A framework is proposed for a constructive political sociology of risk, and the framework is used to evaluate whether the commercialization of biotechnology is proceeding via strategies likely to cope satisfactorily with unintended con sequences, organizational inertia, socioeconomic risks and other social aspects of biotechnological innovations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T., 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2.
Browne, W.P. and Hamm, L.G., 1988. Political choice and social values: the case ofbGH. Policy Studies Journal, 17: 181-192.
3.
Busch, L., Lacy, W.B., Burkhardt, J. and Lacy, L.R., 1991. Plants, Power, and Profit: Social, Economic and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies. Blackwell, New York.
4.
Buttel, F.H., et al., 1985. From Green Revolution to Biorevolution: some observations on the changing technological bases of economic transformation in the Third World. Economic Development and Cultural Change , 34: 61-91.
5.
Collingridge, D., 1980. The Social Control of Technology. St. Martin's, New York.
6.
Collingridge, D., 1983. Technology in the Policy Process: the Control of Nuclear Power. St. Martin's, New York.
7.
Drucker, D.F., 1973. New technology: predicting its impact. New York Times, 8 April. Reprinted in: A.H. Teich, ed. Technology and the Future, 4th ed. St. Martin's, New York: 214-218.
8.
Erikson, K.T., 1976. Everything In Its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. Simon & Schuster, New York.
9.
Flavell, R.B. et al., 1986. Plants and Agriculture. In: S. Silver, ed. Biotechnology: Potentials and Limitations. Springer, New York : 199-221.
10.
Hanson, B. and Nelkin, D., 1989. Public responses to genetic engineering. Society, November/ December: 71-77.
11.
Harlow, R.E., 1986. The EPA and biotechnology regulation: coping with scientific uncertainty. The Yale Law Journal, 95: 553-576.
12.
Hughes, T.P., 1983. Networks of Power. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD.
13.
Kalter, R.J., 1985. The new biotech agriculture: unforeseen economic consequences . Issues in Science and Technology, Fall: 125-133.
14.
Kenney, M. and Buttel, F.H., 1985. Biotechnology: prospects and dilemmas for Third World development. Development and Change, 16: 70-89.
15.
Klausner, A., 1985. Food from the sea. Bio/Technology , January: 26-32.
16.
Kloppenburg, J., Jr. , 1984. The social impacts of biogenetic technology in agriculture: past and future. In: G. Berardi and C. Geisler, eds. The Social Consequences and Challenges of the New Agricultural Technologies . Westview, Boulder, CO: 291-321.
17.
Kloppenburg, J.R., 1988. First the Seed: the Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology . Cambridge University Press, London .
18.
Krimsky, S., 1982. Genetic Alchemy: the Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19.
Levin, S.A. and Harwell, M.A., 1985. Environmental risks and genetically engineered organisms . In: S. Panem, ed. Biotechnology: Implications for Public Policy. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
20.
Lindblom, C.E., 1959. The science of "muddling through". Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88.
21.
Lindblom, C.E., 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy. Free Press, New York.
22.
McGarity, T.O., 1985. Regulating biotechnology. Issues in Science and Technology, 1(3): 40-56.
23.
Merton, R.S., 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, Chicago, IL.
24.
Morone, J. and Woodhouse, E.J., 1986. Averting Catastrophe: Strategies for Regulating Risky Technologies. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
25.
Morone, J. and Woodhouse, E.J., 1989. The Demise of Nuclear Energy? Lessons for Democratic Control of Technology. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
26.
Nelkin, D. and Tancredi, L., 1989. Dangerous Diagnostics: the Social Power of Biological Information. Basic, New York.
27.
Noble, D.F., 1984. Forces of Production: a Social History of Industrial Automation . Knopf, New York.
28.
NRC (National Research Council), 1987. Agricultural Biotechnology: Strategies for National Competitiveness. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
29.
OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy), 1984. Proposal for a coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology. Federal Register, 49, 31 December: 50856-50907.
30.
OTA (Office of Technology Assessment), US Congress, 1988a. US Investment in Biotechnology. OTA , Washington, DC.
31.
OTA (Office of Technology Assessment), US Congress, 1988b. Public Responses to Biotechnology. OTA, Washington, DC.
32.
Pendorff, S., 1985. Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler. Florida State University Law Review, 12: 891-921.
33.
Perrow, C., 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Basic, New York.
34.
Rauch, J., 1987. Drug on the market. National Journal, 4 April: 818-821.
35.
Short, J.F., 1984. The social fabric at risk: toward the social transformation of risk analysis. American Sociological Review, 49: 711-725.
36.
Suzuki, D. and Knudtson, P., 1989. Genethics: the Clash Between the New Genetics and Human Values. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
37.
Tangley, L., 1986. Biotechnology on the farm. BioScience , 36: 590-593.
38.
Vandenbergh, M.P., 1986. The rutabaga that atePittsburgh: federal regulation of free release biotechnology. Virginia Law Review , 72: 1529-1568.
39.
Wheale, P.R. and McNally, R.M., 1988. Genetic Engineering: Catastrophe or Utopia? St. Martin's, New York.
40.
Winner, L., 1977. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a Theme in Political Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41.
Winner, L., 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: the Search for Limits in an Age of High TechnologyUniversity of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
42.
Woodhouse, E.J., 1988. Sophisticated trial-and-error in decision making about risk. In: M.E. Kraft and N.J. Vig, eds. Technology and Politics . Duke University Press, Durham : 200-223.
43.
Wright, S., 1986. Molecular biology or molecular politics? The production of scientific consensus on the hazards of recombinant DNA technology. Social Studies of Science, 16: 593-620.
44.
Yoxen, E., 1984. The Gene Business: Who Should Control Biotechnology. Harper & Row, New York.
45.
Zilinskas, R.A. and Zimmerman, B.K., eds., 1986. The Gene-Splicing Wars: Reflections on the Recombinant DNA Controversy. Macmillan, New York.
