Political conflict between environmental advocates and polluting industries is easily under-stood. However, workers may also be affected by environmental measures leading to the involvement of unions in environmental policy debates. The impact of environmental policy on the status of workers varies a great deal and the position that unions take on environmental issues also shows significant variability. How unions will relate to environmental organizations and whether cooperation or conflict will develop between them requires examination. In this article, the case of the Wisconsin Labor-Environmental Network, a political coalition of unions and environmentalists, is used to examine the outcome of labor-environmental interactions around a range of issues. Utilizing class and social movement theory to inform the analysis, a typology of strategic outcomes is created that encompasses the range of possible results. These include (a) instrumental cooperation, (b) enlightened cooperation, (c) compromise cooperation, and (d) cases of irreconcilable differences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) . (1981, March). The people’s lobby: An AFL-CIO report on the 96th Congress. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Bacharach, S. L. , & Lawler, E. (1980). Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Berry, J. (1984). The interest group society. Boston: Little, Brown.
4.
Broder, D. (1978). Introduction. In S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Emerging coalitions in American politics (pp. 3-11). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
5.
Buchanan, M. , & Scoppettuolo, G. (1997). Environment for cooperation: Building workercommunity coalitions. In C. Levenstein & J. Wooding (Eds.), Work, health and environment (pp. 329-351). New York: Guilford.
6.
Buttel, F. , Geisler, C., & Wiswall, I. (1984). Labor and the environment. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
7.
Cooper, M. (1992). Jobs vs. the environment. CQ Researcher, 2(18), 411-431.
8.
Cotgrove, S. , & Duff, A. (1980). Environmentalism, middle class radicalism and politics. The Sociological Review, 18, 333-351.
9.
Downey, G. (1986). Ideology and the clamshell identity: Organizational dilemmas in the anti-nuclear power movement. Social Problems, 33, 357-373.
10.
Dreiling, M. (1997). Remapping North American environmentalism: Contending visions and divergent practices in the fight over NAFTA. Capitalism, Nature and Socialism, 8(4), 65-98.
11.
Dunk, T. (1994). Talking about trees: Environment and society in forest workers’ culture. Canadian Review of Anthropology and Sociology, 31(1), 14-34.
12.
Dunlap, R. (1991). Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues. Society and Natural Resources, 4, 285-312.
Foster, J. B. (1993, March). The limits of environmentalism without class: Lessons from the ancient forest struggle of the Pacific Northwest. Capitalism, Nature and Socialism, 4(1), 1-41.
15.
Freudenberg, W. , Wilson, L., & O’Leary, D. (1998). Forty years of spotted owls? A longitudinal analysis of logging industry job losses. Sociological Perspectives, 41, 1-26.
16.
Gottlieb, R. (1993). Forcing the spring. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17.
Gouldner, A. (1979). The future of intellectuals and the rise of the new class. New York: Seabury.
18.
Gray, J. S. (1995). Jobs and the environment. In J. Echeverria & R. B. Eby (Eds.), Let the people judge (pp. 191-201). Washington, DC: Island Press.
19.
Grossman, R. (1985). Environmentalists and the labor movement. Socialist Review, 82, 63-87.
20.
Hornor, E. (Ed.). (1996). The almanac of the fifty states. Palo Alto, CA: Information Publications.
21.
Jenkins-Smith, H. , & Sabatier, P. (1994). Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Public Policy, 14, 175-203.
22.
Jobs vs. the environment conflict addressed . (1993, January/February). OCAW Reporter, p. 19.
23.
Judge, D. (1995). The wise use threat to American workers. In J. Echeverria & R. B. Eby (Eds.), Let the people judge (pp. 202-207). Washington, DC: Island Press.
24.
Kazis, R. , & Grossman, R. (1983). The environmental movement and jobs. Social Policy, 13(4), 35-38.
25.
Kazis, R. , & Grossman, R. (1991). Fear at work. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
26.
Keller, B. (1982, January 23). Coalitions and associations transform strategy, methods of lobbying in Washington. Congressional Quarterly, pp. 119-123.
