This paper describes a multidisciplinary project concerned with the design and management of hazardous organizations that achieve extremely high lev els of reliable and safe operations. The organizations in which the research is being conducted are the Federal Aviation Administration's Air Traffic Control system, Pacific Gas and Electric Company's electrical distribution system, and two nuclear aircraft carriers of the United States Navy. The paper describes the research strategy and then presents some initial organizational paradoxes and findings. These are discussed in terms of describing the organizations, decision making, interdependence, the "culture" of high reliability and adaptation to technological change. The paper concludes with the admonition that managers in hazardous organizations should consider the cost of safeguards against or ganizational catastrophes versus the costs of catastrophe (in money, lives and public outcry).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R.P. and Levi, A., 1985. Decision-making and decision theory. In: E. Aronson (Editor), Handbook of Social Psychology , Vol. 1 (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
2.
Blau, P.M. and Schoenherr, R.A. , 1971. The Structure of Organizations . Basic Books, New York.
3.
Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W., 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin,56: 81-105.
4.
Cooke, R.A. and Rousseau, D.M., 1988. Behavioral norms and expectations: a quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group and Organizational Studies, 13: 245-273.
5.
Glaser, A.B. and Strauss, A., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, London.
6.
Hage, J. and Aiken, M., 1969. Routine technology, social structure, and organization goals. Administrative Science Quarterly,14: 366-376.
7.
Halpern, J., 1989. Cognitive factors influencing decision making in a highly reliable organization. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 3: 143-158 (this issue).
8.
Hinings, C.R. and Lee, G.L., 1971. Dimensions of organizational structure and their context: a replication. Sociology, 5: 83-93.
9.
La Porte, T.R., 1987. High reliability organizations: the research challenge. Working paper. Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
10.
La Porte, T.R., 1988. High reliability organization project, revision 7. University of California, Berkeley, CA.
11.
March, J.G. and Feldman, M.S., 1981. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly,26: 171-186.
12.
Martin, J., Feldman, M., Sitkin, S. and Hatch, M.J., 1983. The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly,28: 438-453.
13.
Mintzberg, H., 1979. The Structure of Organizations. Prentice-Hall , Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14.
North, D.M., 1987. Military accident rates parallel 1986's low levels. Aviation Week and Space Technology, June 8, 1987.
Pauchant, T.C. and Mitroff, I.I., 1988. Crisis prone versus crisis avoiding organizations: Is your company's culture its own worst enemy in creating crises?Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 2: 53-63.
17.
Perrow, C., 1983. The organization context of human factors engineering . Administrative Science Quarterly,28: 521-541.
18.
Perrow, C., 1984. Normal Accidents. Basic Books, New York.
19.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G., 1978. The External Control of Organizations. Harper & Row, New York.
20.
Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R. and Turner, C., 1968. Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly,13: 65-105.
21.
Roberts, K.H. (in press a). Bishop Rock dead ahead: the grounding of the USS Enterprise . Naval Institute Proceedings.
22.
Roberts, K.H. (in press b). Some characteristics of high reliability organizations . Organizational Science.
23.
Roberts, K.H. and Gargano, G., 1989. Managing a high reliability organization: a case for interdependence . In: M.A. Von Glinow and S. Mohrman (Editors), Managing Complexity in High Technology Organizations: Systems and People. Oxford University Press, New York.
24.
Roberts, K.H. and Rousseau, D.M., 1989. Research in nearly error free, high reliability organizations: having the bubble. IEEE Transactions, 36: 132-139.
25.
Roberts, K.H., Rousseau, D.M., La Porte, T.R. and Cooke, R.A., 1989a. Organization culture in three high reliability organizations . Submitted for publication.
26.
Roberts, K.H., Stout, S. and Halpern, J.J., 1989b. Cognitive and organizational factors influencing decision making in a high reliability organization. Submitted for publication.
27.
Rochlin, G.I., 1985. Ethical and value implications of technological transitions in high reliability organizations. Invited paper, Conference on Engineering Ethics, Los Angeles, CA, May 1985.
28.
Rochlin, G.I., 1986. High reliability organizations and technical change: some ethical problems and dilemmas. IEEE Technology and Society , September: 3-9.
29.
Rochlin, G.I., 1987. High-tech, low-tech, and no-tech: complexity and technology in US Naval flight operations at sea. Paper presented to Section on Military Studies (SOMS), International Studies Association, Atlanta, GA, September 1987.
30.
Rochlin, G.I., 1989. Informal organizational networking as a crisis-avoidance strategy: US naval flight operations as a case study. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 3: 159-176 (this issue).
31.
Rorty, A., 1987. Interdependence and the concept persons. Radcliffe College working paper series No. 1.
32.
Scott, W.R., 1989. Notes on application of organizational theory to high reliability organizations. Personal communication.
33.
Sevinsky, J.A., 1987. Toxic chemical accidents: crises that can be prevented . Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 1: 34-45.
34.
Shrivastava, P., 1987. Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis. Ballinger , Cambridge, MA.
35.
Thompson, J.D., 1967. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill , New York.
36.
Trice, H.M. and Beyer, J.M., 1984. Studying organizational cultures through rites and ceremonials . Academy of Management Review, 9: 653-669.
