This article examines how agency should be conceptualized to manage the pressing problems of the Anthropocene in support of sustainable change. The article reviews and analyzes literature on agency in relation to planetary boundaries, advancing the relational view of agency in which no actors are granted a primary ontological status, and agency is not limited to humans but may be attributed to other actors. This understanding of agency can effectively contribute to sustainable organizations; on the one hand, it enables non-anthropocentrism and on the other hand, admits that networks bind actors. We conclude that boundary blurring (between actors) and boundary formation (between actors and networks) are complementary processes. Consequently, relationality is proposed as an applicable means of respecting planetary boundaries, while recognizing that all action flows through circuits of power whose obligatory passage points are the major conduits for intervention. Intervention occurs through regulation and nudging action such as ecotaxation.
AlcadipaniR.HassardJ. (2010). Actor-network theory, organizations and critique: Towards a politics of organizing. Organization, 17, 419-435.
2.
AlcarazJ. M.SugarsK.NicolopoulouK.TiradoF. (2016). Cosmopolitanism or globalization: The Anthropocene turn. Society and Business Review, 11, 313-332.
3.
AlcottB. (2010). Impact caps: Why population, affluence and technology strategies should be abandoned. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 552-560.
4.
AlvessonM.HardyC.HarleyB. (2008). Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 480-501.
5.
AndersonS. D.CavanaghJ. (1996). The Top 200: The rise of global corporate power. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies.
6.
AndonovaL. B.MitchellR. B. (2010). The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 255-282.
7.
BanerjeeS. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24, 143-180.
8.
BanerjeeS. B. (2012). A climate for change? Critical reflections on the Durban United Nations climate change conference. Organization Studies, 33, 1761-1786.
9.
BapujiH.HoraM.SaeedA. M. (2012). Intentions, intermediaries, and interaction: Examining the emergence of routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1586-1607.
10.
BarnoskyA. D.HadlyE. A.BascompteJ.BerlowE. L.BrownJ. H.ForteliusM.. . . SmithA. B. (2012). Approaching a state shift in earth’s biosphere. Nature, 486, 52-58.
BeckU. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
13.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
BergströmO.DiedrichA. (2011). Exercising social responsibility in downsizing: Enrolling and mobilizing actors at a Swedish high-tech company. Organization Studies, 32, 897-919.
15.
BiermannF.BaiX.BondreN.BroadgateW.ChenC-T. A.DubeO. P.. . . SetoK. C. (2016). Down to earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 39, 341-350.
16.
BlommeR. J. (2014). Organisational change processes and emergence: Latourian, Weickean and Bourdieuian perspectives revisited. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 5, 332-347.
17.
BonnedahlK.HeikkurinenP. (Eds.). (2019). Strongly sustainable societies: Organizing activities of a hot and full Earth. London, England: Routledge.
BosseD. A.PhillipsR. A. (2016). Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Academy of Management Review, 41, 276-297.
20.
BouldingK. E. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In JarrettH. (Ed.), Environmental quality in a growing economy (pp. 3-14). London, England; Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
BundyJ.ShropshireC.BuchholtzA. K. (2013). Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38, 352-376.
22.
CallonM. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St Brieuc bay. In LawJ. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196-232). London, England: Routledge.
23.
CampbellN.McHughG.EnnisP. J. (2019). Climate change is not a problem: Speculative realism at the end of organization. Organization Studies, 40, 725-744. doi:10.1177/0170840618765553
24.
CapraF. (1995). The web of life. New York, NY: Anchor Doubleday.
25.
CarolanM. S. (2005). Society, biology, and ecology. Organization & Environment, 18, 393-421.
ClarkT. (2015). Ecocriticism on the edge: The Anthropocene as a threshold concept. London, England: Bloomsbury.
28.
CeballosG.EhrlichP. R.BarnoskyA. D.GarcíaA.PringleR. M.PalmerT. M. (2015). Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1, e1400253.
29.
CleggS.GeppertM.HollinsheadG. (2018). Politicization and political contests in and around contemporary multinational corporations: An introduction. Human Relations, 71, 745-765.
30.
CleggS. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London, England: Sage.
31.
CollingeC. (2006). Flat ontology and the deconstruction of scale: A response to Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 244-251.
32.
ConnollyL.CullenJ. (2018). Animals and organisations: An ethic of care framework. Organization & Environment, 31, 406-424. doi:10.1177/1086026617712975
CunhaM. P.e.RegoA.Vieira de CunhaJ. (2008). Ecocentric management: An update. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 311-321.
35.
DeanM. (2013). The signature of power: Sovereignty, governmentality and biopolitics. London, England: Sage.
36.