27.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social psychological explanations of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583-600.
28.
Kriz, M. (1994, December 3). The conquered coalition. National Journal, pp. 2824-2829.
29.
Landers, R. (1989, November 17). America turns to recycling. Editorial Research Reports, 2(19), 650-663.
30.
Larsen, D. (1995). Building broad-based coalitions to oppose takings legislation. In J. Echeverrria & R. B. Eby (Eds.), Let the people judge (pp. 304-312). Washington, DC: Island Press.
31.
Logan, R. , & Nelkin, D. (1980). Labor and nuclear power. Environment, 22(2), 6-34.
32.
Loomis, B. (1986). Coalitions of interests: Building bridges in the balkanized state. In A. Cigler & B. Loomer (Eds.), Interest group politics (2nd ed., pp. 258-274). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33.
McCarthey, J. , & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1242.
34.
McClure, L. (1992). Meet the labor movement. Environmental Action, 24(1), 14-23.
35.
Melucci, A. (1980). The new social movements: A theoretical approach. Social Science Information, 19, 199-226.
36.
Melville, M. (1981). The worker’s right to know. Environment, 23(9), 42-45.
37.
Meyer, S. (1992). Environmentalism and economic prosperity: Testing the environmental impact hypothesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Project on Environmental Politics and Policy.
38.
Meyer, S. (1993). Environmentalism and economic prosperity: An update. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Project on Environmental Politics and Policy.
39.
Miller, A. (1980). Towards an environmental/labor coalition. Environment, 22(5), 32-39.
40.
Miller, R. (1991). Superfund for workers is a workable strategy. Texas AFL-CIO Labor News, 37(7), 2-5.
41.
Moe, T. M. (1980). The organization of interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Murphy, R. (1994). Rationality and nature. Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
Offe, C. (1987). Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics: Social movements since the 1960s. In C. Maire (Ed.), Changing boundaries of the political. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (OECD) . (1997). Environmental policies and employment. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and social democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Ramos, T. (1995). Wise use in the West: The case of the Northwest timber industry. In J. Echeverria & R. Booth (Eds.), Let the people judge (pp. 82-118). Washington, DC: Island.
47.
Robinson, G. (1980). Organizing against workplace pollution. Environmental Action, 12(3), 4-10.
48.
Rose, F. (1997). Toward a class-cultural theory of social movements: Reinterpreting new social movements. Sociological Forum, 12, 461-494.
49.
Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129-168.
50.
Sabatier, P. , & McLaughlin, S. (1990). Belief congruence between interest-group leaders and members: An empirical analysis of three theories and a suggested synthesis. Journal of Politics, 52(3), 914-935.
51.
Salisbury, R. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13, 1-32.
52.
Salisbury, R. (1990). The paradox of interest groups in Washington: More groups, less clout. In A. King (Ed.), The New American political system (pp. 203-230). Washington, DC: AEI.
53.
Schermerhorn, J. R. (1979). Interorganizational development. Journal of Management, 5(1), 21-38.
54.
Schlozman, K. L. , & Tierney, J. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
55.
Sink, D. (1991). Transorganizational development in urban policy coalitions. Human Relations, 44, 1179-1195.
56.
Snow, D. , Rochford, B., Worden. S., & Benford, R. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
57.
Truax, H. (1992). Workers and environmental protection. Environmental Action, 24(1), 11-13.
58.
United States Bureau of the Census . (1991). Statistical abstracts of the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
59.
United States Department of Labor . (1995). Report on the American workforce. Washington, DC: Author.
60.
Walker, J. L. (1983). The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. The American Political Science Review, 77, 390-406.
61.
Wildavsky, B. (1991, January/February). Strange bedfellows in public policy. American Enterprise, pp. 14-16.
62.
Wilson, G. (1993). American interest groups. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Pressure groups (pp. 131-145). New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Wright, E. O. (1976). Class boundaries in advanced capitalist societies. NewLeft Review, 98, 3-41.
64.
Yandle, B. (1985). Unions and environmental regulation. Journal of Labor Research, 6, 429-436.
65.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
