Extant theory in corporate sustainability highlights challenges in coordinating organizational action to “fit” the complex functioning of ecological systems. Our qualitative study shows how a certification organization in the U.S. wine industry developed and enacted a “bridging capacity,” through which it tailored program standards to cultivate members’ attention to ecological issues within and across spatial and temporal scales. Drawing on data covering a 25-year period, we uncover three mechanisms associated with this bridging capacity: sourcing, decoding, and converting. We develop a theoretical model showing how a bridging capacity enables a certification organization to develop standards that reflect and respond to the complexity of the ecological systems in which its members operate. While certification programs have been important for signaling a commitment to sustainability to stakeholders, our work adds that by developing a bridging capacity, such programs can add further value by supporting coordinated, system approaches to corporate sustainability.
AravindD.ChristmannP. (2011). Decoupling of standard implementation from certification: Does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental performance?Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 73–102.
BansalP.KimA.WoodM. O. (2018). Hidden in plain sight: The importance of scale in organizations’ attention to issues. Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 217–241.
4.
BansalP.SongH. C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149.
5.
BoiralO.GendronY. (2011). Sustainable development and certification practices: Lessons learned and prospects. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(5), 331–347.
6.
BottrellD. G.SchoenlyK. G. (2018). Integrated pest management for resource-limited farmers: challenges for achieving ecological, social and economic sustainability. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 156(3), 408–426.
7.
BouslahK.M’ZaliB.TurcotteM. F.KooliM. (2010). The impact of forest certification on firm financial performance in Canada and the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 551–572.
8.
BowenF. E.BansalP.SlawinskiN. (2018). Scale matters: The scale of environmental issues in corporate collective actions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1411–1436.
9.
CarlosW. C.LewisB. W. (2018). Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 130–169.
10.
CashD. W.AdgerW. N.BerkesF.GardenP.LebelL.OlssonP.PritchardL.YoungO. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/
11.
ChatterjeeA.GhoshA.LecaB. (2022). Double weaving: A bottom-up process of connecting locations and scales to mitigate grand challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 66(3), 797–828.
12.
DarnallN.JiH.Vázquez-BrustD. A. (2018). Third-party certification, sponsorship, and consumers’ ecolabel use. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 953–969.
13.
DittrichK. (2022). Scale in research on grand challenges. In GümüsayA. A.MartiE.Trittin-UlbrichH.WickertC. (Eds.), Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges (pp. 187–204). Emerald Publishing Limited.
14.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E.SonensheinS. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123.
15.
ErgeneS.BanerjeeS. B.HoffmanA. J. (2021). (Un) sustainability and organization studies: Towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies, 42(8), 1319–1335.
16.
GehmanJ.GrimesM. (2017). Hidden badge of honor: How contextual distinctiveness affects category promotion among certified B corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2294–2320.
17.
GehmanJ.GrimesM. G.CaoK. (2019). Why we care about certified B corporations: From valuing growth to certifying values practices. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(1), 97–101.
18.
GibsonC. C.OstromE.AhnT. K. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 217–239.
19.
GiffordR. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290.
20.
GilbertD. U.RascheA.WaddockS. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 23–44.
21.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
22.
GosseltJ. F.van RompayT.HaskeL. (2019). Won’t get fooled again: The effects of internal and external CSR ECO-labeling. Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 413–424.
23.
GrewatschS.KennedyS.BansalP. (2023). Tackling wicked problems in strategic management with systems thinking. Strategic Organization, 21(3), 721–732.
24.
GrimesM. G.GehmanJ.CaoK. (2018). Positively deviant: Identity work through B Corporation certification. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 130–148.
25.
GümüsayA. A.MartiE.Trittin-UlbrichH.WickertC. (2022). Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges. Emerald Publishing.
26.
Heras-SaizarbitoriaI.BoiralO.DíazdeJunguituA. (2020). Environmental management certification and environmental performance: Greening or greenwashing?Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2829–2841.
27.
HoffmanA. J.OcasioW. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12(4), 414–434.
28.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.BuckleS. J.HoskinsB. J.GeorgeG. (2014). Climate change and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 615–623.