DelantyG. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. British Journal of Sociology, 57, 25-47.
37.
DobsonA (2006). Thick cosmopolitanism. Political Studies, 54, 165-184.
38.
DohJ. P.TashmanP.BenischkeM. (2019). Adapting to grand environmental challenges through collective entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33, 450-468. doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0056
39.
DoréA.MichalonJ. (2017). What makes human–animal relations “organizational”? The description of anthrozootechnical agencements. Organization, 24, 761-780. doi:10.1177/1350508416670249
40.
EllulJ. (1973). The technological society (WilkinsonJ., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books. (Originally published in 1954)
41.
EngelsF. (1892). The condition of the working class in England in 1844. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
42.
EzzamelM. (1994). Organizational change and accounting: Understanding the budgeting system in its organizational context. Organization Studies, 15, 213-240.
43.
EzzamelM.WillmottH. (2014). Registering “the ethical” in organization theory formation: Towards the disclosure of an “invisible force.”Organization Studies, 35, 1013-1039.
44.
FleetwoodS. (2005). Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization, 12, 197-222.
45.
FoleyJ.RamankuttyN.BraumanK.CassidyE.GerberJ.JohnstonM.. . . ZaksD. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337-342.
46.
FosterJ. B. (2012). The planetary rift and the new human exemptionalism: A political-economic critique of ecological modernization theory. Organization & Environment, 25, 211-237.
47.
FoxS. (2000). Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 853-868.
48.
GeorgeG.SchillebeeckxS. J. D.LiakT. L. (2015). From the editors: The management of natural resources: An overview and research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1595-1613.
49.
Georgescu-RoegenN. (1975). Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41, 347-381.
50.
Gibson-GrahamJ. K. (2011). A feminist project of belonging for the Anthropocene. Gender, Place and Culture, 18, 1-21.
51.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
52.
GiddensA. (2008). The politics of climate change: National responses to the challenge of global warming (Policy network paper). London, England: Policy Network.
53.
GladwinT. D. (2012). Capitalism critique: Systemic limits on business harmony with nature. In BansalP.HoffmanA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the environment (pp. 657-674). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
54.
GladwinT. N.KennellyJ. J.KrauseT. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.
55.
GramsciA., (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (HoareQ., Trans., & NowellG., Ed.). London, England: Lawrence & Wishart.
56.
HamiltonC. (2015). Getting the Anthropocene so wrong. Anthropocene Review, 2, 102-107.
57.
HamiltonC.BonneuilC.GemenneF. (2015). Thinking the Anthropocene: The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis. New York, NY: Routledge.
HarmanG. (2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
60.
HarmanG. (2007). The importance of Bruno Latour for philosophy. Cultural Studies Review, 13(1), 31-49.
61.
HarmanG. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Prahran, Victoria, Australia: Re.press.
62.
HeikkurinenP. (Ed.). (2017). Sustainability and peaceful coexistence for the Anthropocene. New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
HeikkurinenP. (2018). Degrowth by means of technology? A treatise for an ethos of releasement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1654-1665.
64.
HeikkurinenP.BonnedahlK. J. (2013). Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: A review and conceptual comparison of market- and stakeholder-oriented strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, 191-198.
65.
HeikkurinenP.LozanoskaJ.TosiP. (2018). Activities of degrowth and political change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 555-565.
66.
HeikkurinenP.MäkinenJ. (2018). Synthesising corporate responsibility on organisational and societal levels of analysis: An integrative perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 589-607.
67.
HeikkurinenP.RinkinenJ.JärvensivuT.WilénK.RuuskaT. (2016). Organising in the Anthropocene: An ontological outline for ecocentric theorising. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 705-714.
68.
HeikkurinenP.RuuskaT.WilénK.UlvilaM., (2019). The Anthropocene exit: Reconciling discursive tensions on the new geological epoch. Ecological Economics, 164, 106369.
69.
HelinS.BabriM. (2015). Travelling with a code of ethics: A contextual study of a Swedish MNC auditing a Chinese supplier. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 41-53.
70.
HoffmanA.EhrenfeldJ. (2014). The fourth wave, management science and practice in the age of the Anthropocene. In LawlerE.MohrmanS.O’TooleJ. (Eds.), Corporate stewardship: Achieving sustainable effectiveness (pp. 228-246). Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
71.
HoffmanA. J.JenningsP. D. (2015). Institutional theory and the natural environment: Research in (and on) the Anthropocene. Organization & Environment, 28, 8-31.
72.
HoffmanA. J.JenningsP. D. (2018). Re-engaging with sustainability in the Anthropocene era: An institutional approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
73.
