Aragon-CorreaJ. A.MarcusA. A.VogelD. (2020). The effects of mandatory and voluntary regulatory pressures on firms’ environmental strategies: A review and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 339-365. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0014
EtzionD.GehmanJ.FerraroF.AvidanM. (2017). Unleashing sustainability transformations through robust action. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(Part 1), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.064
5.
GhoshalS. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.16132558
6.
GrayR. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability . . . and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
7.
HahnT.FiggeF.PinkseJ.PreussL. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3587-2
8.
HahnT.PreussL.PinkseJ.FiggeF. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463-487. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0341
9.
HambrickD. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1346-1352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166119
10.
HamermeshD. S. (2013). Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how?Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.162
HoffmanA. J. (2021). The engaged scholar: Expanding the impact of academic research in today’s world. Stanford University Press.
13.
Howard-GrenvilleJ. (in press). Caring, courage and curiosity: Reflections on our roles as scholars in organizing for a sustainable future. Organization Theory.
LinnenlueckeM. K.GriffithsA. (2013). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.007
SlawinskiN.BansalP. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26(2), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0960
20.
TashmanP. (2020). A natural resource dependence perspective of the firm: How and why firms manage resource scarcity. Business & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319898811
VedulaS.DoblingerC.PachecoD. F.YorkJ. G.BacqS.RussoM. V.DeanT. J. (2020). Entrepreneurship for the public good: The co-evolution of social and environmental entrepreneurship research (Working paper).