In this paper, we conceptualize circular economy ecosystem emergence as the intersection of extant innovation, entrepreneurial, and industrial ecosystems. From our rich qualitative data in the circular textiles and apparel industry, we identify drivers behind emergence and uncover the pivotal role ecosystem orchestrators play in governing the interdependencies between actors and activities across the different intersecting ecosystems. From our findings, we theorize circular economy ecosystem emergence as a transitional phase or “real utopia” that, with purposeful orchestration, can potentially become a future desired state. In doing so, we make novel contributions to the literature on economic ecosystems, circular economy, and prospective theorizing, a nascent future-oriented perspective on theory building. Our research offers valuable insights for practitioners and policymakers aiming to accelerate circular economy transformation.
Aarikka-StenroosL.RitalaP.ThomasL. D. (2021). Circular economy ecosystems: A typology, definitions, and implications. In TeerikangasS.OnkilaT.KoistinenK.MäkeläM. (Eds.), Research handbook of sustainability agency (pp. 260–276). Edward Elgar Publishing
2.
AdnerR. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.
3.
AdnerR. (2021). Winning the right game: How to disrupt, defend, and deliver in a changing world. MIT Press.
4.
AndreoniA. (2018). The architecture and dynamics of industrial ecosystems: Diversification and innovative industrial renewal in Emilia Romagna. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1613–1642.
5.
AshtonW. S. (2009). The structure, function, and evolution of a regional industrial ecosystem. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 228–246.
6.
AutioE. (2022). Orchestrating ecosystems: A multi-layered framework. Innovation, 24(1), 96–109.
7.
AutioE.ThomasL. D. (2021). Researching ecosystems in innovation contexts. Innovation & Management Review, 19(1), 12–25.
8.
BaldwinC. Y.BogersM. L.KapoorR.WestJ. (2024). Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies. Research Policy, 53(3), 104949.
9.
BansalP.DurandR.KreutzerM.KunischS.McGahanA. M. (2025). Strategy can no longer ignore planetary boundaries: A call for tackling strategy’s ecological fallacy. Journal of Management Studies, 62, 965–985.
10.
BansalP.SmithW. K.VaaraE. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189–1195.
11.
BarrieJ.KandaW. (2020). Building ecologies of circular intermediaries. In BrandãoM.LazarevicD.FinnvedenG. (Eds.), Handbook of the circular economy (pp. 235–249). Edward Elgar Publishing.
12.
BergekA.JacobssonS.CarlssonB.LindmarkS.RickneA. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429.
13.
BlackburnO.RitalaP.KeränenJ. (2023). Digital platforms for the circular economy: Exploring meta-organizational orchestration mechanisms. Organization & Environment, 36(2), 253–281.
14.
BockenN.PinkseJ.DarnallN.RitalaP. (2023). Between circular paralysis and Utopia: Organizational transformations towards the circular economy. Organization & Environment, 36, 378–382.
15.
BohnsackR.RenningsM.BlockC.BröringS. (2024). Profiting from innovation when digital business ecosystems emerge: A control point perspective. Research Policy, 53(3), 104961.
16.
BrydgesT. (2021). Closing the loop on take, make, waste: Investigating circular economy practices in the Swedish fashion industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126245.
17.
BurströmT.LahtiT.ParidaV.WincentJ. (2024). Industrial ecosystems: A systematic review, framework and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, 123656.
18.
CennamoC.SantalóJ. (2019). Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organization Science, 30(3), 617–641.
19.
ChizaryfardA.TruccoP.NuurC. (2021). The transformation to a circular economy: Framing an evolutionary view. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31(2), 475–504.
20.
ClarysseB.WrightM.BruneelJ.MahajanA. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176.
21.
CloutierC.RavasiD. (2021). Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 113–133.
22.
CobbenD.OomsW.RoijakkersN.RadziwonA. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138–164.
23.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
24.
DattéeB.AlexyO.AutioE. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466–498.
25.
DaymondJ.KnightE.RumyantsevaM.MaguireS. (2023). Managing ecosystem emergence and evolution: Strategies for ecosystem architects. Strategic Management Journal, 44(4), O1–O27.
26.
DedehayirO.MäkinenS. J.OrttJ. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18–29.
27.
DiVitoL.LeitheiserE.PillerC. (2023). Circular Moonshot: Understanding shifts in organizational field logics and business model innovation. Organization & Environment, 36(2), 349–377.
28.