HoutbeckersE.TaipaleT. (2017). Conceptualising worker agency for the challenges of the Anthropocene: Examples from recycling work in the global north. In HeikkurinenP. (Ed.), Sustainability and peaceful coexistence for the Anthropocene (pp. 140-162). New York, NY: Routledge.
74.
IntronaL. D. (2009). Ethics and the speaking of things. Theory, Culture & Society, 26, 25-46.
JacquesE. (1971). Time-span handbook: The use of time-span of discretion to measure the level of work in employment roles and to arrange an equitable payment structure. London, England: Heinemann.
77.
JenningsP. D.ZandbergenP. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015-1052.
78.
JonesT. M.FelpsW.BigleyG. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32, 137-155.
79.
LandrumN. E. (2017). Stages of corporate sustainability: Integrating the strong sustainability worldview. Organization & Environment, 31, 287-313. doi:10.1177/1086026617717456
80.
LatourB. (1988). Irréductions. In The Pasteurisation of France (pp. 153-236). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81.
LatourB. (1990). Technology is society made durable. Sociological Review, 38(Suppl. 1), 103-131.
82.
LatourB. (1997). On recalling ANT. Keynote speech presented at “Actor Network and After” Workshop at Keele University, England.
83.
LatourB. (1999a). On recalling ANT. Sociological Review, 47(Suppl. 1), 15-25.
84.
LatourB. (1999b). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85.
LatourB. (2002). Morality and technology: The end of the means (VennCouze, Trans.). Theory, Culture & Society, 19, 247-260.
86.
LatourB. (2009). Politics of nature. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
87.
LatourB. (2012a). Waiting for Gaia: Composing the common world through arts and politics. Equilibri, 16, 515-538.
88.
LatourB. (2012b). We have never been modern. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1991)
89.
LatourB. (2014a). Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History, 45, 1-18.
90.
LatourB. (2014b, November5). Anthropology at the time of the Anthropocene: A personal view of what is to be studied (Distinguished lecture, draft for comments, pp. 1-16). Presented at the 113th American Association of Anthropologists Meeting, Washington, D.C.
91.
LatourB. (2014c, March 26-27). How better to register the agency of things. Paper presented at Tanner Lectures, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
92.
LatourB. (2015). Telling friends from foes at the time of the Anthropocene. In HamiltonC.BonneuilC.GemenneF. (Eds.), The Anthropocene and the global environment crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch (pp. 145-155). London, England: Routledge. (Originally given as a lecture, Thinking the Anthropocene, EHESS, Paris, November 14-15, 2013.)
93.
LeeN.HassardJ. (1999). Organization unbound: Actor-network theory, research strategy and institutional flexibility. Organization, 6, 391-404.
94.
LenzenM.MoranD.KanemotoK.ForanB.LobefaroL.GeschkeA. (2012). International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature, 486, 109-112.
95.
LiuJ.MooneyH.HullV.DavisS. J.GaskellJ.HertelT.. . . LiS. (2015). Systems integration for global sustainability. Science, 347, 1258832.
96.
LukesS., (1974). Power: A radical view. London and New York: Macmillan.
97.
LuukkonenT. (1997). Why has Latour’s theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? Discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 38, 27-37.
98.
LyotardJ-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
99.
MaakT.PlessN. M. (2009). Business leaders as citizens of the world: Advancing humanism on a global scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 537-550.
100.
MagnaniN. (2012). Nonhuman actors, hybrid networks, and conflicts over municipal waste incinerators. Organization & Environment, 25, 131-145.
101.
MaguireS.HardyC. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 148-178.
102.
MalmA.HornborgA. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. Anthropocene Review, 1, 62-69.
103.
MarechalK.LazaricN. (2010). Overcoming inertia: Insights from evolutionary economics into improved energy and climate policies. Climate Policy, 10, 103-119.
104.
McLeanC.HassardJ. (2004). Symmetrical absence/symmetrical absurdity: Critical notes on the production of actor-network accounts. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 493-519.
105.
McShaneK. (2007). Anthropocentrism vs. nonanthropocentrism: Why should we care?Environmental Values, 16, 169-185.
106.
MeadowsD. H.MeadowsD. L.RandersJ.BehrensW. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York, NY: Universe Books.
107.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
108.
MooreJ. W. (2017). The Capitalocene, Part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. Journal of Peasant Studies, 44, 594-630. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036
109.
NiaziT. (2019). Contesting instrumental knowledge with communicative action: Why Kalabagh dam (Pakistan) remains unbuilt. Organization & Environment, 32, 441-465.
110.
NybergD.WrightC.KirkJ. (2017). Fracking the future: Temporality, framing and the politics of unconventional fossil fuels. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017, 10744. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2017.104
111.
