The management of nuclear power plants is a topic of considerable practical and theoretical importance. The purpose of this article is to describe a "best practice" identified at Japanese nuclear power plants and to examine the constraints on the transplantation of this practice from Japan to the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barkenbus, J. (1987). Nuclear power safety and the role of international organization. International Organization, 41, 475-490.
2.
DiBella, A.J. (1993). Electricite de France's performance feedback system at work: The case of the "Piquage" (Working Paper No. WP3532-93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
3.
Ettemeyer, A. (1993). New techniques for nondestructive testing of piping systems in nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engineering and Design , 139, 183-185.
4.
Feinstein, J. (1989). The safety regulation of U.S. nuclear power plants: Violations, inspections, and abnormal occurrences. Journal of Political Economy, 97,115-154.
5.
Huttner, K., & Suzuki, T. (1987). Japan. In P.M.S. Jones (Ed.), Nuclear power: Policy and prospects (pp. 251-272). New York: Wiley.
6.
Jaliff, J.O. (1991). Organization and management characteristics of a nuclear power plant. Master's thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management.
7.
Lal, B. ( 1992). A framework for incorporating best practices at nuclear power plants. Master's thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management .
8.
LaPorte, T., & Consolini, P. (1991). Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of "high-reliability" organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 19-47.
9.
Lester, R.K., & McCabe, M.J. (1990). The effect of industrial structure on learning by doing in nuclear power plant operation. MIT working paper, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
10.
Marcus, A., Nichols, M., Bromiley, P., Olson, J., Osborn, R.N., Scott, W., Pelto, P., & Thurber, J. (1989). Management, organization and safety in nuclear power plants (Draft Report NUREG/CR-5437. Washington, DC : Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
11.
Ministry of International Trade and Industry. ( 1991). Genshiryoku hatsudensho untenkanri nenpo [Nuclear power plant operations annual report]. Tokyo: Author.
12.
Moray, N. P., & Huey, B. M. (Eds.). (1988). Human factors research and nuclear safety. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13.
Morone, J.G., & Woodhouse, E.J. (1986). Averting catastrophe: Strategies for regulating risky technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Morone, J., & Woodhouse, E. (1989). The demise of nuclear energy? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Nichols, M., Marcus, A., Olson, J., Osborn, R.N., & Thurber, J. (1991). Organizational factors influencing improvements in nuclear power plants (Draft Report NUREG/ CR-5705. Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
16.
Nicoll, R. (1991). Establishment of radiation protection boundaries for nuclear power plants. Health Physics, 60, 725-731.
17.
Olson, J., McLaughlin, S.D., Osborn, R.N., & Jackson, D.H. (1984). An initial empirical analysis of nuclear power plant organization and its effect on safety performance (NUREG/CR-3939. Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
18.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency. (1992). Nuclear power economics and technology: An overview. Paris: OECD.
19.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents. New York : Basic Books.
20.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Roberts, K. (1990). Some characteristics of high reliability organizations . Organization Science, 1, 1-17.
22.
Roth, G. (1991). Managing structural tensions in maintaining a high-reliability organization: The study of "River Point" Nuclear Power Plant Working paper, MIT, International Program for Enhanced Nuclear Power Plant Safety.
23.
Samuels, R.J. (1987). The business of the Japanese state: Energy markets in comparative and historical perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
Schulman, P.R. (1990, September). Reliability through fluctuation: Negotiating order in a nuclear power plant. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
25.
Shrivastava, P. (1987). Bhopal: Anatomy of a crisis. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Shrivastava, P. (1991, August). Organizational sources of environmental crises: Lessons from Exxon Valdez and Bhopal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association , Cincinnati, OH.
27.
Shrivastava, P., Mitroff, I.I., Miller, D., & Miglani, A. (1988). Understanding industrial crises. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 285-303.
28.
Suzuki, T., & Hansen, K. (1988). A comparison of nuclear safety regulation systems and their impacts on LWR performance in Japan and the United States (Working Paper No. MIT-EL 88-019WP. Cambridge: MIT.
29.
Vaughan, D. (1990). Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the space shuttle Challenger. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 35, 225-257.
30.
Wechsler, M. (1989). Radiation embrittlement in the pressure-vessels steels of nuclear power plants. Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 41, 7-14.