29.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.LahnemanB. (2021). Bringing the biophysical to the fore: re-envisioning organizational adaptation in the era of planetary shifts. Strategic Organization, 19(3), 478–493.
JarzabkowskiP.BednarekR.ChalkiasK.CacciatoriE. (2021). Enabling rapid financial response to disasters: Knotting and reknotting multiple paradoxes in interorganizational systems. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1477–1506.
32.
JellemaS. F.WernerM. D.RascheA.CornelissenJ. (2022). Questioning impact: A cross-disciplinary review of certification standards for sustainability. Business & Society, 61(5), 1042–1082.
33.
KingA. A.LenoxM. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–716.
34.
KingA. A.LenoxM. J.TerlaakA. (2005). The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1091–1106.
35.
KoelschL. E. (2013). Reconceptualizing the member check interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 168–179.
36.
LahnemanB. (2015). In vino veritas: Understanding sustainability with environmental certified management standards. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 160–180.
37.
LahnemanB.WallsJ. L.UnterK. M. M.Howard-GrenvilleJ. (2025). (Re)focusing on planetary boundaries for corporate sustainability research. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270251315632
38.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
39.
LeeB. H. (2009). The infrastructure of collective action and policy content diffusion in the organic food industry. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1247–1269.
40.
LiuteA.De GiacomoM. R. (2022). The environmental performance of UK-based B Corp companies: An analysis based on the triple bottom line approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 810–827.
41.
MairJ.WolfM.SeelosC. (2016). Scaffolding: A process of transforming patterns of inequality in small-scale societies. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2021–2044.
42.
McCarthyB.SchurmannA. (2018). Risky business: Growers’ perceptions of organic and biodynamic farming in the tropics. Rural Society, 27(3), 177–191.
43.
MeadowsD. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
44.
MilkoreitM.HodbodJ.BaggioJ.BenessaiahK.Calderón-ContrerasR.DongesJ. F.& WernersS. E. (2018). Defining tipping points for social-ecological systems scholarship—An interdisciplinary literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3), 033005.
45.
MontgomeryA. W.LyonT. P.BargJ. (2024). No end in sight? A greenwash review and research agenda. Organization & Environment, 37(2), 221–256.
46.
NyilasyG.GangadharbatlaH.PaladinoA. (2014). Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 693–707.
47.
OcasioW. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Suppl. 1), 187–206.
48.
O’MahonyS.BechkyB. A. (2008). Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 422–459.
49.
PaelmanV.Van CauwenbergeP.Vander BauwhedeH. (2020). Effect of B Corp certification on short-term growth: European evidence. Sustainability, 12(20), 8459.
50.
ReineckeJ.ManningS.von HagenO. (2012). The Emergence of a Standards Market: Multiplicity of Sustainability Standards in the Global Coffee Industry. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 791–814.
RobinsonJ.HardingJ. (2015). The Oxford Companion to Wine (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
53.
RobustiE. A.MazetoV. A.VenturaM. U.JúniorD. S.de Oliveira MenezesA. (2020). Soybean crop profitability: Biodynamic vs conventional farming in a 7-yr case study in Brazil. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 35(3), 336–341.
54.
RockströmJ.SteffenW.NooneK.PerssonÅ.ChapinF. S.LambinE. F.LentonT. M.FoleyJ. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.
55.
SchadJ.BansalP. (2018). Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspective informs paradox research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1490–1506.
56.
SlawinskiN.BansalP. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26(2), 531–549.
57.
TashmanP.RiveraJ. (2016). Ecological uncertainty, adaptation, and mitigation in the US ski resort industry: Managing resource dependence and institutional pressures. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1507–1525.
58.
TerlaakA. (2007). Order without law? The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 968–985.
VillelaM.BulgacovS.MorganG. (2021). B Corp certification and its impact on organizations over time. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 343–357.
61.
WangJ.MaoY. (2020). Pains and gains of environmental management system certification for the sustainable development of manufacturing companies: Heterogeneous effects of industry peer learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 2092–2109.
WhitemanG.WalkerB.PeregoP. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.
64.
WilliamsA.WhitemanG.KennedyS. (2021). Cross-scale systemic resilience: Implications for organization studies. Business and Society, 60(1), 95–124.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