DiVitoL.van WijkJ.WakkeeI. (2021). Governing collaborative value creation in the context of grand challenges: A case study of a cross-sectoral collaboration in the textile industry. Business & Society, 60(5), 1092–1131.
29.
EdenC.HuxhamC. (1996). Action research for management research. British Journal of Management, 7(1), 75–86.
30.
EdmondsonA. C.McManusS. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264.
31.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
32.
EisenhardtK. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?Strategic Organization, 19(1), 147–160.
EU Commission. (2022). EU strategy for sustainable and circular textiles. Retrieved March 04, 2025, from Textiles strategy - European Commission
35.
FerrariA. G.JugendD.ArmelliniF.BarbalhoS. C. M.de CarvalhoM. M. (2023). Crossing actors’ boundaries towards circular ecosystems in the organic food sector: Facing the challenges in an emerging economy context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 407, 137093.
36.
FischerB.MeissnerD.VonortasN.GuerreroM. (2022). Spatial features of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 147, 27–36.
37.
FossN. J.SchmidtJ.TeeceD. J. (2023). Ecosystem leadership as a dynamic capability. Long Range Planning, 56(1), 102270.
38.
FroschR. A.GallopoulosN. E. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(3), 144–153.
39.
GehmanJ.GlaserV. L.EisenhardtK. M.GioiaD.LangleyA.CorleyK. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300.
40.
GeissdoerferM.SavagetP.BockenN. M.HultinkE. J. (2017). The circular economy—A new sustainability paradigm?Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.
41.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
42.
GranstrandO.HolgerssonM. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098.
43.
GrimesM. G.VogusT. J. (2021). Inconceivable! Possibilistic thinking and the sociocognitive underpinnings of entrepreneurial responses to grand challenges. Organization Theory, 2(2), 26317877211005780.
44.
GrodalS.AntebyM.HolmA. L. (2021). Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: The role of active categorization in theory building. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 591–612.
45.
GulatiR.PuranamP.TushmanM. (2012). Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571–586.
46.
GümüsayA. A.ReineckeJ. (2024). Imagining desirable futures: A call for prospective theorizing with speculative rigour. Organization Theory, 5(1), 26317877241235939.
47.
HannahD. P.EisenhardtK. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163–3192.
48.
HenryM.BauwensT.HekkertM.KirchherrJ. (2020). A typology of circular start-ups: An Analysis of 128 circular business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118528.
49.
JacobidesM. G.CennamoC.GawerA. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276.
50.
JayJ. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.
51.
KandaW.GeissdoerferM.HjelmO. (2021). From circular business models to circular business ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 306, 2814–2829.
52.
KandaW.KuismaM.KivimaaP.HjelmO. (2020). Conceptualising the systemic activities of intermediaries in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 449–465.
53.
KandaW. (2023). Systems and ecosystems in the circular economy: What’s the difference?Journal of Circular Economy, 1(3), 1–10.
54.
KapoorR.AgarwalS. (2017). Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems. Organization Science, 28(3), 531–551.
55.
KetokiviM.MantereS. (2010). Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 315–333.
56.
KirchherrJ.ReikeD.HekkertM. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.
57.
KlagM.LangleyA. (2013). Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 149–166.
58.
KlofstenM.KandaW.BienkowskaD.BockenN.MianS.LamineW. (2024). Start-ups within entrepreneurial ecosystems: Transition towards circular economy. International Small Business Journal, 02662426241227520.
59.
KonietzkoJ.BockenN.HultinkE. J. (2020). Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119942.
60.
KretschmerT.LeiponenA.SchillingM.VasudevaG. (2022). Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 405–424.
61.
LampelJ.MeyerA. D. (2008). Field-configuring events as structuring mechanisms: How conferences, ceremonies, and trade shows constitute new technologies, industries, and markets guest editors introduction. Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), 1025–1035.
62.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
63.
LangleyA.SmallmanC.TsoukasH.Van de VenA. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.
64.
LiederM.RashidA. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36–51.
65.
LoweE. A.EvansL. K. (1995). Industrial ecology and industrial ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3(1–2), 47–53.
66.
Lüdeke-FreundF.GoldS.BockenN. M. (2019). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 36–61.
67.
McKenzieJ.BartunekJ. (2023). Mirror, mirror outside my wall: Reflexive impacts of insider/outsider collaborative inquiry on the insider researcher. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 59, 714–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231177486
68.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
69.
MooreJ. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
70.
MorrisZ. B.WeissburgM.BrasB. (2021). Ecological network analysis of urban–industrial ecosystems. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(1), 193–204.
71.
