Press reporting is instrumental in creating public attitudes towards technological risk and related problems of health, and in shaping the policy agenda. This paper uses examples from the coverage of the health effects of dioxin, to explore some characteristics of risk reporting. It suggests how risk reporting reflects both, the constraints of journalism and the attitudes of scientists and industrial sources of information as they seek to manipulate press coverage of risk through increasingly sophisticated public relations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Friedman, S., Dunwoody, S. and Rogers, C. (eds.), Scientists and journalists. New York: The Free Press, 1986.
2.
Gans, H.Deciding what's news. New York: Random House, 1979.
3.
Nelkin, D.Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1987.
4.
Sachsman, D. "Public relations influence in coverage of environment in the San Francisco area." Journalism Quarterly, 53, Spring 1976, pp. 51-60.
5.
Sandman, P. et al., Providing risk information to the media. New Jersey Institute of Technology, March 1986, unpublished report.
6.
Science Writers, monthly newsletter of the National Association of Science Writers.
7.
SIPIScope, bimonthly newsletter of the Scientists Institute for Public Information.
