L.Monte-SanoC.SchleppegrellM. J.HarnK. (2021). Teaching models of disciplinary argumentation in middle school social studies: A framework for supporting writing development. Journal of Writing Research, 13(2), 285–321. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.02.04
4.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201116413
5.
AuW. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
6.
BenkoS. L. (2012). Scaffolding: An ongoing process to support adolescent writing development. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00142
7.
BenkoS. L. (2016). Instruction matters: Secondary English preservice teachers’ implementation of cognitively demanding writing tasks. English Education, 48(3), 201–236. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee201628483
8.
BenkoS. L.HodgeE. M.SalloumS. J. (2020). Policy into practice: Understanding state writing resources. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(2), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20915538
9.
Bifuh-AmbeE. (2013). Developing successful writing teachers: Outcomes of professional development exploring teachers’ perceptions of themselves as writers and writing teachers and their students’ attitudes and abilities to write across the curriculum. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 12(3), 137–156. http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2013v12n3art8.pdf
10.
CarilloE. C. (2016). Reimagining the role of the reader in the common core state standards. The English Journal, 105(3), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201627675
CohenD. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737012003311
13.
Darling-HammondL.HylerM. E.GardnerM. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.SchutzP. A. (2017). Mixed methods designs: Frameworks for organizing your research methods. In Developing a mixed methods proposal: A practical guide for beginning researchers (pp. 83–106). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399980
16.
FormanE. A.CazdenC. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskyian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In WertschJ. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskyian perspectives (pp. 323–347). Cambridge University Press.
17.
GallagherK. (2011). Write like this: Teaching real-world writing through modeling & mentor texts. Stenhouse Publishers.
18.
GallavanN. P.BowlesF. A.YoungC. T. (2007). Learning to write and writing to learn: Insights from teacher candidates. Action in Teacher Education, 29(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2007.10463449
19.
GilbertJ.GrahamS. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 494–517. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193
GrahamS. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). Guilford.
22.
GrossmanP.CohenJ.BrownL. (2015). Understanding instructional quality in English language arts: Variations in PLATO scores by content and context. In KaneT.KerrK.PiantaR. (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of effective teaching project (pp. 303–331). Jossey-Bass.
23.
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD.RonfeldtM.ShahanE.WilliamsonP. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 111(9), 2055–2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
24.
GrossmanP.LoebS.CohenJ.WyckoffJ. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1086/669901
25.
GrossmanP. L.SmagorinskyP.ValenciaS. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/444230
26.
GrossmanP.ValenciaS. W.EvansK.ThompsonC.MartinS.PlaceN. (2000). Transitions into teaching: Learning to teach writing in teacher education and beyond. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(4), 631–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960009548098
27.
HillocksG. (1995). Teaching Writing as Reflective Process. Teachers College Press.
28.
HillocksG. (2011). Commentary on “research in secondary English, 1912–2011: Historical continuities and discontinuities in the NCTE imprint.”. Research in the Teaching of English, 46(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201118265
29.
HodgeE. M.BenkoS. L.SalloumS. J. (2020). Tracing states’ messages about common core instruction: An analysis of English/language arts and close Reading resources. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 122(3), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200303
KennedyM. M. (1988). Learning to teach writing: Does teacher education make a difference?Teachers College Press.
32.
LangerJ. A. (2000). Excellence in English in middle and high school: How teachers’ professional lives support student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 397–439. https://doi-org.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/10.3102/00028312037002397
33.
LangerJ. A. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 837–880. https://doi-org.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/10.3102/00028312038004837
34.
McCartheyS. J.WoodardR.KangG. (2014). Elementary teachers negotiating discourses in writing instruction. Written Communication, 31(1), 58–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313510888
35.
McCarthyS. (2008). The impact of no child left behind on teachers’ writing instruction. Written Communication, 25(4), 462–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308322554
36.
MihalyK.McCaffreyD. F. (2014). Grade level variation in observational measures of teacher effectiveness. In KaneT.KerrK.PiantaR. (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of effective teaching project (pp. 9–49). Jossey-Bass.
37.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.
38.
MuhammadG. E. (2018). A plea for identity and criticality: Reframing literacy learning standards through a four-layered equity model. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.869
39.
MurrayD. (1985). The essential delay: When writer's block isn't. In RoseM. (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing-process problems (pp. 219–226). Guilford Press.
40.
NystrandM. (1997). Dialogic instruction: When recitation becomes conversation. In NystrandM.GamoranA.KachurR.PrendergastC. (Eds.), Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom (pp. 1–29). Teachers College Press.
41.
NystrandM.GamoranA. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199115462
42.
PasternakD. L.CaughlanS.HallmanH. L.RenziL.RushL. S. (2017). Secondary English teacher education in the United States. Bloomsbury.
43.
PenuelW. R.PhillipsR. S.HarrisC. J. (2014). Analysing teachers’ curriculum implementation from integrity and actor-oriented perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(6), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.921841
44.
PhilippakosZ. A. (2020). A yearlong, professional development model on genre-based strategy instruction on writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1767531
45.
PhilippakosZ. A.MooreN. (2017). The literacy coach’s role in supporting teachers’ implementation of the common core state standards in writing. In LawrenceS. (Ed.), Literacy program evaluation and development initiatives for P-12 teaching (pp. 114–137). IGI-Global.
46.
RootR. L.SteinbergM. (1996). Those who do, can: Teachers writing, writers teaching. A sourcebook. NCTE.
47.
SchunkD. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for Reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308219
48.
SperlingM.FreedmanS. W. (2001). Research on writing. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching ((4th ed, pp. 370–389). American Educational Research Association.
49.
StillmanJ.AndersonL. (2011). To follow, reject, or flip the script: Managing instructional tension in an era of high-stakes accountability. Language Arts, 89(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201117155
50.
TaylorB. M.PearsonP. D.PetersonD. S.RodriguezM. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/499740
51.
TroiaG. A.GrahamS. (2016). Common core writing and language standards and aligned state assessments: A national survey of teacher beliefs and attitudes. Reading and Writing, 29(9), 1719–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9650-z
VygotskyL. S. (1986). Thought in language. MIT Press.
54.
WoodardR.KlineS. (2016). Lessons from sociocultural writing research for implementing the common core state standards. The Reading Teacher, 70(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1505
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