MuñozP.DimovD. (2023). Facing the future through entrepreneurship theory: A prospective inquiry framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 38(4), 106303.
72.
MurrayA.SkeneK.HaynesK. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380.
73.
NicoliniD. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418.
74.
NiinimäkiK.PetersG.DahlboH.PerryP.RissanenT.GwiltA. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189–200.
75.
NogueiraL. A.LindeløvB.OlsenJ. (2023). From waste to market: Exploring markets, institutions, and innovation ecosystems for waste valorization. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2261–2274.
76.
ParidaV.BurströmT.VisnjicI.WincentJ. (2019). Orchestrating industrial ecosystem in circular economy: A two-stage transformation model for large manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 101, 715–725.
77.
PatalaS.AlbaredaL.HalmeM. (2022). Polycentric governance of privately owned resources in circular economy systems. Journal of Management Studies, 59(6), 1563–1596.
78.
PetersG.LiM.LenzenM. (2021). The need to decelerate fast fashion in a hot climate-A global sustainability perspective on the garment industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126390.
79.
PettigrewA. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.
80.
PrattM. G.SonensheinS.FeldmanM. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 211–238.
81.
ReypensC.LievensA.BlazevicV. (2021). Hybrid orchestration in multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Practices of mobilizing multiple, diverse stakeholders across organizational boundaries. Organization Studies, 42(1), 61–83.
82.
ScaringellaL.RadziwonA. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59–87.
83.
ShiX.LiangX.LuoY. (2023). Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies. Research Policy, 52(6), 104783.
84.
ShiX.ShiY. (2022). Unpacking the process of resource allocation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Research Policy, 51(9), 104378.
85.
ShipilovA.GawerA. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 92–121.
86.
SmithW. K.TraceyP. (2016). Institutional complexity and paradox theory: Complementarities of competing demands. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 455–466.
87.
SoberónM.Ezquerra-LázaroI.Sánchez-ChaparroT.Moreno-SernaJ.DóciG.KordasO. (2023). Supporting municipalities to develop collaboration capability to facilitate urban transitions and sustainability: Role of transition intermediaries in Madrid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 426, 138964.
88.
SoberónM.Sánchez-ChaparroT.SmithA.Moreno-SernaJ.Oquendo-Di CosolaV.MataixC. (2022). Exploring the possibilities for deliberately cultivating more effective ecologies of intermediation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 44, 125–144.
89.
SottiniA.CiambottiG.LittlewoodD. (2022). Engaging symbiotic ecosystems to build community centred business models for the BoP: Evidence from small social enterprises in East Africa. International Small Business Journal, 40, 02662426211059778.
90.
StamE. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.
91.
StamE.Van de VenA. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 809–832.
92.
SunS. L.ChenV. Z.SunnyS. A.ChenJ. (2019). Venture capital as an innovation ecosystem engineer in an emerging market. International Business Review, 28(5), 101485.
93.
SusurE.HidalgoA.ChiaroniD. (2019). The emergence of regional industrial ecosystem niches: A conceptual framework and a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1642–1657.
94.
ThomasL. D. W.AutioE. (2020). Innovation ecosystems in management: An organizing typology. In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford University Press.
95.
ThomasL. D. W.RitalaP. (2022). Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: A collective action view. Journal of Management, 48(3), 515–541.
96.
van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press.
97.
van HilleI.de BakkerF. G.FergusonJ. E.GroenewegenP. (2019). Navigating tensions in a cross-sector social partnership: How a convener drives change for sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 317–329.
98.
VermeulenW. J. V.BackesC. W.De MunckM. C. J.Campbell-JohnstonK.De WaalI. M.Rosales CarreonJ.BoeveM. N. (2021). Pathways for extended producer responsibility on the road to a circular economy. White paper based on a literature review and the results of a Delphi study, on the experiences with EPR in the Netherlands, Utrecht University, Circular Economy and Society Hub, Utrecht, The Netherlands. https://docslib.org/doc/4824195/white-paper-on-pathways-for-extended-producer-responsibility
99.
WangD.ZhengJ.SongX.MaG.LiuY. (2017). Assessing industrial ecosystem vulnerability in the coal mining area under economic fluctuations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4019–4031.
100.
WickertC.PostC.DohJ. P.PrescottJ. E.PrencipeA. (2021). Management research that makes a difference: Broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 297–320.
101.
WrightE. O. (2013). Transforming capitalism through real utopias. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 1–25.
102.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage.
103.
ZahraS. A.NambisanS. (2011). Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 4–17.