OgdenL.HeynenN.OslenderU.WestP.KassamK. A.RobbinsP. (2013). Global assemblages, resilience, and earth stewardship in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 341-347.
112.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125-141.
113.
OrssattoR. J.CleggS. R. (1999). The political ecology of organizations: Toward a framework for analyzing business-environment relationships. Organization & Environment, 12, 263-279.
114.
ParkerM. (1995). Critique in the name of what? Postmodernism and critical approaches to organization. Organization Studies, 16, 553-564.
115.
PereyR. (2014). Organizing sustainability and the problem of scale: Local, global or fractal. Organization & Environment, 27, 215-222.
116.
PerrowC. (2011). The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
117.
PickeringA. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
118.
PieridesD.WoodmanD. (2012). Object-oriented sociology and organizing in the face of emergency: Bruno Latour, Graham Harman and the material turn. British Journal of Sociology, 63, 662-679.
119.
PinningtonA.MacklinR.CampbellT. (Eds.). (2007). Human resource management: Ethics and employment. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
120.
PitsisT.CleggS. R.MarosszekyM.Rura-PolleyT. (2003). Constructing the Olympic dream: Managing innovation through the future perfect. Organization Science, 14, 574-590.
121.
PloumL.BlokV.LansT.OmtaO. (2018). Towards a validated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship. Organization & Environment, 31, 113-132.
122.
PoggeT. W. (2001). Eradicating systemic poverty: Brief for a global resources dividend. Journal of Human Development, 2(1), 59-77.
123.
PurserR. E.ParkC.MontuoriA. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm?Academy of Management Review, 20, 1053-1089.
124.
RockströmJ.KarlbergL. (2010). The quadruple squeeze: Defining the safe operating space for freshwater use to achieve a triply green revolution in the Anthropocene. Ambio, 39, 257-265.
125.
RockströmJ.RichardsonK.SteffenW.MaceG. (2018). Planetary boundaries: Separating fact from fiction. A response to Montoya et al. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 33, 233-234.
126.
RockströmJ.SteffenW.NooneK.PerssonA.ChapinF. S.IIILambinE.. . . FoleyJ. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14, 32.
127.
SchutzA. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Originally published in 1932)
128.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
129.
SeyfangG.SmithA. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16, 584-603.
130.
ShrivastavaP. (1995a). Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review, 20, 118-137.
131.
ShrivastavaP. (1995b). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, 936-960.
132.
ShrivastavaP.HartS. L. (1992). Greening organizations. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 52, 185-189.
133.
SteffenW.RichardsonK.RockströmJ.CornellS. E.FetzerI.BennettE. M.. . . SörlinS. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855.
134.
SteffenW.SmithM. (2013). Planetary boundaries, equity and global sustainability: Why wealthy countries could benefit from more equity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 403-408.
135.
TourishD. J.PinningtonA. H. (2002). Transformational leadership, corporate cultism and the spirituality paradigm: An unholy trinity in the workplace?Human Relations, 55, 147-172.
136.
UlvilaM.WilénK. (2017). Engaging with the Plutocene: Moving towards degrowth and post-capitalistic futures. In HeikkurinenP. (Ed.), Sustainability and peaceful coexistence for the Anthropocene (pp. 119-139). London, England: Routledge.
Van den BerghJ. C.KallisG. (2012). Growth, a-growth or degrowth to stay within planetary boundaries?Journal of Economic Issues, 46, 909-920.
139.
VenturiniT. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 258-273.
140.
VitaliS.GlattfelderJ. B.BattistonS. (2011). The network of global corporate control. PLoS One, 6, e25995.
141.
VoegtlinC.SchererG. A. (2017). Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 227-243.
142.
WaddockS. (2011). We are all stakeholders of Gaia: A normative perspective on stakeholder thinking. Organization & Environment, 24, 192-212.
143.
WeberM. (2013). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London, England: Routledge.
144.
WiesnerR.ChadeeD.BestP. (2017). Managing change toward environmental sustainability: A conceptual model in small and medium enterprises. Organization & Environment, 31, 152-177.
145.
WhitemanG.WalkerB.PeregoP. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 307-336.
146.
WhittleA.SpicerA. (2008). Is actor network theory critique?Organization Studies, 29, 611-629.
147.
WinnM. I.PogutzS. (2013). Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: New horizons for management research. Organization & Environment, 26, 203-229.
WrightC.NybergD. (2017). An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1633-1661.
150.
YorkJ. G.HargraveT. J.PachecoD. F. (2016). Converging winds: Logic hybridization in Colorado wind energy field. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 579-610.
